Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

около SEO | Артёменко Андрей

@seo_okolo

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

618subscribers

+6 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003008305966
TypeChannel
Username@seo_okolo
CreatedBetween 1 August 2025 and 31 October 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/seo_okolo

Growth

611618614.56 August 2026 — 612 subscribers7 August 2026 — 611 subscribers13 August 2026 — 618 subscribers6 August 202613 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 7 days, net +6. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 610–619 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 17:54618+7
7 Aug 2026, 15:36611-1
6 Aug 2026, 22:03612first reading

Engagement

18 posts held, back to 31 March 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
18.3%
avg views ÷ 618 subscribers
Avg views / post
113
1 post measured
Reaction rate
4.42%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
1
of 18 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026
Posts held18 (31 March 20266 August 2026)
Views total113
Reactions total5
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken6 Aug 2026, 22:03 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

312 reactions across 17 posts, in 17 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 42.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥13142.0%
8126.0%
👍4213.5%
😍103.21%
🥰92.88%
🤣72.24%
🤝61.92%
🏆41.28%
😱41.28%
30.962%
👏30.962%
😁30.962%
🫡30.962%
💯20.641%
🤔20.641%
🍾10.321%
👌10.321%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 312reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 31 March 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
13
across the posts below
Posts paid on
7
of 18 we hold a reading for · 39%
Most on one post
5
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @seo_okolo. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 18 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 31 March 2026 to 6 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

6 Aug 2026, 12:29 UTC113 views5 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Canonical на пагинации быть или не быть Сегодня в рубрике «Дурим голову экспертам» молодой отец, но не молодой специалист, известный практически каждому в SEO сфере, Дима Шахов @bablorub 👏 Я прочитал пост в канале @seohowto (один из моих любимых каналов, к слову говоря). После чего у нас в комментариях завязался разговор. Вот сам пост https://t.me/seohowtopro/337 Разговор пошел о том, что большинство используют c

😁31👍1

6 Jul 2026, 09:50 UTC347 views4 reactionsread 6 August 2026

🤖 Обновил своего бота для проверки индексации в Google Прокси, которые изначально были заложены, работают все хуже и хуже. Я вижу по статистике, что многие перестали возвращаться и использовать его. Поэтому логика была переписана и теперь он работает в разы стабильнее и быстрее 🏃‍♀️. Тестируйте и делитесь с друзьями 👉 @google_index_check_bot Запустил я его 3 месяца назад и вот стата: 📊 Статистика бота 👥 Пользо

🔥3🤝1

28 Jun 2026, 08:01 UTC406 views17 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Всем привет 👋 С 3 июня в канале тишина. Был (и до сих пор) в отпуске, отдыхал от гаджетов. Нашёлся хороший повод выйти в эфир. В понедельник 29 июня стартует новый поток курса Михаила Шакина по продвижению англоязычных сайтов — «SEO Шаолинь». Нам хорошие скидки 😉 Я этот курс проходил, и раз уж сам сейчас плотно копаю в сторону буржа, решил оставить честный отзыв. Тем более Миша - мой товарищ, и я знаю, как он раб

🔥8👍6🤝3

4 Jun 2026, 10:20 UTC591 views14 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Иду на курс по внедрению ИИ агентов в SEO-процессы 🤖 Мой знакомый и известный многим мастер/гуру/владыка автоматизаций Влад Папернюк @seo_python_2neuron запускает новый курс. Я хотел попасть на его курс по автоматизации еще в прошлом году, но вечно не хватает времени. В этот раз (сегодня утром) я как только увидел пост с анонсом, сразу же написал Владу, что откладывать больше не намерен. Я в деле! Влада я знаю, ка

🔥12👍1😱1

3 Jun 2026, 07:10 UTC619 views11 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Ух ты! Google добавляет в Search Console отдельные отчеты для AI Overviews и AI Mode. Раньше показы из ИИ ответов мешались с обычными результатами в общем отчете Performance. Теперь выделили отдельный раздел. Что там будет? Показы в AI Overviews, AI Mode, Discover, страницы, страны, устройства, динамика по датам. Клики не показывают 🤷 Пока раскатывают на часть сайтов (начали с Великобритании). UPD. Также в GSC

🔥6🤔21🍾1🤝1

31 May 2026, 09:03 UTC481 views12 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Трофим Михайлец (мужик, который поднимает статус любого мероприятия своим присутствием) высказался про GEO. Поддерживаю 🫡 ________________________ Андрей Артёменко, @seo_okolo #цитаты@seo_okolo

🔥5🤣4🫡3

28 May 2026, 22:29 UTC544 views23 reactions1 Starread 6 August 2026
Photo

Коллеги, только вернулся домой. Всем, кто написал в личку канала и мне в лс, отправил инвайты. 48 штук. Для меня - это успех 🎉 Пусть вам поможет в работе. Пользуйтесь на здоровье 💪 Буду благодарен за любую обратную связь - внутри сервиса есть система тикетов, можно писать туда все баги, пожелания и пр. Спасибо, что были сегодня с нами! upd. заявки продолжают приходить - 65 инвайтов ________________________ Анд

16🔥7

28 May 2026, 14:00 UTC500 views58 reactions1 Starread 6 August 2026
Photo

🏆 Взял 1 место на первом белорусском SEO-кейс чемпионате. Спасибо! Это было неожиданно, но очень приятно. Плюс поднял «котлету» (денежный приз), а это никогда не лишнее) Доклад тоже зашел отлично, я получил огромное количество запросов на инвайт в мой okolo SEO dashboard. Скоро всем вышлю. Конференция продолжается, нетворкинг тоже. ________________________ Андрей Артёменко, @seo_okolo #конференции@seo_okolo

26🔥26👍5👏1

27 May 2026, 09:37 UTC448 views23 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Ну что, презентация готова, увидимся завтра на конференции SEO in Minsk Ребята, я выложился на максимум за последние 2 месяца пока готовил для вас этот материал и, кажется, сделал невозможное для себя. Даже вот презу собирал в последний момент. Я уже получил несколько положительных отзывов от коллег, надеюсь, «зайдет» всем. Буду рад увидеться и пообщаться 🤝 Напоминаю, регистрация начинается в 9.30. Программа тут

🔥144👍3🏆2

21 May 2026, 08:33 UTC527 views15 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Sticker

Sticker, posted without a caption

🥰9🤣3😍3

21 May 2026, 08:33 UTC500 viewsread 6 August 2026
Poll

Стоит ли разбавлять контент канала?

  1. 👍 Да87%
  2. 👎 Нет10%
  3. 💩 Пошел ты...7%

The shares total 104%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

16 May 2026, 08:31 UTC610 views6 reactions1 Starread 6 August 2026

Ссылку на кейс прикрепил к предыдущему посту ☝️ За подготовкой к нему не рассказал вам про интервью, которое записали с Михаилом Скрипником на прошлых выходных. Поговорили про Минск, конференции, цели и планы, будущее. 👉 https://youtu.be/8JCFbBPP04k Миша регулярно записывает интервью с интересными людьми. Вот ссылка на плей-лист «ПроЛюдей». ________________________ Андрей Артёменко, @seo_okolo #видео@seo_okolo #

4🔥2

Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @seo_okolo. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

21 May 2026, 08:33 UTCAnonymous Poll30 voters

Стоит ли разбавлять контент канала?

  1. 👍 Да87%
  2. 👎 Нет10%
  3. 💩 Пошел ты...7%

The shares total 104%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 31 March 2026 to 6 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 704,272 of 1,350,102entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“около SEO | Артёменко Андрей” (@seo_okolo), 618 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/seo_okolo.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.