Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for علی شریفی زارچی - Ali Sharifi Zarchi

Channel

علی شریفی زارچی - Ali Sharifi Zarchi

@sharifizarchi

On this record: Topic · Observations · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

29,668subscribers

+6,697 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003904196854
TypeChannel
Username@sharifizarchi
CreatedBetween 1 April 2026 and 6 June 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live8 October 2026
Measurements held38
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 8 October 2026
On Telegramt.me/sharifizarchi

Topic

Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Views per post sit far above this size band

26,000 average views per post against 29,192 subscribers — an engagement rate of 89.1%. Across the 2,216 registered channels in the same cohort — 10,062–31,610 subscribers, posting mainly in Persian — the middle half sit between 2.96% and 14.6%, with a median of 7.10%.

What this was computed from
Window30 days (8 September 2026 – 8 October 2026)
Posts measured9 of 9 published in the window (0 exact, 9 rounded by Telegram)
Views totalled234,100
Mature posts only92.5% over 8 posts read at least 24h after publication
Subscribers29,192 measured 4 October 2026
Cohortb10000:fas · 2,216 channels · p10 1.22% · p25 2.96% · p50 7.10% · p75 14.6% · p90 25.2%
Position in cohort99.187th percentile · 12.5× the cohort median
Uncertainty±0.037% of the figure, from Telegram’s rounding
Post languagePersian · 100.0% of the window’s posts

When this is recorded. A channel is listed here only when its engagement rate sits at or above the 99th percentile of its cohort and is at least 3× away from that cohort’s median — above it — on both the all-readings figure and the mature-only figure. The percentile alone would be circular: a percentile cut puts the same share of every cohort in the tail whatever the data looks like. The distance from the median is what makes it a statement about this channel.

This is not a verdict, and the direction is not a quality signal. A low rate has many innocent causes — audiences that read in the Telegram app without opening the channel, a subscriber base built long before the current output, an audience in a different timezone from our reading. A high rate has innocent causes too: a post that travelled far beyond the channel’s own subscribers will do it. We publish the measurement and the distribution it sits in. The full cohort baselines are downloadable, so this comparison can be reproduced rather than trusted.

Recorded under the key err_high, last confirmed 8 October 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Growth

22,97129,66826,319.56 August 2026 — 22,971 subscribers6 August 2026 — 22,971 subscribers6 August 2026 — 23,294 subscribers8 August 2026 — 23,415 subscribers9 August 2026 — 23,530 subscribers10 August 2026 — 23,634 subscribers11 August 2026 — 23,712 subscribers12 August 2026 — 23,789 subscribers13 August 2026 — 24,057 subscribers14 August 2026 — 25,098 subscribers16 August 2026 — 25,470 subscribers17 August 2026 — 25,664 subscribers18 August 2026 — 25,769 subscribers19 August 2026 — 25,863 subscribers20 August 2026 — 25,927 subscribers21 August 2026 — 26,000 subscribers22 August 2026 — 26,159 subscribers24 August 2026 — 26,280 subscribers25 August 2026 — 26,354 subscribers26 August 2026 — 26,399 subscribers27 August 2026 — 26,536 subscribers28 August 2026 — 26,648 subscribers29 August 2026 — 26,729 subscribers30 August 2026 — 26,809 subscribers31 August 2026 — 26,871 subscribers1 September 2026 — 26,905 subscribers2 September 2026 — 26,919 subscribers3 September 2026 — 26,963 subscribers5 September 2026 — 27,088 subscribers8 September 2026 — 27,282 subscribers11 September 2026 — 27,363 subscribers13 September 2026 — 27,540 subscribers14 September 2026 — 27,660 subscribers16 September 2026 — 27,715 subscribers18 September 2026 — 27,790 subscribers25 September 2026 — 27,988 subscribers4 October 2026 — 29,192 subscribers8 October 2026 — 29,668 subscribers6 August 20268 October 2026
38 measurements spanning 63 days, net +6,697. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 21,966–30,673 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 38
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Oct 2026, 13:5429,668+476
4 Oct 2026, 00:0129,192+1,204
25 Sept 2026, 07:4027,988+198
18 Sept 2026, 23:3827,790+75
16 Sept 2026, 13:4127,715+55
14 Sept 2026, 16:4027,660+120
13 Sept 2026, 04:1827,540+177
11 Sept 2026, 07:5627,363+81
8 Sept 2026, 14:2027,282+194
5 Sept 2026, 07:4027,088+125
3 Sept 2026, 09:3326,963+44
2 Sept 2026, 02:5726,919+14
1 Sept 2026, 02:3326,905+34
31 Aug 2026, 02:2326,871+62
30 Aug 2026, 02:5626,809+80
29 Aug 2026, 04:5826,729+81
28 Aug 2026, 06:3826,648+112
27 Aug 2026, 08:1426,536+137
26 Aug 2026, 06:4426,399+45
25 Aug 2026, 09:2426,354first reading

