Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Клуб "Директор по безопасности"

@secdirector

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

3,483subscribers

+4 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001209765839
TypeChannel
Username@secdirector
Created8 December 2018measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/secdirector

Growth

3,4783,4833,480.56 August 2026 — 3,479 subscribers6 August 2026 — 3,478 subscribers9 August 2026 — 3,480 subscribers12 August 2026 — 3,483 subscribers6 August 202612 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 7 days, net +4. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 3,477–3,484 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 23:073,483+3
9 Aug 2026, 13:213,480+2
6 Aug 2026, 09:453,478-1
6 Aug 2026, 08:173,479first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 10 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 3 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
22.8%
avg views ÷ 3,483 subscribers
Avg views / post
794
16 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.90%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
16
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026
Posts held20 (10 July 20266 August 2026)
Views total12,710
Reactions total242
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 23:12 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

289 reactions across 19 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 46.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍13446.4%
🤝3913.5%
🔥3010.4%
💯258.65%
🙏186.23%
👌175.88%
🤔72.42%
🫡62.08%
👏51.73%
🤣31.04%
😱20.692%
10.346%
🍾10.346%
🥱10.346%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 289reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 10 July 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
5
across the posts below
Posts paid on
5
of 20 we hold a reading for · 25%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @secdirector. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 10 July 2026 to 6 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

6 Aug 2026, 08:04 UTC415 views12 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

📣 Приглашаем Вас на вебинар: Красные флаги: чек-лист безопасной работы с Китаем (2.0) 📅 19.08.26, среда 15:00-16:00 (МСК) 📍ОНЛАЙН (участие бесплатное) 📌 Зарегистрироваться 🖥 На вебинаре разберём: ✔️ какие «красные флаги» нельзя игнорировать при выборе китайского партнера; ✔️ как защитить деньги, качество поставок и интеллектуальную собственность; ✔️ какие меры помогут избежать проблем с китайскими контрагентам

👍6🤝3👌2🔥1

6 Aug 2026, 06:43 UTC415 views22 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

📣ВНИМАНИЕ! ГРОМКИЙ СТРИМ-РАЗГОВОР: «СКОЛЬКО СТОИТ БЕЗОПАСНИК?» Мы уже обсудили, чем живут СБ-шники и почему безопасность критически важна для МСБ. Но остался самый нервный, самый закрытый вопрос: ⁉️ СКОЛЬКО ЖЕ НА САМОМ ДЕЛЕ ПОЛУЧАЮТ КОЛЛЕГИ? От директоров до рядовых специалистов - назовём реальные цифры и разложим по полочкам. И самое интересное - сравним Москву/Питер и регионы. Коллеги из регионов! Держитесь за

👍11🤝6🔥3👌1🙏1

5 Aug 2026, 06:45 UTC568 views14 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

📣 Расскажите, как нам улучшить ваш рабочий набор "Проверка контрагентов" Коллеги, мы инициируем сбор обратной связи по нашим контрольным средствам проверок контрагентов. Это не «галочка» - мы действительно намерены учесть ваше мнение и акцентировать внимание на указанных проблемах в рамках нашего VII онлайн-форума-практикума "Контрагенты-2026" Нам нужна ваша откровенная оценка: ✔️ Насколько комфортно вы использует

👍5🔥4🤝3👌1🙏1

4 Aug 2026, 07:10 UTC747 views15 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

📣 Вышел в свет августовский номер журнала «Директор по безопасности» №08-2026 ❗️ Главная тема номера – Контроль закупок В номере можно прочитать о том, как превратить совещания в способ управления вместо его имитации, как построить стратегию безопасности, основанную на доверии, как сделать ИИ полноценным сотрудником компании, занимающимся информационной безопасностью. Кроме того, на страницах журнала поговорим об э

👍6🔥4👏3🤝1🙏1

31 Jul 2026, 09:12 UTC726 views12 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

📣 Инвестиции вместо штрафов: новый правовой механизм управления регуляторными рисками 1. Новая философия контроля Федеральный закон от 26.07.2026 № 250-ФЗ вносит изменения в Кодекс Российской Федерации об административных правонарушениях, закрепляя новую статью 2.9.1. Этот документ меняет фундаментальную парадигму взаимоотношений между бизнесом и государством в сфере контроля: вместо немедленного наказания и взимани

