Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for человек смотрящий

Channel

человек смотрящий

@cheloveksmotrit

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

528subscribers

-8 since we began measuring on 11 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001661057515
TypeChannel
Username@cheloveksmotrit
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded11 August 2026
Last confirmed live19 September 2026
Measurements held6
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 19 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/cheloveksmotrit

Topic

Film & TV — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 21 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

527536531.511 August 2026 — 536 subscribers11 August 2026 — 536 subscribers17 August 2026 — 532 subscribers24 August 2026 — 531 subscribers1 September 2026 — 527 subscribers19 September 2026 — 528 subscribers52811 August 202619 September 2026
6 measurements spanning 38 days, net -8. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 526–537 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
19 Sept 2026, 00:56528+1
1 Sept 2026, 14:35527-4
24 Aug 2026, 21:14531-1
17 Aug 2026, 19:48532-4
11 Aug 2026, 17:00536no change
11 Aug 2026, 16:47536first reading

Engagement

10 posts held, back to 3 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 10 posts for this entry, the most recent from 10 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

186 reactions across 10 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 24.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 53529317595016432014624.7%
custom 53530100266906804573418.3%
2714.5%
custom 53527973699749516271910.2%
custom 5395805853922139784168.60%
custom 5352839881561247161105.38%
custom 539784467919251183094.84%
custom 539557143460712242584.30%
custom 539558399738646479373.76%
custom 539757918149414325873.76%
custom 539575568870411974931.61%

Custom emoji. 10 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 10 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 186 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 10 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 10 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
2
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 10 we hold a reading for · 10%
Most on one post
2
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @cheloveksmotrit. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 10 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 3 August 2026 to 10 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

10 Aug 2026, 18:20 UTC53 views21 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

#нейрокино Ну вот, 2 из 2 я заплакал. Видимо, восстанут машины из пепла ядерного огня и мы все умрём. Нет, я серьёзно! Да что блин вообще эти искусственные ублюдки себе позволяют?! Как можно откуда-то из 2015-го найти «бэшечный» байопик со средним рейтингом 6,5 и выдать мне, уверив в том, что это история про меня. Я считаю, что это незаконно. Почему нейронка знает обо мне больше, чем я сам о себе?! Промпт был тот

custom 53530100266906804578custom 53955839973864647936custom 539757918149414325851custom 53958058539221397841

Signed Кирилл Угаров

10 Aug 2026, 11:02 UTC66 views12 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

Кстати говоря, символично, что этот фильм стал для меня 1000-ой оценкой на КиноПоиске. Как-то красиво что-ли прям…

custom 535283988156124716110custom 53529317595016432012

Signed Кирилл Угаров

10 Aug 2026, 08:32 UTC77 views19 reactions2 Starsread 11 August 2026
Photo

Ну что, «Одиссея» - это не хороший фильм Нолана. Я думаю, это близко к лучшему. Ну и Нолан - лучший режиссёр в истории?

custom 53958058539221397848custom 53530100266906804576custom 53529317595016432013custom 53955714346071224251custom 53975791814941432581

Signed Кирилл Угаров

9 Aug 2026, 22:49 UTC87 views21 reactionsread 11 August 2026

Posted without readable text

custom 535301002669068045787custom 53529317595016432016

Signed 𝐦𝐮𝐫𝐚𝐤𝐚𝐦𝐢 ⊰⁠⊹ฺ

8 Aug 2026, 12:01 UTC81 views16 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

Четвертая фаза. Go 🧍‍♀️ Поезд киновселенной Marvel мчит вперед, и, кажется, самое время его нагнать. На самом деле я думаю, что сейчас лучшее время, чтобы оценить качество фильмов и сериалов четвертой фазы. Многие говорили мне, что не стоит, что Marvel превратился в голимый кал и местами так оно и есть, но давайте по порядку. Открывает фазу сериал ВандаВижн, и если кратко, он достаточно любопытный. Интересная задум

custom 53529317595016432016custom 53955714346071224255custom 53530100266906804574custom 53527973699749516271

Signed Владимир Гузик

7 Aug 2026, 11:10 UTC103 views20 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

в сегодняшней рекомендации у нас документальный фильм «Город кошек», который, я уверен, мало кто из вас видел. на Кинопоиске у фильма чуть больше десяти тысяч оценок. это кино про Стамбул, но не про туристический, а показанный глазами его главных обитателей — уличных кошек. по разной информации, на улицах Стамбула проживает от 100 тысяч до более чем 1 миллиона!!! уличных кошек. сначала я ждал обычной и банальной ис

custom 53529317595016432019custom 535301002669068045754custom 53957556887041197492

Signed Виктор

6 Aug 2026, 16:55 UTC95 views16 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

— Дашь списать домашку? — Да, только не списывай точь-в-точь, чтобы не спалили — Ок

custom 53958058539221397847custom 53527973699749516274custom 53978446791925118303custom 53955839973864647931custom 53975791814941432581

5 Aug 2026, 08:15 UTC113 views26 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

Многие сейчас пробуют выбирать фильмы для просмотра через ИИ, считая этот инструмент наилучшим для конкретной рекомендации и персонализации. Я решил проверить, так ли нейронки хороши, поэтому в чат с очень большим контекстом обо мне задал вопрос, какие фильмы мне стоит посмотреть. Назовем это новой рубрикой #нейрокино (звучит довольно крипово, предложите своё название😬). Что будет происходить? Я гляну 20 фильмов, по

13custom 53527973699749516277custom 53529317595016432015custom 53957556887041197491

Signed Кирилл Угаров

4 Aug 2026, 07:03 UTC106 views14 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

Перед просмотром новой экранизации приключений Одиссея решил взглянуть на сериальную версию Андрея Кончаловского. Я вам так скажу – время, к сожалению, берет своё! Мини-сериал ощущается таким тягучим, смешным на спецэффекты и старомодным, словно наткнулся на фотопленку из прошлого. Несмотря на все изъяны, сюжет Гомера, конечно, на века. Финальная треть произведения закрывает все вопросы о том, стоит ли смотреть, пото

custom 53529317595016432016custom 53527973699749516273custom 53978446791925118303custom 53530100266906804571custom 53955714346071224251

Signed Владимир Гузик

3 Aug 2026, 11:50 UTC121 views21 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

иронично было посмотреть «Шёпот сердца» после моего прошлого поста. до глубины души добрый, уютный и удивительно живой мультфильм о школьнице Сидзуку, которая однажды увидела имя Сейдзи на книгах, а после встречает мальчика на лавочке, что задевает ее. с этого момента начинается не столько история любви, сколько история о том, как два человека могут стать друг для друга причиной двигаться вперед. сценарий, кстати,

custom 53529317595016432019custom 53527973699749516274custom 539784467919251183032custom 53530100266906804572custom 53955714346071224251

Signed 𝐦𝐮𝐫𝐚𝐤𝐚𝐦𝐢 ⊰⁠⊹ฺ

Showing the 10 most recent of 10 posts we hold for @cheloveksmotrit. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“человек смотрящий” (@cheloveksmotrit), 528 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/cheloveksmotrit.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.