Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Shashank Tyagi

Channel

Shashank Tyagi

@shashanktyagi4u

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

62,261subscribers

+254 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001257917718
TypeChannel
Username@shashanktyagi4u
DescriptionCreating Community of UPSC aspirants who thrive in Exam & Life Ex-Consultant, Office of Minister Social Welfare GNCTD | Passion for teaching | StudyiqIAS PSIR Optional, GS Polity & IR You can use discount code TYAGILIVE for at Study
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 31 August 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live25 September 2026
Measurements held33
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 25 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/shashanktyagi4u

Topic

Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

62,00562,26162,1337 August 2026 — 62,007 subscribers7 August 2026 — 62,007 subscribers7 August 2026 — 62,005 subscribers8 August 2026 — 62,010 subscribers9 August 2026 — 62,026 subscribers10 August 2026 — 62,048 subscribers11 August 2026 — 62,051 subscribers12 August 2026 — 62,053 subscribers14 August 2026 — 62,071 subscribers15 August 2026 — 62,078 subscribers17 August 2026 — 62,081 subscribers18 August 2026 — 62,084 subscribers19 August 2026 — 62,083 subscribers20 August 2026 — 62,087 subscribers21 August 2026 — 62,086 subscribers23 August 2026 — 62,113 subscribers24 August 2026 — 62,105 subscribers26 August 2026 — 62,108 subscribers27 August 2026 — 62,135 subscribers28 August 2026 — 62,140 subscribers29 August 2026 — 62,130 subscribers30 August 2026 — 62,136 subscribers31 August 2026 — 62,141 subscribers1 September 2026 — 62,171 subscribers2 September 2026 — 62,170 subscribers3 September 2026 — 62,195 subscribers5 September 2026 — 62,192 subscribers8 September 2026 — 62,171 subscribers11 September 2026 — 62,219 subscribers13 September 2026 — 62,198 subscribers15 September 2026 — 62,184 subscribers17 September 2026 — 62,195 subscribers25 September 2026 — 62,261 subscribers7 August 202625 September 2026
33 measurements spanning 49 days, net +254. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 61,967–62,299 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 33
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
25 Sept 2026, 08:1862,261+66
17 Sept 2026, 07:0162,195+11
15 Sept 2026, 05:4162,184-14
13 Sept 2026, 11:1962,198-21
11 Sept 2026, 13:5862,219+48
8 Sept 2026, 19:1962,171-21
5 Sept 2026, 10:2262,192-3
3 Sept 2026, 14:1562,195+25
2 Sept 2026, 04:4462,170-1
1 Sept 2026, 04:1662,171+30
31 Aug 2026, 06:4562,141+5
30 Aug 2026, 03:1162,136+6
29 Aug 2026, 01:4862,130-10
28 Aug 2026, 00:3462,140+5
27 Aug 2026, 01:3962,135+27
26 Aug 2026, 00:1462,108+3
24 Aug 2026, 22:1362,105-8
23 Aug 2026, 04:5362,113+27
21 Aug 2026, 18:3762,086-1
20 Aug 2026, 15:5562,087first reading

Engagement

232 posts held, back to 4 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 115 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
6.14%
avg views ÷ 62,261 subscribers
Avg views / post
3,820
108 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.279%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
109
of 232 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 99 of 108 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 30 September 2026
Posts held232 (4 August 2026 – 30 September 2026)
Views total413,013
Reactions total1,084
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken30 Sept 2026, 16:12 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈4,670
Videos
≈191
Links
≈4,270

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 30 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
11m 00s
Average length
2m 12s

Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

2,681 reactions across 193 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 73.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤1,95873.0%
👍30211.3%
🔥1445.37%
🙏1274.74%
😁1134.21%
🥰210.783%
👏130.485%
🤩30.112%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 201 of the 232 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,681 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 232 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 30 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

30 Sept 2026, 15:19 UTC627 views3 reactionsread 30 September 2026

Why World War I was called World War I ? Why they numbered it ? World war ll? History has seen many wars of great scale. What was special about them? Comments 👇🏻