👍6🤝3🙏2🫡1

30 Jul 2026, 07:35 UTC672 views14 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

📣 Риски, которые нельзя игнорировать: мониторинг физлиц и ИП, транспортные лицензии и вакансии В 2026 году риски меняются быстрее, чем можно осознать: сегодня партнёр платёжеспособен, а завтра — судится или на грани ликвидации. Чтобы вы не упускали ранние сигналы, в «Ирбисе» появились новые инструменты для системного контроля контрагентов. Ниже — четыре новых направления. Мониторинг физических лиц и предпринимателе

👍6👌2🙏21💯1🔥1🫡1

29 Jul 2026, 11:03 UTC803 views15 reactionsread 7 August 2026

📣 Загрузил коммерческую тайну в нейросеть - лишился работы и «золотого парашюта». На этой неделе Бабушкинский суд Москвы опубликовал показательное решение, которое должно стать сигналом для каждого, кто использует ИИ-сервисы в рабочих целях. Топ-менеджер инженерной компании уволена за разглашение коммерческой тайны через сервис ИИ DeepSeek, и суд признал это абсолютно законным. Разбираем детали кейса с точки зрения

👍6💯3🤔3🤝2🙏1

29 Jul 2026, 06:45 UTC616 views14 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

📣 7-8 августа в Москве пройдет II бизнес-форум «Свои люди» по вопросам экономической безопасности, управления рисками и человеческому фактору в бизнесе. Организаторы объединили на одной площадке 3 ключевые функции, от которых зависит устойчивость компании: 1. Стратегическое управление. Для собственников и ведущих компаний, которые хотят перестроить службу безопасности из «карательного органа» и затратной статьи бюд

🔥6👍4🫡2👏1🤝1

28 Jul 2026, 07:24 UTC695 views14 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

📣 Верификация физических лиц. 4 зоны контроля, 25 критериев, 40+ источников Дефицит кадров вынуждает бизнес снижать планку требований, но цена ошибки найма при этом только растет. Интеллектуальная система «ДельтаБезопасность» превращает глубокую проверку кандидатов в высокоскоростной автоматический фильтр, защищая компанию от угроз без замедления бизнес-процессов. Защита от «двойников» и ошибок: умные алгоритмы, ав

👍5🔥4💯3🤝1🫡1

27 Jul 2026, 06:44 UTC708 views13 reactions1 Starread 7 August 2026

📣 Битва с призраками: как ИИ превращает BEC-атаки в фатальную угрозу для бизнеса Уважаемые коллеги! Мы привыкли считать киберугрозы уделом ИТ-отделов. Фишинг, вирусы, взломы серверов – всё это технические проблемы, которые решаются антивирусами и межсетевыми экранами. Но сегодня на наших глазах рождается новый класс угроз, перед которыми бессильны любые традиционные средства защиты. Речь идёт о Business Email Compr

👍5💯4🤝2🔥1🙏1

24 Jul 2026, 11:20 UTC≈1,240 views13 reactions1 Starread 7 August 2026
Photo

📣 Почему безопасность - это не просто щит, а навигация в непрерывности бизнеса Когда в большом бизнесе случается настоящая беда, все взгляды устремляются в одну точку. Не на юристов с их оговорками, не на пиарщиков с их меморандумами, и даже не на генерального с его решительным лицом. Все смотрят на него - на человека, отвечающего за безопасность. И в этот момент он абсолютно один. Не потому, что команда слаба, а по

💯5👍2🔥2🤝2🫡1🙏1

22 Jul 2026, 06:45 UTC911 views16 reactions1 Starread 7 August 2026
Photo

📣 Как ЕНС превратился в мишень для мошенников В корпоративной безопасности есть негласный закон: самая опасная угроза - та, которую мы привыкли считать частью надёжного фона. Налоговый мониторинг, электронные сервисы, единый налоговый счёт - всё это воспринимается как технологический щит. Однако практика последних полутора лет показывает: щит может работать на атакующего, если внутри системы остаётся слепая зона. В

👍7🙏3🤝2🍾1👌1🤣1🥱1

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @secdirector. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

14 Jul 2026, 06:45 UTCAnonymous Poll132 voters

Согласны ли вы с тезисом: «Служба безопасности не должна тормозить бизнес, а должна давать ему право на риск, подтверждённое фактами»?

  1. Полностью согласен, это снимает страх и ускоряет решения.51%
  2. Согласен, но только для крупного бизнеса с комплаенсом.36%
  3. Не согласен: закон важнее выживания любой ценой.8%
  4. Затрудняюсь, у нас СБ никогда так не работала.6%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 10 July 2026 to 6 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 155,219 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 7 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Клуб "Директор по безопасности"” (@secdirector), 3,483 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/secdirector.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.