Engagement

42 posts held, back to 6 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 88 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
86.2%
avg views ÷ 29,668 subscribers
Avg views / post
25,600
10 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.80%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
10
of 42 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 October 2026
Posts held42 (6 June 2026 – 8 October 2026)
Views total255,700
Reactions total9,711
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Oct 2026, 13:35 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
2m 22s
Average length
2m 22s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

48,431 reactions across 41 posts, in 52 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 78.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤38,18478.8%
💔2,4465.05%
🙏2,1424.42%
👍1,3352.76%
❤‍🔥1,2142.51%
🔥6041.25%
👏5091.05%
😭3580.739%
😍3430.708%
👎2010.415%
🥰1260.26%
🕊1080.223%
💯810.167%
🤯690.142%
👌650.134%
🤬630.13%
🫡560.116%
🤣530.109%
💘520.107%
🏆440.091%
32 further kinds3780.78%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 42 of the 42 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 49,893 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 42 most recent posts we hold, published 6 June 2026 to 8 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

8 Oct 2026, 07:15 UTC≈7,300 views648 reactionsread 8 October 2026

There was a time when publishing a scientific article took months or years of peer review in paper journals. That evolved into electronic journals, conference proceedings, and preprints. Now, the most astonishing discoveries are being published on GitHub. Evolution is fast!

❤485👍112🔥19❤‍🔥9😭9💯5👎3💔2

7 Oct 2026, 11:29 UTC≈22,500 views925 reactionsread 8 October 2026

ساعاتی پیش، OpenAI با انتشار پیش‌نویس اثبات ۷۲۲ مساله‌ی بسیار چالش‌برانگیز ریاضی توسط یکی از مدل‌های هوش‌مصنوعی پیشگام داخلی‌اش، جامعه‌ی علمی را در بهت و حیرت فرو برد. مساله‌هایی که بسیاری از آن‌ها برای چند دهه باز بودند و حل آن‌ها توسط ریاضی‌دانان بلافاصله به دریافت جایزه‌ی فیلدز منتهی می‌شد. این لحظه‌ای است که یکی از اصلی‌ترین مزایای تکاملی انسان، یعنی حل مساله‌های انتزاعی پیچیده، به چالش کشیده شد. از این پس کشف و…

👍505❤225🤯69🔥61😱24😭14👏13💊5

30 Sept 2026, 10:27 UTC≈23,000 views804 reactionsread 8 October 2026

Posted without readable text

❤686🙏54❤‍🔥32👍15💘5👎3👏3💯2

29 Sept 2026, 17:06 UTC≈24,500 views1,049 reactionsread 8 October 2026

Posted without readable text

❤869❤‍🔥79🙏58👍11🔥11👏6👌5🥰4

29 Sept 2026, 10:45 UTC≈18,300 views686 reactionsread 8 October 2026

Posted without readable text

❤566❤‍🔥49🙏45👍8👏7⚡4💅3💔1

29 Sept 2026, 08:51 UTC≈18,000 views869 reactionsread 8 October 2026

🧬 ویدئوهای درس بیوانفورماتیک پیشرفته ویدئوهای درس بیوانفورماتیک پیشرفته‌ که با فشار بیرونی از درس‌افزار دانشگاه صنعتی آریامهر (شریف) و مکتب‌خونه حذف شده بود، هم‌اکنون در YouTube (لینک) به همه‌ی دانشجویان عزیز تقدیم می‌شود.