❤3

30 Sept 2026, 13:50 UTC≈1,090 views14 reactionsread 30 September 2026
Forwarded from @PSIRShashanktyagiPhoto

Can you identify the type of feminism from image above? 😁

❤8😁4🔥2

30 Sept 2026, 13:43 UTC≈1,270 views2 reactionsread 30 September 2026

Hello, If prep is going good. Keep it up. Wherever you need help, shoot a msg. If planning to start sincerely now, then Sale discount + Old/current stu discount can be availed via Special code on all courses. Just share Name : Mobile no. : Batch you want to enrol in : at @shashanktyagi14 telegram chat

❤2

30 Sept 2026, 13:19 UTC≈1,370 viewsread 30 September 2026

Are you following any goal, what you are set to achieve by December 2026?

30 Sept 2026, 12:31 UTC≈1,580 views2 reactionsread 30 September 2026

MAINS PRACTICE QUESTION Q. Critically examine how the judicial expansion of the "public view" doctrine to the digital domain reinforces the constitutional safeguards under Article 17. (10 Marks, 150 Words)

❤2

30 Sept 2026, 12:31 UTC≈1,490 views0 reactionsread 30 September 2026
Poll

How many of the above pairs are correctly matched?

  1. (a) Only one pair14%
  2. (b) Only two pairs51%
  3. (c) Only three pairs26%
  4. (d) All four pairs8%

Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

30 Sept 2026, 12:31 UTC≈1,290 views0 reactionsread 30 September 2026

Q. Consider the following pairs regarding legal doctrines and statutory provisions related to the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act: 1. Section 3(1)(r) of the SC/ST Act — Requires the intentional insult or intimidation to take place in a location within "public view". 2. Hitesh Verma Judgment (2020) — Established that casteist abuse uttered entirely within a closed private space without witnesses attracts the pr…

Showing the 12 most recent of 232 posts we hold for @shashanktyagi4u. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@shashanktyagi4u edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
30 September 2026
Most recent edit
30 September 2026

Polls

The 6 most recent of 36 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

30 Sept 2026, 12:31 UTCAnonymous Quiz84 voters

How many of the above pairs are correctly matched?

  1. (a) Only one pair14%
  2. (b) Only two pairs51%
  3. (c) Only three pairs26%
  4. (d) All four pairs8%

Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

29 Sept 2026, 12:28 UTCAnonymous Quiz175 voters

How many of the above statements are correct?

  1. (a) Only one12%
  2. (b) Only two48%
  3. (c) Only three31%
  4. (d) All four9%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

28 Sept 2026, 12:32 UTCAnonymous Quiz171 voters

How many of the above statements are correct?

  1. (a) Only one5%
  2. (b) Only two56%
  3. (c) Only three27%
  4. (d) All four12%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

26 Sept 2026, 12:35 UTCAnonymous Quiz184 voters

How many of the above statements is/are correct>

  1. A. Only One26%
  2. B. Only Two42%
  3. C. All Three15%
  4. D. NONE17%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

25 Sept 2026, 12:34 UTCAnonymous Quiz273 voters

How many of the above statements are correct?

  1. (a) Only one30%
  2. (b) Only two50%
  3. (c) Only three18%
  4. (d) All four3%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

24 Sept 2026, 12:33 UTCAnonymous Quiz265 voters

How many of the above statements are correct?

  1. (a) Only one7%
  2. (b) Only two43%
  3. (c) Only three40%
  4. (d) All four10%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 232 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 30 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one

Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.

