Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

ㅤᏢ𝗥𝗜𝗡𝗖𝗘'ㅤ ⥹‌ㅤ 𝖣𝖤ㅤ 𝓐𝖱𝖦𝖤𝖭𝖳𝖨𝖭𝖠.

@sebasdaily

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

262subscribers

-8 since we began measuring on 11 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002363867811
TypeChannel
Username@sebasdaily
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded11 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held2
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/sebasdaily

Growth

26227026611 Aug 2026, 21:31 — 270 subscribers12 Aug 2026, 21:53 — 262 subscribers11 Aug 2026, 21:3112 Aug 2026, 21:53
2 measurements spanning 1 day, net -8. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 261–271 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 21:53262-8
11 Aug 2026, 21:31270first reading

Engagement

12 posts held, back to 11 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
4.23%
avg views ÷ 262 subscribers
Avg views / post
11.1
12 posts measured
Reaction rate
22.9%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
12
of 12 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 6 of 12 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 August 2026
Posts held12 (11 August 202611 August 2026)
Views total133
Reactions total16
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken11 Aug 2026, 21:31 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
1m 21s
Average length
27s

Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

16 reactions across 6 posts, in 1 kind.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 492502280629649626216100.0%

Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it isTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 6 of the 12 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 16reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 12 most recent posts we hold, published 11 August 2026 to 11 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

11 Aug 2026, 17:24 UTC5 views2 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

𝙽°𝟣 𝖾𝗇 𝗋𝙞𝗍𝗆𝗈 𝘆 #𝗇𝙤𝘁𝗂𝖼𝗂𝖺𝖘🦈 🦈𝓲𝗇𝗊𝗎𝖾𝖻𝗋𝖺𝗇𝗍𝖺𝖻𝗅𝓮… 🦈𝒘𝖎𝑟𝑠𝗿𝙚𝑑 🦈 ¡𝙴𝚚𝚞𝚒𝚙𝚘 𝚌𝚘𝚗𝚏𝚒𝚛𝚖𝚊𝚍𝚘! 🏁✨ 𝙻𝚊 #𝗘𝘀𝗰𝘂𝗱𝗲𝗿𝗶𝗮𝗥𝗮𝗱𝗶𝗼𝗗𝗶𝘀𝗻𝗲𝘆 𝚢𝚊 𝚝𝚒𝚎𝚗𝚎 𝚊 𝚜𝚞𝚜 𝚙𝚒𝚕𝚘𝚝𝚘𝚜 𝚙𝚊𝚛𝚊 𝚕𝚊 𝚙𝚛𝚘́𝚡𝚒𝚖𝚊 𝚌𝚊𝚛𝚛𝚎𝚛𝚊: 🦈𝘀𝗲𝗯𝗮𝘀𝘁𝗶𝗮𝗻𝗿𝗲𝗲𝗱, 🦈𝗹𝗮𝘂𝘁𝗮𝗿𝗼_𝗿𝗼𝗱𝗿𝗶𝗴𝘂𝗲𝘇 𝚢 🦈𝗺𝗮𝗹𝗲𝗻𝗮𝗿𝗮𝘁𝗻𝗲𝗿. 🏎️🔥 🦈🦈🦈🦈🦈🦈🦈🦈 🦈

custom 49250228062964962622

11 Aug 2026, 17:19 UTC7 views2 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

𝙽°𝟣 𝖾𝗇 𝗋𝙞𝗍𝗆𝗈 𝘆 #𝗇𝙤𝘁𝗂𝖼𝗂𝖺𝖘🦈 🦈𝓲𝗇𝗊𝗎𝖾𝖻𝗋𝖺𝗇𝗍𝖺𝖻𝗅𝓮… 🦈𝒘𝖎𝑟𝑠𝗿𝙚𝑑 🦈 ¡𝙷𝚘𝚢 𝚟𝚞𝚎𝚕𝚟𝚎 𝚕𝚊 𝚟𝚎𝚕𝚘𝚌𝚒𝚍𝚊𝚍! 🏎️💨 🚦𝙻𝚊 𝚙𝚒𝚜𝚝𝚊 𝚎𝚜𝚙𝚎𝚛𝚊 𝚊 𝚕𝚘𝚜 𝚙𝚒𝚕𝚘𝚝𝚘𝚜 𝚙𝚊𝚛𝚊 𝚞𝚗𝚊 𝚗𝚞𝚎𝚟𝚊 𝚏𝚎𝚌𝚑𝚊 𝚍𝚎 🦈𝗳𝗼𝗿𝗺𝘂𝗹𝗮𝘀𝘁𝗿𝗲𝗮𝗺𝗲𝗿𝘀. 𝙿𝚛𝚎𝚙𝚊𝚛𝚊́ 𝚕𝚘𝚜 𝚖𝚘𝚝𝚘𝚛𝚎𝚜 𝚢 𝚍𝚒𝚜𝚏𝚛𝚞𝚝𝚊́ 𝚍𝚎 𝚞𝚗𝚊 𝚌𝚊𝚛𝚛𝚎𝚛𝚊 𝚓𝚞𝚗𝚝𝚘 𝚊 @𝚜𝚑𝚎𝚕𝚕_𝚊𝚛𝚐𝚎𝚗𝚝𝚒𝚗𝚊, @𝚜𝚝𝚒𝚑𝚕_𝚊𝚛 𝚢 @𝚙𝚑𝚒𝚕𝚒𝚙𝚜𝚊𝚛𝚐. 🔥 🦈🦈🦈🦈🦈🦈🦈🦈 🦈