❤740🙏61❤‍🔥27😍14👏13👍6💅2🔥2

28 Sept 2026, 05:22 UTC≈23,600 views1,642 reactionsread 8 October 2026

Posted without readable text

❤1,360🙏128❤‍🔥52😍48👌18🔥12👍10🦄6

13 Sept 2026, 11:50 UTC≈31,200 views487 reactionsread 8 October 2026
Forwarded from @pyteachme

Posted without readable text

❤413❤‍🔥32💔15👍8🔥7😢3🎉2💘2

9 Sept 2026, 20:58 UTC≈39,200 views1,292 reactionsread 8 October 2026

سیل محبت و لطف دانش‌آموزان عزیز و خانواده‌های محترمشان، دوستان عزیزم در تیم PyTeachMe را سرشار از شور و شعف، و مرا شرم‌سار کرده‌است. با آن‌که در روزهای گذشته تلاش کرده‌ام به یکایک پیام‌های پرمهرتان پاسخ دهم، هنوز تعداد بسیاری از پیام‌ها بی‌پاسخ مانده‌است. لطفاً آن را به حساب کم‌توجهی نگذارید. دانش‌آموزان عزیز، نور دیدگان هستند و خدمت به آنان، مایه‌ی افتخار و سربلندی است. ♥️

❤1,150❤‍🔥62👏27🔥22👍11💯6👎4💘3

8 Sept 2026, 16:54 UTC≈48,100 views1,309 reactionsread 8 October 2026
Photo

سام عزیز، نوجوان ۱۳ ساله از یکی از شهرهای کوچک جنوب است. با تلاش بسیار در جمع دانش‌آموزان منتخب قرار گرفت، با جدیت دوره را ادامه داد و امروز گواهی‌نامه‌ی امضا شده توسط رئیس دپارتمان ژنتیک دانشگاه استنفورد را دریافت کرد. امیدوارم همیشه مسیر زندگی او، و همه‌ی دانش‌آموزان، سرشار از نور امید باشد ♥️

❤1,120👏108😍32🔥17👍9🎉5🤗5🤩5

6 Sept 2026, 15:14 UTC≈49,900 views2,191 reactionsread 8 October 2026
Photo

تیام ۱۴ ساله است. مثل خودم، بیماری قلبی مادرزادی دارد و بازهم مثل خودم، بارها قلبش جراحی شده‌است. امروز این نامه را از او دریافت کردم و من هم «دارم پرواز می‌کنم.»

❤1,780❤‍🔥152💔85😭80👏37🕊30😢9🔥8

1 Sept 2026, 16:35 UTC≈47,600 views383 reactionsread 8 October 2026
Forwarded from @RSGIranPhoto

سه روز 📅 یک زبان مشترک: علم . 📣 شاخه دانشجویی انجمن جهانی زیست‌شناسی محاسباتی در ایران، با همکاری SpentaGen برگزار می‌کند: . 🔠 سومین سمینار پیشرفته‌ی (HBC2026) HBC Healthcare, Bioinformatics, and Computational Biology . 🌍 با حضور پژوهشگران و اساتید بین‌المللی در حوزه‌های سلامت، بیوانفورماتیک و زیست‌شناسی محاسباتی🧬👨🏻‍💻 . 🔥 10 سخنران از مراکز علمی معتبر جهان 🌐🎤 💻 3 روز برنامه‌ی علمی »» به‌صورت آنلاین 📃 همراه با ارائه …

❤315👍17👏15🔥15👎8💔4🏆3💯2

Showing the 12 most recent of 42 posts we hold for @sharifizarchi. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 8 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“علی شریفی زارچی - Ali Sharifi Zarchi” (@sharifizarchi), 29,668 subscribers as measured 8 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/sharifizarchi.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.