StudyIQ Education
@Studyiqeducation · 362,157
#1
Ankit Agrawal Official
@ankitagrawalofficial · 52,667
#2
Bhuvan Jha Study IQ
@bhuvanstudyiq · 35,608
#3
CSLIVE Group_UPSC
@cslivegroup · 56,018
#4
Vision IAS (Official)
@VisionIAS_UPSC · 397,568
#5
Dr.Dipanwita
@upscwithdipanwita · 5,357
#6
Clarity for UPSC by Dr.Shivin (AIR - 297)
@theanonymousupscaspirant · 255,826
#7
AchieveUpsc: VASULIVE
@VasuKataraStudyIQ · 14,487
#8
Abhishek Singh Rathore
@ASRLIVE001 · 6,511
#9
CSE with Sainil Nagare (History)
@csewithsainilnagare · 75,514
#10
CSE with VASU Sir
@csewithvasusir · 12,095
#11
Economics with Nanki
@economicswithnanki · 21,658
#12
Dr Kapil Sir Official
@Drkapil_Geo · 4,575
#13
UPSC Free Study Material
@UPSC_Free_Study_Material · 5,023
#14
Pathfinder (Official)
@pathfinder_upsc · 24,795
#15
PSIR - Civils Front
@PSIR_Civils_Front · 21,195
#16
Current Affairs UPSC/PSC
@upscwithprachi · 1,549
#17
StudyIQ Interview Guidance Program (IGP)
@StudyIQ_IGP · 2,935
#18
Mrunal's Official Channel: General Studies, Current Affairs, Economy for UPSC
@mrunalorg · 212,311
#19
Vajiram and Ravi Official Channel
@vajiramandraviofficial · 282,101
#20
Dr Vipan Goyal StudyIQ
@DrVipanGoyal · 132,467
#21
UPSC Material 2027
@upscpdfs25 · 34,069
#22
UPSC Toppers Notes
@cse_topper · 30,492
#23
UPSC Optionals ,essay and MGP forum
@upsccsechaicoffee · 2,540
#24
Hindustan Times- Official Channel
@hindustantimes · 63,216
#25
Prachi Ma'am
@PrachiMaam_Testbook · 3,196
#26
𝐔𝐏𝐒𝐂 𝐅𝐈𝐋𝐄𝐒
@upscfilescse · 26,481
#27
Atish Mathur Official
@csepaper2atish · 116,987
#28
UPSC PRELIMS TESTS
@upsc_prelims_tests · 22,298
#29
Ankit Avasthi Sir
@AnkitAvasthi · 113,402
#30
Sleepy Classes PSIR Optional
@PSIRforUPSCandPCS · 7,479
#31
UPSC Ethics Videos Pdfs Material
@upsc_ethics_videos_pdfs_material · 1,562
#32
Pooja Dwivedi UPSC
@poojadwivediUPSC · 3,717
#33
INDIAN EXPRESS NEWSPAPER
@indianexpress_newspaper1 · 37,766
#34
UnderStand UPSC
@UnderStandUPSC · 114,253
#35
UPSC TOPPERS NOTES PDFS COPIES
@upsc_toppers_notes_copies_pdfs · 29,843
#36
TDH - UPSC CSE
@darkhorsecse · 35,694
#37
IAS PCS Pathshala
@iaspcspathshala · 188,123
#38
UPSC IR ( MINDMAPS)
@UPSC_irmindmaps_di_mains_prelims · 46,117
#39
UPSC MAINS MODEL ANSWER
@upsc_mains_model_answer · 88,979
#40
GS_Gill
@gs_gillupsc · 10,521
#41
UPSC PIB NEWS current affairs polity geography science economy government schemes ir prelims mains
@PIB_UPSC · 69,860
#42
CSE RESOURCES
@cseresource · 41,017
#43
upsc_test_2027
@upsc_test_series_hub · 20
#44
UPSC PLANNER
@upsc_planner_ias · 61,009
#45
JUST UPSC PYQ
@justupscpyq · 33,316
#46
PW UPSC Wallah
@pw_upsc · 188,674
#47
Daily Current Affairs (Free) For UPSC
@freecurrentaffairsupsc · 648 (as read 22 August 2026)
#48
InsightsIAS (official) Guidance - Tips for Success
@insightsIAStips · 190,427
#49
Sunya IAS Short Notes
@sunyanotes50 · 191,819
#50
World Affairs by Unacademy
@worldaffairsbyunacademy · 13,432
#51
ForumIASOfficial
@forumiasofficial · 29,703
#52
UPSC CSE Topper by Vikas Dhayal
@csetopper · 174,859
#53
Parcham Classes
@PARCHAMCLASSES06 · 329,911
#54
History with Vikas Ahlawat
@historyvikasahlawat · 8,633
#55
Vyasa IAS (Official)
@vyasaiasofficial · 20,893
#56
ABCD of UPSC by Vikas Dhayal
@ABCD_of_UPSC · 61,657
#57
Clear Vision For UPSC
@Clearvisionforupsc · 65,905
#58
Platform IAS (Official)
@PLAtforM_IAS · 34,929
#59
Prashant Dhawan Sir Official✅
@DhawanSir · 140,135
#60
Ashish Malviya Official
@Malviyalive · 6,799
#61
The Hindu
@THnewsupdates · 248,930
#62
Sumit Rewri
@sumitrewri · 53,028
#63
UPSC Toppers Notes & Copies
@cse_toppers_notes · 43,619
#64
Geography by Kapil Bhardwaj
@kapilbhardwajofficial · 12,147
#65
Karam Yogi Divakar Bothra
@divakarbothra · 4,892
#66
Invincible Captain
@Official_Captain_Invincible · 10,303
#67
OnlyIAS Nothing Else
@onlyiasnothingelse · 206,277
#68
Kumar Book Centre
@kbcdelhi · 1,303
#69
PSIR Toppers Copy
@PSIRToppersCopy · 3,773
#70

Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 22 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Pathfinder (Official)
@pathfinder_upsc · 24,795
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 53 here — alongside 52 others — read 15 September 2026
Bhuvan Jha Study IQ
@bhuvanstudyiq · 35,608
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 2 September 2026
Ankit Agrawal Official
@ankitagrawalofficial · 52,667
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 24 August 2026
StudyIQ Education
@Studyiqeducation · 362,157
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 10 August 2026
Prashant Tiwari
@UPSCwithPrashant · 184,315
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 23 August 2026
CSLIVE Group_UPSC
@cslivegroup · 56,018
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 23 August 2026
Economics with Nanki
@economicswithnanki · 21,658
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 22 September 2026
CSE with Sainil Nagare (History)
@csewithsainilnagare · 75,514
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 19 August 2026
Sumit Rewri
@sumitrewri · 53,028
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 24 August 2026
Ankit Avasthi Sir
@AnkitAvasthi · 113,402
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 14 August 2026
Dr Vipan Goyal StudyIQ
@DrVipanGoyal · 132,467
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 13 August 2026
Deepak Yadav Education Mains Group
@deepakmainsanswerwriting · 73,840
Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 19 August 2026
StudyIQ PCS
@PCSSaarthi · 80,701
Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 19 August 2026
Prashant Dhawan Sir Official✅
@DhawanSir · 140,135
Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 13 August 2026
UPSC PRELIMS MCQs
@csecrackupsc · 54,144
Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 23 August 2026
Shashank Sajwan
@iasips_mentor · 84,304
Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 18 August 2026
Drishti IAS: KAROL BAGH
@drishtiIAS_KB · 36,976
Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 62 here — alongside 61 others — read 1 September 2026
PSIR - Civils Front
@PSIR_Civils_Front · 21,195
Telegram ranks this channel #46 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 24 September 2026
UPSC Constitution MCQs Quiz
@UPSC_Prelims_Constitution_Quiz · 26,894
Telegram ranks this channel #47 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 11 September 2026
UPSC IR ( MINDMAPS)
@UPSC_irmindmaps_di_mains_prelims · 46,117
Telegram ranks this channel #68 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 27 August 2026

This channel appears in 20 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 25 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Shashank Tyagi” (@shashanktyagi4u), 62,261 subscribers as measured 25 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/shashanktyagi4u.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.