Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Geography by Kapil Bhardwaj

Channel

Geography by Kapil Bhardwaj

@kapilbhardwajofficial

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

12,172subscribers

-206 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001784259639
TypeChannel
Username@kapilbhardwajofficial
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live19 September 2026
Measurements held31
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 19 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/kapilbhardwajofficial

Topic

Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

12,17212,37812,2757 August 2026 — 12,378 subscribers8 August 2026 — 12,373 subscribers9 August 2026 — 12,367 subscribers10 August 2026 — 12,362 subscribers11 August 2026 — 12,352 subscribers12 August 2026 — 12,343 subscribers13 August 2026 — 12,337 subscribers14 August 2026 — 12,327 subscribers16 August 2026 — 12,324 subscribers17 August 2026 — 12,314 subscribers18 August 2026 — 12,308 subscribers19 August 2026 — 12,306 subscribers20 August 2026 — 12,304 subscribers21 August 2026 — 12,303 subscribers23 August 2026 — 12,301 subscribers25 August 2026 — 12,300 subscribers26 August 2026 — 12,289 subscribers27 August 2026 — 12,291 subscribers28 August 2026 — 12,294 subscribers29 August 2026 — 12,287 subscribers30 August 2026 — 12,277 subscribers31 August 2026 — 12,274 subscribers1 September 2026 — 12,273 subscribers2 September 2026 — 12,264 subscribers5 September 2026 — 12,256 subscribers9 September 2026 — 12,225 subscribers11 September 2026 — 12,213 subscribers13 September 2026 — 12,200 subscribers15 September 2026 — 12,198 subscribers17 September 2026 — 12,187 subscribers19 September 2026 — 12,172 subscribers7 August 202619 September 2026
31 measurements spanning 43 days, net -206. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 12,141–12,409 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 31
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
19 Sept 2026, 10:1812,172-15
17 Sept 2026, 01:2012,187-11
15 Sept 2026, 02:1412,198-2
13 Sept 2026, 10:5712,200-13
11 Sept 2026, 14:5712,213-12
9 Sept 2026, 02:1812,225-31
5 Sept 2026, 21:0012,256-8
2 Sept 2026, 16:0412,264-9
1 Sept 2026, 15:1612,273-1
31 Aug 2026, 18:0412,274-3
30 Aug 2026, 20:2812,277-10
29 Aug 2026, 23:1412,287-7
28 Aug 2026, 00:3412,294+3
27 Aug 2026, 03:4212,291+2
26 Aug 2026, 01:1612,289-11
25 Aug 2026, 00:1812,300-1
23 Aug 2026, 11:3512,301-2
21 Aug 2026, 21:3912,303-1
20 Aug 2026, 20:3212,304-2
19 Aug 2026, 21:4212,306first reading

Engagement

49 posts held, back to 15 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 45 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
6.02%
avg views ÷ 12,172 subscribers
Avg views / post
732
8 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.291%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
8
of 49 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 5 of 8 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 30 August 2026
Posts held49 (15 June 202630 August 2026)
Views total5,859
Reactions total10
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken2 Sept 2026, 22:40 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

122 reactions across 32 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 62.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
7662.3%
👍3125.4%
🔥1411.5%
👎10.82%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 33 of the 49 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 122 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 49 most recent posts we hold, published 15 June 2026 to 30 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

25 Aug 2026, 15:10 UTC864 views3 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Forwarded from @peeyushupsc

Dear students, this year’s ethics paper again re-emphasises on conceptual clarity and the ability to apply ethical principles in real life scenarios. I have been telling you again and again that Ethics is not about content accumulation alone ( definitions, elaborate examples etc ). As you can see in this paper also, how that approach won’t help you in generating arguments in such papers. In this video , I have anal

3

25 Aug 2026, 10:27 UTC869 views2 reactionsread 2 September 2026

Coming Sunday you guys have Geography optional Paper....Please do an active recall for all these questions for better performance 1. “Artificial Intelligence and geospatial big data represent a second Quantitative Revolution in Geography.” Critically examine whether their ability to predict spatial behaviour has also improved geographical explanation, or merely replaced transparent models with opaque algorithms. 2. T

1🔥1

25 Aug 2026, 10:23 UTC651 views1 reactionsread 2 September 2026
File

Please revise this file at least 2–3 times before the exam. All the best!

1

21 Aug 2026, 15:24 UTC≈1,060 views2 reactionsread 2 September 2026
File

File, posted without a caption

1🔥1

Showing the 12 most recent of 49 posts we hold for @kapilbhardwajofficial. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@kapilbhardwajofficial edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
11 August 2026
Most recent edit
11 August 2026

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

UPSC Sutra With Ravi Kapoor Ex IRS
@becoming_ias_super_simplified · 39,188
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 30 August 2026
Laghima Tiwari : AIR 19 UPSC CSE'22
@laghimatiwariAIR19 · 25,307
Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 14 September 2026
Bhuvan Jha Study IQ
@bhuvanstudyiq · 35,576
Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 2 September 2026
Ankit Agrawal Official
@ankitagrawalofficial · 52,834
Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 24 August 2026
UPSC with Kawal Baweja
@upscwithkawalbaweja · 25,885
Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 57 here — alongside 56 others — read 13 September 2026
Prashant Tiwari
@UPSCwithPrashant · 184,315
Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 23 August 2026
LAXMIDHAR SIR
@LAXMIDHAR_SIR · 52,177
Telegram ranks this channel #47 of 54 here — alongside 53 others — read 24 August 2026
Optimize IAS
@asksantoshsir · 36,981
Telegram ranks this channel #55 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 1 September 2026
CSLIVE Group_UPSC
@cslivegroup · 55,743
Telegram ranks this channel #58 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 23 August 2026
Shashank Tyagi
@shashanktyagi4u · 62,195
Telegram ranks this channel #65 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 22 August 2026
CivicCentre IAS (Official)
@civiccentredotin · 27,310
Telegram ranks this channel #71 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 11 September 2026
JK Exam Cracker
@jkexamcracker · 31,722
Telegram ranks this channel #86 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 5 September 2026

This channel appears in 12 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Geography by Kapil Bhardwaj” (@kapilbhardwajofficial), 12,172 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/kapilbhardwajofficial.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.