Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for GS_Gill

Channel

GS_Gill

@gs_gillupsc

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

10,294subscribers

-409 since we began measuring on 22 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001877852928
TypeChannel
Username@gs_gillupsc
CreatedBetween 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded22 August 2026
Last confirmed live7 November 2026
Measurements held45
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 7 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/gs_gillupsc

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 82% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

10,29410,70310,498.522 August 2026 — 10,703 subscribers23 August 2026 — 10,699 subscribers24 August 2026 — 10,693 subscribers25 August 2026 — 10,688 subscribers27 August 2026 — 10,687 subscribers28 August 2026 — 10,682 subscribers30 August 2026 — 10,677 subscribers31 August 2026 — 10,670 subscribers1 September 2026 — 10,666 subscribers2 September 2026 — 10,660 subscribers3 September 2026 — 10,651 subscribers5 September 2026 — 10,638 subscribers8 September 2026 — 10,611 subscribers11 September 2026 — 10,589 subscribers13 September 2026 — 10,575 subscribers14 September 2026 — 10,571 subscribers16 September 2026 — 10,564 subscribers18 September 2026 — 10,550 subscribers24 September 2026 — 10,521 subscribers3 October 2026 — 10,473 subscribers8 October 2026 — 10,441 subscribers12 October 2026 — 10,416 subscribers14 October 2026 — 10,403 subscribers15 October 2026 — 10,400 subscribers16 October 2026 — 10,389 subscribers17 October 2026 — 10,388 subscribers18 October 2026 — 10,385 subscribers20 October 2026 — 10,379 subscribers21 October 2026 — 10,372 subscribers22 October 2026 — 10,359 subscribers23 October 2026 — 10,353 subscribers24 October 2026 — 10,348 subscribers25 October 2026 — 10,345 subscribers26 October 2026 — 10,340 subscribers27 October 2026 — 10,335 subscribers28 October 2026 — 10,330 subscribers29 October 2026 — 10,326 subscribers30 October 2026 — 10,320 subscribers31 October 2026 — 10,315 subscribers1 November 2026 — 10,313 subscribers2 November 2026 — 10,314 subscribers3 November 2026 — 10,311 subscribers5 November 2026 — 10,307 subscribers6 November 2026 — 10,301 subscribers7 November 2026 — 10,294 subscribers22 August 20267 November 2026
45 measurements spanning 77 days, net -409. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 10,233–10,764 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 45
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
7 Nov 2026, 02:1810,294-7
6 Nov 2026, 03:0910,301-6
5 Nov 2026, 05:5110,307-4
3 Nov 2026, 05:4610,311-3
2 Nov 2026, 07:1710,314+1
1 Nov 2026, 09:4410,313-2
31 Oct 2026, 09:3910,315-5
30 Oct 2026, 11:2810,320-6
29 Oct 2026, 10:3710,326-4
28 Oct 2026, 07:5610,330-5
27 Oct 2026, 06:2010,335-5
26 Oct 2026, 09:1810,340-5
25 Oct 2026, 12:5010,345-3
24 Oct 2026, 11:3010,348-5
23 Oct 2026, 11:2910,353-6
22 Oct 2026, 11:2710,359-13
21 Oct 2026, 07:4110,372-7
20 Oct 2026, 07:3010,379-6
18 Oct 2026, 04:1810,385-3
17 Oct 2026, 05:2010,388first reading

Engagement

30 posts held, back to 15 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 9 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 30 posts for this entry, the most recent from 25 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

40 reactions across 7 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 62.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤2562.5%
💯922.5%
👍615.0%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 30 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 40 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 30 most recent posts we hold, published 15 August 2026 to 25 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

25 Aug 2026, 08:12 UTC382 viewsread 26 August 2026
Forwarded from @gs_gillPCSPoll

Sahll we plan a dedicated EPFO Online/Offline course or YT is fine?

  1. Yes62%
  2. No38%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

24 Aug 2026, 09:45 UTC672 views1 reactionsread 26 August 2026

https://youtube.com/live/Sf-kOwHwQbg?feature=share

❤1

23 Aug 2026, 15:19 UTC808 views4 reactionsread 26 August 2026

https://youtube.com/live/Sf-kOwHwQbg?feature=share

❤4

22 Aug 2026, 04:25 UTC≈1,700 views12 reactionsread 26 August 2026

There is some really good news for all UPSC EPFO APFC aspirants. A recent change in the examination syllabus has made one important area much simpler for you. This is definitely a positive development and works in favour of serious UPSC candidates. Shall be bringing a detailed video very soon to explain exactly what has changed and how you should prepare accordingly. But for now, just know this it is a change in y…

❤9👍3

21 Aug 2026, 09:21 UTC≈1,210 viewsread 26 August 2026

https://www.youtube.com/live/UPoKG7qcWMY?si=6HqnE1UysnT4IA14 Class at 6:00

Showing the 12 most recent of 30 posts we hold for @gs_gillupsc. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

25 Aug 2026, 08:12 UTCAnonymous Poll690 voters

Sahll we plan a dedicated EPFO Online/Offline course or YT is fine?

  1. Yes62%
  2. No38%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 30 most recent posts we hold, published 15 August 2026 to 25 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Catalyst Group Official
@catalystofficial · 81,872
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 45 here — alongside 44 others — read 14 September 2026
Margdarshan IAS By Siddharth Singh
@sidbhaiyaupsc · 19,503
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 45 here — alongside 44 others — read 5 October 2026
Bhuvan Jha Study IQ
@bhuvanstudyiq · 35,480
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 2 September 2026
Prashant Tiwari
@UPSCwithPrashant · 186,303
Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 23 August 2026
Study Smart IAS PCS
@StudySmartIASPCS · 33,751
Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 7 September 2026
Tejas Civils - UPPCS
@tejascivils · 20,396
Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 29 September 2026
CSLIVE Group_UPSC
@cslivegroup · 56,786
Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 23 August 2026
UPSC & Life with Shashank Tyagi
@shashanktyagi4u · 61,900
Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 22 August 2026
Asad Zuberi AIR 86 UPSC Resources
@asad_zuberi · 22,815
Telegram ranks this channel #56 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 19 September 2026

This channel appears in 9 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“GS_Gill” (@gs_gillupsc), 10,294 subscribers as measured 7 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/gs_gillupsc.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.