custom 49250228062964962622

11 Aug 2026, 17:10 UTC7 views2 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

𝖓°𝟣 𝖾𝗇 𝗋𝙞𝗍𝗆𝗈 𝘆 #𝗇𝙤𝘁𝗂𝖼𝗂𝖺𝖘 🦈 🦈𝓲𝗇𝗊𝗎𝖾𝖻𝗋𝖺𝗇𝗍𝖺𝖻𝗅𝓮… 🦈𝒘𝖎𝑟𝑠𝗿𝙚𝑑 🦈 🦈🦈🦈 🦈🦈🦈🦈🦈🦈🦈🦈🦈 🦈 ㅤ

custom 49250228062964962622

11 Aug 2026, 02:51 UTC21 views4 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Video

𝙽°𝟣 𝖾𝗇 𝗋𝙞𝗍𝗆𝗈 𝘆 #𝗇𝙤𝘁𝗂𝖼𝗂𝖺𝖘🦈 🦈𝓲𝗇𝗊𝗎𝖾𝖻𝗋𝖺𝗇𝗍𝖺𝖻𝗅𝓮… 🦈𝒘𝖎𝑟𝑠𝗿𝙚𝑑 🦈 ¿𝙴𝚜𝚝𝚊́𝚗 𝚕𝚒𝚜𝚝𝚘𝚜 𝚙𝚊𝚛𝚊 𝚎𝚜𝚝𝚎 𝚖𝚊𝚛𝚝𝚎𝚜? ¡𝙻𝚘𝚜 𝚖𝚘𝚝𝚘𝚛𝚎𝚜 𝚜𝚎 𝚎𝚜𝚝𝚊́𝚗 𝚌𝚊𝚕𝚎𝚗𝚝𝚊𝚗𝚍𝚘! 🦈🦈🦈🦈🦈🦈🦈🦈 🦈

custom 49250228062964962624

11 Aug 2026, 02:31 UTC17 views3 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Video

ㅤ 🦈 🦈𝖭𝗎́𝗆𝖾𝗋𝗈 𝗎𝗇𝗈 𝗇𝗈 𝗌𝗈𝗅𝗈 𝖾𝗇 𝗅𝗈𝗌 𝖼𝗁𝖺𝗋𝗍𝗌! 🦈🦈 🦈 🦈🦈 🦈 🦈🦈🦈 🦈🦈🦈🦈🦈🦈🦈🦈🦈🦈🦈

custom 49250228062964962623

11 Aug 2026, 02:21 UTC13 views3 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

ᅟᅟ ✶ ׁ ʿ 🇦🇷 𝓮́𝗅 𝗉𝗋𝗂́𝗇𝖼𝗂𝗉𝖾 ׅ𝖽𝖾 𝒂𝗿𝗴𝗲𝗻𝘁𝗶𝗻𝗮🦈 ¡ 𝘁𝗁𝗂𝗌 𝗂𝗌 🦈 𝔀𝗂𝗋𝗌𝗿𝗲𝖽 ! 𝗏𝗂𝖺 ✉️𝗲𝗲𝗱 🌟 🦈 🦈🦈🦈🦈🦈 🦈𝙰𝚢𝚎𝚛 𝚏𝚞𝚎 𝚞𝚗 𝚐𝚛𝚊𝚗 𝚍ɪ́𝚊, 𝚗𝚘𝚜 𝚕𝚕𝚎𝚟𝚊𝚖𝚘𝚜 𝚎𝚕 𝚙𝚛𝚒𝚖𝚎𝚛 𝚙𝚞𝚎𝚜𝚝𝚘!!! 🦈𝚏𝚘𝚛𝚖𝚞𝚕𝚊𝚜𝚝𝚛𝚎𝚊𝚖𝚎𝚛𝚜 🦈𝚎𝚜𝚙𝚗𝚊𝚛𝚐𝚎𝚗𝚝𝚒𝚗𝚊 🦈𝚛𝚊𝚍𝚒𝚘𝚍𝚒𝚜𝚗𝚎𝚢𝚊𝚛 🏆🔥 🦈 🦈🦈 𝟤͟𝟥͟ 𝖽͟𝖾͟ 𝖽͟𝗂͟𝖼͟𝗂͟𝖾͟𝗆͟𝖻͟𝗋͟𝖾͟ 𝖽͟𝖾͟ 𝟤͟𝟢͟𝟤͟𝟧 ᅟᅟ

custom 49250228062964962623

Showing the 12 most recent of 12 posts we hold for @sebasdaily. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 41,620 of 1,350,102entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 22 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

