Channel
@barbielatinav
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
120subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 11 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001622492196 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @barbielatinav |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 11 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 11 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 11 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/barbielatinav |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Aug 2026, 22:52 | 120 | no change |
| 11 Aug 2026, 21:31 | 120 | first reading |
15 posts held, back to 24 April 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 15 posts for this entry, the most recent from 21 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
55 reactions across 1 post, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 50.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 4900347385957320145 | 28 | 50.9% | |
| custom 4900472356620732356 | 27 | 49.1% |
Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 1 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 55reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 24 April 2026 to 21 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀ #𝗟𝗜𝗦𝗧𝗛𝗢𝗨𝗦𝗘 𝒞𝗈𝗇𝗁𝖾ç𝖺 𝖺 𝒍𝗂𝗌𝗍𝖺 𝖽𝖾 𝒂𝗋𝗍𝗂𝗌𝗍𝖺𝗌 ɴ𝗈 𝗎𝗇𝗂𝗏𝖾𝗋𝗌𝗈 𝖽ᴏ 𝕣𝗈𝗅𝖾𝗉𝗅𝖺𝗒 𝕘𝖺𝗆𝖾. ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ࣪ ⭒𝐌𝗮𝗱𝗶𝘀𝗼𝗻 𝓑𝗲𝗲𝗿៹ ࣪ › 𝓢𝗲𝗯𝗮𝘀𝘁𝗶𝗮𝗻 𝐑𝗲𝗲𝗱 ֗ ࣪ ⭒𝐄𝗹𝗹𝗮 𝐑𝗲𝗲𝗱៹ ࣪ › 𝓛𝗼𝗹𝗮 𝐈𝗻𝗱𝗶𝗴𝗼 ֗ ࣪ ⭒𝐂𝗮𝗺𝗶𝗹𝗮 𝐂𝗮𝗯𝗲𝗹𝗹𝗼៹ ࣪ › 𝐀𝗱𝗲𝗹𝗲 ֗ ࣪ ⭒𝓛𝗮𝗹𝗶 𝐄𝘀𝗽𝗼𝘀𝗶𝘁𝗼៹ ࣪ › 𝐌𝗮𝗻𝘂𝗲𝗹 𝐓𝘂𝗿𝗶𝘇𝗼 ֗ ࣪ ⭒𝐋𝗮𝘂𝗿𝗲𝗻 𝐉𝗮𝘂𝗿𝗲𝗴𝘂𝗶 ៹ ࣪ › 𝓒𝗵𝗮𝗿𝗹𝗶 𝐗𝗰𝘅 ֗ ࣪ ⭒𝐓𝗮𝘁𝗲 𝐌𝗰𝗿𝗮𝗲៹ ࣪ › 𝐄𝗱 𝓢𝗵𝗲𝗲𝗿𝗮𝗻 ֗ ࣪ ⭒𝐌𝗮𝗻𝘂𝗲𝗹𝗮 𝐐𝗺៹ ࣪ › 𝓓𝗼𝘃𝗲 𝐂𝗮𝗺𝗲𝗿𝗼𝗻 ֗ ࣪ ⭒𝓞𝗹𝗶𝘃𝗶𝗮 𝐑𝗼𝗱𝗿𝗶…
Sticker, posted without a caption
⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀ #𝗟𝗜𝗦𝗧𝗛𝗢𝗨𝗦𝗘 𝒞𝗈𝗇𝗁𝖾ç𝖺 𝖺 𝒍𝗂𝗌𝗍𝖺 𝖽𝖾 𝒂𝗋𝗍𝗂𝗌𝗍𝖺𝗌 ɴ𝗈 𝗎𝗇𝗂𝗏𝖾𝗋𝗌𝗈 𝖽ᴏ 𝕣𝗈𝗅𝖾𝗉𝗅𝖺𝗒 𝕘𝖺𝗆𝖾. ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ࣪ ⭒𝐌𝗮𝗱𝗶𝘀𝗼𝗻 𝓑𝗲𝗲𝗿៹ ࣪ › 𝓢𝗲𝗯𝗮𝘀𝘁𝗶𝗮𝗻 𝐑𝗲𝗲𝗱 ֗ ࣪ ⭒𝐄𝗹𝗹𝗮 𝐑𝗲𝗲𝗱៹ ࣪ › 𝓛𝗼𝗹𝗮 𝐈𝗻𝗱𝗶𝗴𝗼 ֗ ࣪ ⭒𝓐𝗶𝘁𝗮𝗻𝗮៹ ࣪ › 𝓞𝗺𝗮𝗿 𝐑𝘂𝗱𝗯𝗲𝗿𝗴 ֗ ࣪ ⭒𝐂𝗮𝗺𝗶𝗹𝗮 𝐂𝗮𝗯𝗲𝗹𝗹𝗼៹ ࣪ › 𝐀𝗱𝗲𝗹𝗲 ֗ ࣪ ⭒𝐓𝗮𝘆𝗹𝗼𝗿 𝓢𝘄𝗶𝗳𝘁៹ ࣪ › 𝓛𝗮𝗹𝗶 𝐄𝘀𝗽𝗼𝘀𝗶𝘁𝗼 ֗ ࣪ ⭒𝐌𝗮𝗻𝘂𝗲𝗹 𝐓𝘂𝗿𝗶𝘇𝗼៹ ࣪ › 𝐋𝗮𝘂𝗿𝗲𝗻 𝐉𝗮𝘂𝗿𝗲𝗴𝘂𝗶 ֗ ࣪ ⭒𝓒𝗵𝗮𝗿𝗹𝗶 𝐗𝗰𝘅៹ ࣪ › 𝐓𝗮𝘁𝗲 𝐌𝗰𝗿𝗮𝗲 ֗ ࣪ ⭒𝐄𝗱 𝓢𝗵𝗲𝗲𝗿𝗮𝗻៹ ࣪…
Sticker, posted without a caption
⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀ #𝗟𝗜𝗦𝗧𝗛𝗢𝗨𝗦𝗘 𝒞𝗈𝗇𝗁𝖾ç𝖺 𝖺 𝒍𝗂𝗌𝗍𝖺 𝖽𝖾 𝒂𝗋𝗍𝗂𝗌𝗍𝖺𝗌 ɴ𝗈 𝗎𝗇𝗂𝗏𝖾𝗋𝗌𝗈 𝖽ᴏ 𝕣𝗈𝗅𝖾𝗉𝗅𝖺𝗒 𝕘𝖺𝗆𝖾. ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ࣪ ⭒𝐌𝗮𝗱𝗶𝘀𝗼𝗻 𝓑𝗲𝗲𝗿៹ ࣪ › 𝓢𝗲𝗯𝗮𝘀𝘁𝗶𝗮𝗻 𝐑𝗲𝗲𝗱 ֗ ࣪ ⭒𝐄𝗹𝗹𝗮 𝐑𝗲𝗲𝗱៹ ࣪ › 𝓛𝗼𝗹𝗮 𝐈𝗻𝗱𝗶𝗴𝗼 ֗ ࣪ ⭒𝓐𝗶𝘁𝗮𝗻𝗮៹ ࣪ › 𝓞𝗺𝗮𝗿 𝐑𝘂𝗱𝗯𝗲𝗿𝗴 ֗ ࣪ ⭒𝐂𝗮𝗺𝗶𝗹𝗮 𝐂𝗮𝗯𝗲𝗹𝗹𝗼៹ ࣪ › 𝐀𝗱𝗲𝗹𝗲 ֗ ࣪ ⭒𝐓𝗮𝘆𝗹𝗼𝗿 𝓢𝘄𝗶𝗳𝘁៹ ࣪ › 𝓛𝗮𝗹𝗶 𝐄𝘀𝗽𝗼𝘀𝗶𝘁𝗼 ֗ ࣪ ⭒𝐌𝗮𝗻𝘂𝗲𝗹 𝐓𝘂𝗿𝗶𝘇𝗼៹ ࣪ › 𝐋𝗮𝘂𝗿𝗲𝗻 𝐉𝗮𝘂𝗿𝗲𝗴𝘂𝗶 ֗ ࣪ ⭒𝓒𝗵𝗮𝗿𝗹𝗶 𝐗𝗰𝘅៹ ࣪ › 𝐓𝗮𝘁𝗲 𝐌𝗰𝗿𝗮𝗲 ֗ ࣪ ⭒𝐄𝗱 𝓢𝗵𝗲𝗲𝗿𝗮𝗻៹ ࣪…
Sticker, posted without a caption
⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀ #𝗟𝗜𝗦𝗧𝗛𝗢𝗨𝗦𝗘 𝒞𝗈𝗇𝗁𝖾ç𝖺 𝖺 𝒍𝗂𝗌𝗍𝖺 𝖽𝖾 𝒂𝗋𝗍𝗂𝗌𝗍𝖺𝗌 ɴ𝗈 𝗎𝗇𝗂𝗏𝖾𝗋𝗌𝗈 𝖽ᴏ 𝕣𝗈𝗅𝖾𝗉𝗅𝖺𝗒 𝕘𝖺𝗆𝖾. ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ࣪ ⭒𝐌𝗮𝗱𝗶𝘀𝗼𝗻 𝓑𝗲𝗲𝗿៹ ࣪ › 𝓢𝗲𝗯𝗮𝘀𝘁𝗶𝗮𝗻 𝐑𝗲𝗲𝗱 ֗ ࣪ ⭒𝐄𝗹𝗹𝗮 𝐑𝗲𝗲𝗱៹ ࣪ › 𝓛𝗼𝗹𝗮 𝐈𝗻𝗱𝗶𝗴𝗼 ֗ ࣪ ⭒𝓐𝗶𝘁𝗮𝗻𝗮៹ ࣪ › 𝓞𝗺𝗮𝗿 𝐑𝘂𝗱𝗯𝗲𝗿𝗴 ֗ ࣪ ⭒𝐂𝗮𝗺𝗶𝗹𝗮 𝐂𝗮𝗯𝗲𝗹𝗹𝗼៹ ࣪ › 𝐀𝗱𝗲𝗹𝗲 ֗ ࣪ ⭒𝐓𝗮𝘆𝗹𝗼𝗿 𝓢𝘄𝗶𝗳𝘁៹ ࣪ › 𝓛𝗮𝗹𝗶 𝐄𝘀𝗽𝗼𝘀𝗶𝘁𝗼 ֗ ࣪ ⭒𝐌𝗮𝗻𝘂𝗲𝗹 𝐓𝘂𝗿𝗶𝘇𝗼៹ ࣪ › 𝐋𝗮𝘂𝗿𝗲𝗻 𝐉𝗮𝘂𝗿𝗲𝗴𝘂𝗶 ֗ ࣪ ⭒𝓒𝗵𝗮𝗿𝗹𝗶 𝐗𝗰𝘅៹ ࣪ › 𝐓𝗮𝘁𝗲 𝐌𝗰𝗿𝗮𝗲 ֗ ࣪ ⭒𝐄𝗱 𝓢𝗵𝗲𝗲𝗿𝗮𝗻៹ ࣪…
Sticker, posted without a caption
Photo, posted without a caption
custom 490034738595732014528custom 490047235662073235627
Sticker, posted without a caption
⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀ #𝗟𝗜𝗦𝗧𝗛𝗢𝗨𝗦𝗘 𝒞𝗈𝗇𝗁𝖾ç𝖺 𝖺 𝒍𝗂𝗌𝗍𝖺 𝖽𝖾 𝒂𝗋𝗍𝗂𝗌𝗍𝖺𝗌 ɴ𝗈 𝗎𝗇𝗂𝗏𝖾𝗋𝗌𝗈 𝖽ᴏ 𝕣𝗈𝗅𝖾𝗉𝗅𝖺𝗒 𝕘𝖺𝗆𝖾. ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ࣪ ⭒𝐌𝗮𝗱𝗶𝘀𝗼𝗻 𝓑𝗲𝗲𝗿៹ ࣪ › 𝓢𝗲𝗯𝗮𝘀𝘁𝗶𝗮𝗻 𝐑𝗲𝗲𝗱 ֗ ࣪ ⭒𝐄𝗹𝗹𝗮 𝐑𝗲𝗲𝗱៹ ࣪ › 𝓛𝗼𝗹𝗮 𝐈𝗻𝗱𝗶𝗴𝗼 ֗ ࣪ ⭒𝓐𝗶𝘁𝗮𝗻𝗮៹ ࣪ › 𝓞𝗺𝗮𝗿 𝐑𝘂𝗱𝗯𝗲𝗿𝗴 ֗ ࣪ ⭒𝐂𝗮𝗺𝗶𝗹𝗮 𝐂𝗮𝗯𝗲𝗹𝗹𝗼៹ ࣪ › 𝐀𝗱𝗲𝗹𝗲 ֗ ࣪ ⭒𝐓𝗮𝘆𝗹𝗼𝗿 𝓢𝘄𝗶𝗳𝘁៹ ࣪ › 𝓛𝗮𝗹𝗶 𝐄𝘀𝗽𝗼𝘀𝗶𝘁𝗼 ֗ ࣪ ⭒𝐌𝗮𝗻𝘂𝗲𝗹 𝐓𝘂𝗿𝗶𝘇𝗼៹ ࣪ › 𝐋𝗮𝘂𝗿𝗲𝗻 𝐉𝗮𝘂𝗿𝗲𝗴𝘂𝗶 ֗ ࣪ ⭒𝓒𝗵𝗮𝗿𝗹𝗶 𝐗𝗰𝘅៹ ࣪ › 𝐓𝗮𝘁𝗲 𝐌𝗰𝗿𝗮𝗲 ֗ ࣪ ⭒𝐄𝗱 𝓢𝗵𝗲𝗲𝗿𝗮𝗻៹ ࣪…
Sticker, posted without a caption
Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @barbielatinav. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 911,833 of 1,480,688entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 15 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@barbielatinav named 2 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“✿︎ ࣪ 𝓫𝖺𝗋𝖻𝗂𝖾𝗓 𝔀𝗈𝗋𝗅𝖽’” (@barbielatinav), 120 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/barbielatinav.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.