Channel
@mathemztics
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
121subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 11 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002404267807 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @mathemztics |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 11 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 11 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 11 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/mathemztics |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Aug 2026, 22:54 | 121 | no change |
| 11 Aug 2026, 21:31 | 121 | first reading |
18 posts held, back to 21 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 2 of 6 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 22 July 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 18 (21 June 2026 – 22 July 2026) |
| Views total | 156 |
| Reactions total | 5 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 11 Aug 2026, 21:31 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
15 reactions across 6 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 60.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 💘 | 9 | 60.0% | |
| 🔥 | 6 | 40.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 6 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 15reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 21 June 2026 to 22 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
⠀ ⠀⠀ 🤩 🤩﹫𝗲𝗱𝗌𝗁𝖾𝖾𝗋𝖺𝗇͟𝗯͟𝗿 ⠀ 𝗎𝗉𝖽𝖺𝗍𝖾 ᠉ 𝗏𝗂𝖺 𝗶𝗀 𝗳𝖾𝖾𝖽. ⠀ ⠀⠀ 𝖯𝗈𝗋 𝖺𝗊𝗎𝗂 𝖺 𝗀𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾 𝖠𝖬𝖠 𝖾𝗌𝗌𝖺 𝖺𝗆𝗂𝗓𝖺𝖽𝖾! 𝖲𝗁𝖺𝗄𝗂𝗋𝖺 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗏𝗂𝖽𝗈𝗎 𝖤𝖽 𝖲𝗁𝖾𝖾𝗋𝖺𝗇 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝖺 𝗌𝖾𝗎 𝗌𝗁𝗈𝗐 𝗈𝗇𝗍𝖾𝗆! 𝖤𝗅𝖾𝗌 𝖺𝗉𝗋𝖾𝗌𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖺𝗋𝖺𝗆 𝗎𝗆 𝖽𝗎𝖾𝗍𝗈 𝖽𝖾 ‘𝖴𝗇𝖽𝖾𝗋𝗇𝖾𝖺𝗍𝗁 𝖸𝗈𝗎𝗋 𝖢𝗅𝗈𝗍𝗁𝖾𝗌’ 𝗇𝗈 𝖡𝖺𝗋𝖼𝗅𝖺𝗒’𝗌 𝖢𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾𝗋, 𝖭𝗈𝗏𝖺 𝖨𝗈𝗋𝗊𝗎𝖾. ⠀ ⠀ ─────────── ⓒ 𝖺𝗅𝗅 𝗍𝗁𝖾 𝖼𝗋𝖾𝖽𝗂𝗍𝗌 𝗀𝗈 𝗍𝗈 ﹫𝗺𝗮𝘁𝗵𝗲𝗺𝘇𝘁𝗶𝗰𝘀. ⠀⠀
💘2🔥1
Sticker, posted without a caption
⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀ #𝗟𝗜𝗦𝗧𝗛𝗢𝗨𝗦𝗘 𝒞𝗈𝗇𝗁𝖾ç𝖺 𝖺 𝒍𝗂𝗌𝗍𝖺 𝖽𝖾 𝒂𝗋𝗍𝗂𝗌𝗍𝖺𝗌 ɴ𝗈 𝗎𝗇𝗂𝗏𝖾𝗋𝗌𝗈 𝖽ᴏ 𝕣𝗈𝗅𝖾𝗉𝗅𝖺𝗒 𝕘𝖺𝗆𝖾. ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ࣪ ⭒𝐌𝗮𝗱𝗶𝘀𝗼𝗻 𝓑𝗲𝗲𝗿៹ ࣪ › 𝓢𝗲𝗯𝗮𝘀𝘁𝗶𝗮𝗻 𝐑𝗲𝗲𝗱 ֗ ࣪ ⭒𝐄𝗹𝗹𝗮 𝐑𝗲𝗲𝗱៹ ࣪ › 𝓛𝗼𝗹𝗮 𝐈𝗻𝗱𝗶𝗴𝗼 ֗ ࣪ ⭒𝐂𝗮𝗺𝗶𝗹𝗮 𝐂𝗮𝗯𝗲𝗹𝗹𝗼៹ ࣪ › 𝐀𝗱𝗲𝗹𝗲 ֗ ࣪ ⭒𝓛𝗮𝗹𝗶 𝐄𝘀𝗽𝗼𝘀𝗶𝘁𝗼៹ ࣪ › 𝐌𝗮𝗻𝘂𝗲𝗹 𝐓𝘂𝗿𝗶𝘇𝗼 ֗ ࣪ ⭒𝐋𝗮𝘂𝗿𝗲𝗻 𝐉𝗮𝘂𝗿𝗲𝗴𝘂𝗶 ៹ ࣪ › 𝓒𝗵𝗮𝗿𝗹𝗶 𝐗𝗰𝘅 ֗ ࣪ ⭒𝐓𝗮𝘁𝗲 𝐌𝗰𝗿𝗮𝗲៹ ࣪ › 𝐄𝗱 𝓢𝗵𝗲𝗲𝗿𝗮𝗻 ֗ ࣪ ⭒𝐌𝗮𝗻𝘂𝗲𝗹𝗮 𝐐𝗺៹ ࣪ › 𝓓𝗼𝘃𝗲 𝐂𝗮𝗺𝗲𝗿𝗼𝗻 ֗ ࣪ ⭒𝓞𝗹𝗶𝘃𝗶𝗮 𝐑𝗼𝗱𝗿𝗶…
Sticker, posted without a caption
File, posted without a caption
🤩 𝗗𝗥𝗨𝗡𝗞 𝗦𝗜𝗗𝗘 🤩 𝐆𝗎𝗌𝗍𝖺𝗏𝗈 𝐌𝗂𝗈𝗍𝗈 🥃 ᅟᅟ ─────────── ⓒ 𝖺𝗅𝗅 𝗍𝗁𝖾 𝖼𝗋𝖾𝖽𝗂𝗍𝗌 𝗀𝗈 𝗍𝗈 ﹫𝖺𝖼𝖼𝖾𝗌𝗌͟𝗺͟𝗶𝗼𝘁𝗼 .’ ⠀ ⠀⠀
💘1🔥1
Sticker, posted without a caption
⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀ #𝗟𝗜𝗦𝗧𝗛𝗢𝗨𝗦𝗘 𝒞𝗈𝗇𝗁𝖾ç𝖺 𝖺 𝒍𝗂𝗌𝗍𝖺 𝖽𝖾 𝒂𝗋𝗍𝗂𝗌𝗍𝖺𝗌 ɴ𝗈 𝗎𝗇𝗂𝗏𝖾𝗋𝗌𝗈 𝖽ᴏ 𝕣𝗈𝗅𝖾𝗉𝗅𝖺𝗒 𝕘𝖺𝗆𝖾. ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ࣪ ⭒𝐌𝗮𝗱𝗶𝘀𝗼𝗻 𝓑𝗲𝗲𝗿៹ ࣪ › 𝓢𝗲𝗯𝗮𝘀𝘁𝗶𝗮𝗻 𝐑𝗲𝗲𝗱 ֗ ࣪ ⭒𝐄𝗹𝗹𝗮 𝐑𝗲𝗲𝗱៹ ࣪ › 𝓛𝗼𝗹𝗮 𝐈𝗻𝗱𝗶𝗴𝗼 ֗ ࣪ ⭒𝐂𝗮𝗺𝗶𝗹𝗮 𝐂𝗮𝗯𝗲𝗹𝗹𝗼៹ ࣪ › 𝐀𝗱𝗲𝗹𝗲 ֗ ࣪ ⭒𝓛𝗮𝗹𝗶 𝐄𝘀𝗽𝗼𝘀𝗶𝘁𝗼៹ ࣪ › 𝐌𝗮𝗻𝘂𝗲𝗹 𝐓𝘂𝗿𝗶𝘇𝗼 ֗ ࣪ ⭒𝐋𝗮𝘂𝗿𝗲𝗻 𝐉𝗮𝘂𝗿𝗲𝗴𝘂𝗶 ៹ ࣪ › 𝓒𝗵𝗮𝗿𝗹𝗶 𝐗𝗰𝘅 ֗ ࣪ ⭒𝐓𝗮𝘁𝗲 𝐌𝗰𝗿𝗮𝗲៹ ࣪ › 𝐄𝗱 𝓢𝗵𝗲𝗲𝗿𝗮𝗻 ֗ ࣪ ⭒𝐌𝗮𝗻𝘂𝗲𝗹𝗮 𝐐𝗺៹ ࣪ › 𝓓𝗼𝘃𝗲 𝐂𝗮𝗺𝗲𝗿𝗼𝗻 ֗ ࣪ ⭒𝓞𝗹𝗶𝘃𝗶𝗮 𝐑𝗼𝗱𝗿𝗶…
