Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

ICSA

@ICSA_NEWS

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1,055subscribers

+2 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001853869652
TypeChannel
Username@ICSA_NEWS
CreatedBetween 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged2 times, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/ICSA_NEWS

Growth

1,0531,0551,0546 August 2026 — 1,053 subscribers6 August 2026 — 1,053 subscribers9 August 2026 — 1,055 subscribers6 August 20269 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 3 days, net +2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,053–1,055 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
9 Aug 2026, 00:501,055+2
6 Aug 2026, 12:511,053no change
6 Aug 2026, 08:181,053first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 16 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
45.4%
avg views ÷ 1,055 subscribers
Avg views / post
479
7 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.984%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
7
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 4 August 2026
Posts held20 (16 June 20264 August 2026)
Views total3,354
Reactions total33
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken6 Aug 2026, 12:51 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

118 reactions across 17 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 50.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥5950.0%
👍4134.7%
75.93%
54.24%
🤝32.54%
❤‍🔥10.847%
🆒10.847%
🏆10.847%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 118reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 16 June 2026 to 4 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

4 Aug 2026, 07:20 UTC213 views7 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

📣 Вышел в свет августовский номер журнала «Директор по безопасности» №08-2026 ❗️ Главная тема номера – Контроль закупок В номере можно прочитать о том, как превратить совещания в способ управления вместо его имитации, как построить стратегию безопасности, основанную на доверии, как сделать ИИ полноценным сотрудником компании, занимающимся информационной безопасностью. Кроме того, на страницах журнала поговорим об э

👍51🔥1

4 Aug 2026, 05:45 UTC267 views9 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Добрый день, друзья! Сегодня все обсуждают искусственный интеллект, и уже ясно, что в сфере безопасности он становится сильным оружием. Но ИИ живёт на данных и помогает только тогда, когда они качественные, — а наши данные во многом рождаются на земле: на складах и кухнях, в торговых залах, цехах и на постах охраны. Единственный способ превратить этот физический мир в данные для анализа — хорошо известные нам чек-л

👍4🔥32

28 Jul 2026, 13:17 UTC495 views2 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

7-8 августа в Москве пройдет II бизнес-форум «Свои люди» по вопросам экономической безопасности, управления рисками и человеческому фактору в бизнесе. Организаторы объединили на одной площадке 3 ключевые функции, от которых зависит устойчивость компании: 1. Стратегическое управление. Для собственников и ведущих компаний, которые хотят перестроить службу безопасности из «карательного органа» и затратной статьи бюдже

🔥2

25 Jul 2026, 05:46 UTC565 views6 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

22 июля прошел вебинар ICSA с Сергеем Тридневко «Антикоррупционный комплаенс как стратегическая функция. Новая реальность корпоративной безопасности». Главный вывод вебинара: сегодня антикоррупционный комплаенс — это уже не вопрос соблюдения законодательства. Это вопрос сохранения бизнеса, репутации и личной безопасности руководителей. Несколько тезисов, которые особенно запомнились: • Комплаенс защищает не только

🔥3👍21

22 Jul 2026, 15:51 UTC551 views1 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Коллеги, через 10 минут мы начинаем вебинар. Подключаетесь!

❤‍🔥1

21 Jul 2026, 07:00 UTC598 views3 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

🔥 ICSA продолжает серию экспертных вебинаров! Когда говорят об антикоррупционном комплаенсе, большинство представляет работу юристов и внутренние политики. Сегодня же комплаенс становится частью корпоративной безопасности и инструментом управления рисками бизнеса. 🎤 Спикер: Сергей Тридневко — эксперт с более чем 25-летним опытом в сфере корпоративной безопасности и Compliance. 📌 На вебинаре обсудим: 🔹 Почему ант

🔥21

17 Jul 2026, 07:58 UTC665 views5 reactionsread 6 August 2026

🌍 Приглашение от ICSA ✅Коллеги, присоединяйтесь! Наши друзья — компания «Леонардо Аналитикс» продолжает делиться практикой и приглашает на вебинар на тему: «OSINT 3.0: эффективная проверка иностранных физических лиц» 🗓️22.07.26, среда ⏰15:00-16:00 по МСК 📢Онлайн-формат ➡️ ЗАРЕГИСТРИРОВАТЬСЯ Участие бесплатное! ➡️СПИКЕР Вебинар ориентирован на руководителей: • комплаенс-подразделений • юридических департаментов

👍5

10 Jul 2026, 14:31 UTC774 views6 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Коллеги, приветствуем! Вчера, 9 июля (в четверг), состоялся наш очередной, ставший уже традиционным вебинар. Тема встречи была максимально практической и вызвала живой интерес у участников: «Анализ неструктурированных данных в контексте задач подразделения службы безопасности» Как превратить данные, которые уже есть в компании, в инструмент контроля бизнес-процессов, расследований и выявления рисков? 👤 Спикер веб

👍51

9 Jul 2026, 15:52 UTC573 viewsread 6 August 2026

Коллеги, в 19:00 мы начинаем вебинар! Подключаетесь!

6 Jul 2026, 10:08 UTC796 views3 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

🔥 ICSA продолжает серию экспертных вебинаров! Друзья, мы снова в эфире. Следующая встреча будет посвящена теме, которая становится всё более важной для современной службы безопасности: как использовать данные, которые уже есть в компании, но часто остаются незамеченными. Видеонаблюдение, СКУД, технические средства охраны, датчики, промышленный интернет вещей, edge-модули, метаданные — всё это может быть не просто и

👍21

3 Jul 2026, 08:56 UTC603 views6 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Новости от партнеров! 📣 Кадры решают все! Светлые головы управленцев отрасли безопасности сегодня забиты глобальными задачами – стратегия, ключевые показатели эффективности, системное управление рисками, автоматизация, искусственный интеллект, требования регуляторов, влияние на свободный денежный поток. Все это бесспорно важные вещи… когда базовые процессы выстроены качественно и эффективно. К чему это мы? Кадрова

👍3🔥3

1 Jul 2026, 11:22 UTC543 views7 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Новости от партнеров! 📣 Вышел в свет июльский номер журнала «Директор по безопасности» №07-2026 ❗️ Главная тема номера – Человеческий фактор В номере можно прочитать о том, что такое “каскадный контроль” и как с ним взаимодействовать, почему российский бизнес кредитует контрагентов, от которых отказались банки, как минимизировать внутренние угрозы в компании. Кроме того, на страницах журнала обсуждается, как разоб

🔥61

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @ICSA_NEWS. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 712,947 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“ICSA” (@ICSA_NEWS), 1,055 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ICSA_NEWS.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.