✿︎ ࣪ 𝓫𝖺𝗋𝖻𝗂𝖾𝗓 𝔀𝗈𝗋𝗅𝖽’
@barbielatinav · 120
7 posts
⬪ ᳝ າ 𝒿𝖺︩︪𝗎𝗋𝖾𝗀𝗎𝗂 𝗌𝒐𝗎𝗋𝖼𝖾 .ᐟ
@laurenjaureguisource · 202
5 posts
⋆ ◞ 𝒍𝔞 𝖉𝚛𝚊𝚐𝑜𝚗𝑎, ʅ𝗈𝗅𝖺 𝔦𝗇𝖽𝗂𝗀𝗈 ⸃
@dragonasource · 61
4 posts
⋆. 𓄹 𝗠𝖠𝖭𝖴𝖤𝖫𝐓𝐔𝗥𝗜𝑍𝗢 : 𝗨𝗣𝖣𝖠𝖳𝖤’𝖲
@turizoupdate · 576
4 posts
ㅤ──── ⊳ ㅤ𝗘𝗗͟𝖲͟𝖧𝖤𝖤𝖱𝖠𝖭 𝖧𝖰 ᵎ
@mathemztics · 121
3 posts
٫ ⋆ 𝗧𝖠𝖸𝖫𝖮𝖱𝗡𝖠𝖳𝖨𝖮𝖭 .’
@swiftnationrp · 851
3 posts
۪ ֹ 𝗰𝓱͟𝖺͟𝗋͟𝗅͟𝗂 ⋆ 𝘅𝚌𝘅 ׂ 𓈒 𝗌𝗈𝚞𝗿𝗰𝚎 .
@xcxsource · 147
3 posts
◤ ' ‹• Bαɾɾισ Aɳƚισϙυια •› '◢
@BarrioAntioquia · 101
2 posts
ㅤㅤ│𝗯𝗶𝗴𝘁𝗶𝗺𝗲︩︪𝗇𝖺𝗍𝗂𝗈𝗇
@bigtimenation · 36
2 posts
𝙉𝙞𝙖𝙡𝙡 𝙃𝙤𝙧𝙖𝙣 - 𝘿𝙖𝙞𝙡𝙮 🇮🇪
@niall_updates · 84
2 posts
❛ ᅟᅟ 𝒜𝐃𝐄𝐋𝐄'𝐒﹕𝗪𝗢𝗥𝗟𝗗
@accessadele · 253
1 post
˚ ༘✶ 𝗗̅𝗮̅𝗶̅𝗹̅𝘆̅💪🏻• chrıs𝗕𝗔𝗜𝗭𝗘𝗡!
@baizendaily · 38
1 post
REFORM. || 𝖻𝗎𝗇𝗇𝔂𝖽𝗋𝖾𝖺𝗆𝗌.
@beerdaily · 97
1 post
ㅤᎷ𝖴𝖲𝖤ㅤ𝘰𝒇ㅤ𝓑𝖤𝖫𝖫𝖮𝐃𝗥𝗔𝗠𝗔.
@bellodrama · 30
1 post
𝗠𝗢𝗩𝗘𝗗!ㅤ𑫋𝖫𝖫𝖠𝙍𝗘𝗘𝗗
@enmoved · 102
1 post
🌙𝙇𝙪𝙖𝙣͟𝙎𝘢𝘯𝘵𝘢𝘯𝘢 𝘋𝘢𝘪𝘭𝘺 ᯟ⍣
@gurizinhx · 51
1 post
𝓵𝗼𝗹𝗮 𝓲𝗇𝖽𝗂𝗀𝗈'𝓈 𝘀𝗼𝚞𝚛𝚌𝚎 .𝄒
@indigosource · 64
1 post
ㅤ𝙹𝚄𝙽𝙸𝙽𝙰ㅤ𔗨ㅤ𝗠𝖠𝖭𝖣𝖠𝗖𝖠𝖱𝖴 ...
@juninarp · 25
1 post
ㅤㅤׅ ׄ ﹫𝖺𝖼𝖼𝖾𝗌𝗌͟𝗺͟𝗶𝗼𝘁𝗼 ‹
@miotando · 92
1 post
Hiatus. ‧₊˚ ☽ • 𝒾𝗍'𝗌 𝗍𝗁𝖾 𝗐𝗈𝗋𝗅𝖽 𝗈𝖿 𝗁𝖻
@missfearles · 40
1 post
ᅟ🍂 ᅟᅟ𝗖𝗔𝗡𝗔𝗗𝗜𝗔𝗡ᅟBOYᅟ𝟗͟𝟖ᅟ.ᐟ
@smendesupdts · 89
1 post
𝗖𝗢𝗔𝗖𝗛𝗘𝗟𝗟𝗔
@VALLEYCHELLA · 102
1 post

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“ㅤᏢ𝗥𝗜𝗡𝗖𝗘'ㅤ ⥹‌ㅤ 𝖣𝖤ㅤ 𝓐𝖱𝖦𝖤𝖭𝖳𝖨𝖭𝖠.” (@sebasdaily), 262 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/sebasdaily.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.