Sticker, posted without a caption
⠀ ⠀⠀ 🤩 🤩﹫𝗲𝗱𝗌𝗁𝖾𝖾𝗋𝖺𝗇͟𝗯͟𝗿 ⠀ 𝑛𝖾𝗐𝗌: 𝐜𝗁𝖺𝗋𝗍𝗌 𝐮𝗉𝖽𝖺𝗍𝖾. ⠀ ⠀⠀ 𝖯𝖤𝖱𝖥𝖤𝖢𝖳 𝖡𝖠𝖳𝖤 𝟦 𝖡𝖨𝖫𝖧𝖮̃𝖤𝖲 𝖭𝖮 𝖲𝖯𝖮𝖳𝖨𝖥𝖸! 📈 𝖴𝗆𝖺 𝖽𝖺𝗌 𝗆𝗎́𝗌𝗂𝖼𝖺𝗌 𝗆𝖺𝗂𝗌 𝗋𝗈𝗆𝖺̂𝗇𝗍𝗂𝖼𝖺𝗌 𝖽𝗈 𝖼𝖺𝗍𝖺́𝗅𝗈𝗀𝗈 𝖽𝗈 𝗇𝗈𝗌𝗌𝗈 𝗋𝗎𝗂𝗏𝗈, 𝖺𝖼𝖺𝖻𝖺 𝖽𝖾 𝖺𝗅𝖼𝖺𝗇𝖼̧𝖺𝗋 𝖺 𝗆𝖺𝗋𝖼𝖺 𝖽𝖾 𝟦 𝖻𝗂𝗅𝗁𝗈̃𝖾𝗌 𝖽𝖾 𝗌𝗍𝗋𝖾𝖺𝗆𝗌 𝗇𝗈 𝖲𝗉𝗈𝗍𝗂𝖿𝗒. 🩷 𝖠 𝖼𝖺𝗇𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝗌𝖾𝗀𝗎𝖾 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗊𝗎𝗂𝗌𝗍𝖺𝗇𝖽𝗈 𝗈𝗎𝗏𝗂𝗇𝗍𝖾𝗌 𝗇𝗈 𝗆𝗎𝗇𝖽𝗈 𝗂𝗇𝗍𝖾𝗂𝗋𝗈. 𝖰𝗎𝖾𝗆 𝖺ı́ 𝗃𝖺́ 𝗈𝗎𝗏𝗂𝗎 𝗎𝗆𝖺𝗌 𝟧𝟢𝟢 𝗏𝖾𝗓𝖾𝗌 𝗌𝗈𝗓𝗂𝗇𝗁𝗈 𝖽𝖾𝗌𝖽𝖾 𝟤𝟢𝟣𝟩? ⠀ ⠀ ─────────── ⓒ 𝖺𝗅𝗅 𝗍𝗁𝖾 𝖼𝗋𝖾𝖽𝗂𝗍𝗌
💘2🔥1
Sticker, posted without a caption
⠀ ⠀⠀ 🤩 🤩﹫𝗲𝗱𝗌𝗁𝖾𝖾𝗋𝖺𝗇͟𝗯͟𝗿 ⠀ 𝗎𝗉𝖽𝖺𝗍𝖾 ᠉ 𝗏𝗂𝖺 𝗶𝗀 𝗳𝖾𝖾𝖽 ⠀ ⠀⠀ 𝖭𝖠̃𝖮 𝖵𝖠𝖨 𝖲𝖤 𝖠𝖯𝖮𝖲𝖤𝖭- -𝖳𝖠𝖱 𝖣𝗎𝗋𝖺𝗇𝗍𝖾 𝗌𝗁𝗈𝗐 𝗋𝖾𝖼𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾 𝖾𝗆 𝖭𝖺𝗌𝗁𝗏𝗂𝗅𝗅𝖾, 𝖤𝖽 𝖾𝗑𝗉𝗅𝗂𝖼𝗈𝗎 𝖺𝗈 𝗉𝗎́𝖻𝗅𝗂𝖼𝗈 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗇𝖺̃𝗈 𝖾𝗌𝗍𝖺́ 𝖺𝖻𝖺𝗇𝖽𝗈𝗇𝖺𝗇𝖽𝗈 𝖺 𝗆𝗎́𝗌𝗂𝖼𝖺, 𝗇𝖾𝗆 “𝗌𝖾 𝖺𝗉𝗈𝗌𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖺𝗇𝖽𝗈”, 𝖾𝗅𝖾 𝗌𝗈́ 𝗉𝗋𝖾𝗍𝖾𝗇𝖽𝖾 𝖿𝖺𝗓𝖾𝗋 𝗎𝗆𝖺 𝗉𝖺𝗎𝗌𝖺 𝖽𝖺𝗌 𝗍𝗎𝗋𝗇𝖾̂𝗌 𝖽𝖾𝗉𝗈𝗂𝗌 𝖽𝗈 𝖿𝗂𝗆 𝖽𝖺 𝖫𝗈𝗈𝗉 𝖳𝗈𝗎𝗋. #LoopTourNashville. ⠀ ⠀ ─────────── ⓒ 𝖺𝗅𝗅 𝗍𝗁𝖾 𝖼𝗋𝖾𝖽𝗂𝗍𝗌 𝗀𝗈
💘1🔥1
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @mathemztics. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 840,475 of 1,345,403entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 15 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@mathemztics named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ㅤ──── ⊳ ㅤ𝗘𝗗͟𝖲͟𝖧𝖤𝖤𝖱𝖠𝖭 𝖧𝖰 ᵎ” (@mathemztics), 121 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/mathemztics.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.