3 Dec 2022, 15:30 UTCviews —
Messages in this channel will no longer be automatically deleted
Channel
رویش
@ruyeesh
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
224subscribers
-2 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001350897488 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @ruyeesh |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 15 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/ruyeesh |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 15 Aug 2026, 15:33 | 224 | -1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 10:21 | 225 | -1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 03:02 | 226 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 18:49 | 226 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 8 October 2021 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 3 December 2022. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Recent posts
3 Dec 2022, 10:09 UTCviews —
Messages in this channel will be automatically deleted after 1 week
26 Aug 2022, 07:56 UTC≈1,490 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @naghdemotekalemin
6- امام لغوی أبو إسحاق الزجاج رحمهالله (310هـ) در کتاب «معاني القرآن» (ج۴ص۳۷۵) میفرمایند: «(وإنِّي لَأظُنُّهُ كاذِبًا) هذا قول فرعونَ، يقول: وإن كنت زعمت أني أطلِعُ إلى إله موسى، فأنا قلت هذا على دعوى موسى لا على أني على يقينٍ من ذلك» 7- شيخ الإسلام أبوعثمان صابوني رحمهالله (449هـ) در کتاب زیبايش «عقيدة السلف أصحاب الحديث» (ص۱۷۶) میفرمایند: «وأخبر الله سبحانه عن فرعون اللعين أنه قال لـهامان: ﴿ابْنِ لِي صَرْحًا ل…
26 Aug 2022, 07:56 UTC≈1,030 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @naghdemotekalemin
اهل تعطیل پیروان حقیقی مذهب فرعون ملعون! بدون تردید تمامی تعطیلکنندگان صفات الهی در مسیر انکار صفات الله عزوجل بر مذهب فرعون هستند، زیرا فرعون در زمرهی بزرگترین کسانی است که علو ذاتی الله عزوجل را تعطیل نمود، آنگاه که موسی علیهالسلام پروردگار خودش را بالای مخلوقات معرفی کرد، اما وی مستکبرانه و با تمسخر در پاسخ به موسی علیهالسلام گفت: ﴿وَقَالَ فِرۡعَوۡنُ یَـٰهَـٰمَـٰنُ ٱبۡنِ لِی صَرۡحࣰا لَّعَلِّیۤ أَبۡلُغُ ٱلۡأ…
28 Apr 2022, 16:24 UTC≈1,040 viewsread 7 August 2026
Video
Video, posted without a caption
28 Apr 2022, 14:49 UTC978 viewsread 7 August 2026
Video
Video, posted without a caption
27 Apr 2022, 12:08 UTC909 viewsread 7 August 2026
Video
Video, posted without a caption
23 Apr 2022, 04:42 UTC784 viewsread 7 August 2026
File
«شب قدر» جمعآوری مسائلی پیرامون شب قدر در ماه مبارک رمضان نویسنده: د.شـیخ صلاح الدین جوهری https://t.me/talifat_johari
22 Apr 2022, 10:36 UTC642 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @naghdemotekalemin
«پاسخ به اعتراض اهل تعطیل به حدیث مشهور جارية در کتاب صحيح مسلم با موضوع اثبات علو حقیقی الله متعال» یکی از هزاران دلیل صریح اهل سنت و جماعت برای اثبات بالا بودن حقیقی الله متعال بر تمامی مخلوقاتش حدیث معاویه بن الحکم السلمی رضیاللهعنه در «صحیح مسلم» میباشد که رسول الله صلیاللهعلیهوسلم از کنیزکی میپرسد: «الله کجاست؟» کنیزک پاسخ میدهد: «الله در آسمان است» سپس رسول الله صلیاللهعلیهوسلم خطاب به آقایش میفرما…
22 Apr 2022, 10:36 UTC810 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @naghdemotekalemin
شیخ سلیم بن عید هلالي وفقهالله در صفحهی (30-31) در بخش نتیجهگیری پس از بررسی اسانید روایت جاریه میفرمایند: اول: تمامی طریقهایی که در آنها پرسش: «أين الله؟» و «أين ربك؟» وجود ندارد ضعیف بوده و شایستهی استدلال نیستند؛ لذا درست نیست که در تعارض با حدیث صحیح و صریح جاریه با لفظ مذکور قرار گیرند. پس -الحمدلله- ثابت گشت که سوال «أين الله؟» لفظ رسول الله صلیاللهعلیهوسلم میباشد که صحیح بوده و دلالت دوپهلویی باقی …
14 Apr 2022, 15:20 UTC547 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @naghdemotekalemin
امام ترمذی رحمهالله (279هـ) در شرح بر حدیث اثبات صفت قدم برای الله متعال «وضَعَ الرَّحْمَنُ قَدَمَهُ فِيها» الجامع الکبیر (ج۴ص۲۷۳) میفرمایند: «وقَدْ رُوِيَ عَنِ النَّبِيِّ ﷺ رِواياتٌ كَثِيرَةٌ مِثْلُ هَذا ما يُذْكَرُ فِيهِ أمْرُ الرُّؤْيَةِ أنَّ النّاسَ يَرَوْنَ رَبَّهُمْ وذِكْرُ القَدَمِ وما أشْبَهَ هَذِهِ الأشْياءَ. والمَذْهَبُ فِي هَذا عِنْدَ أهْلِ العِلْمِ مِنَ الأئِمَّةِ مِثْلِ سُفْيانَ الثَّوْرِيِّ، ومالِكِ …
14 Apr 2022, 15:20 UTC635 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @naghdemotekalemin
منهج امام جلیلالقدر أبو عُبَيْدٍ القاسِمَ بْنَ سَلّام (224هـ) رحمهالله در اثبات صفاتی مانند «قدم»، «ضحک» و... امام دارقطنی رحمهالله (385هـ) روایت میکنند: «حدَّثنا مُحَمَّدُ بْنُ مَخْلَدٍ، ثنا العَبّاسُ بْنُ مُحَمَّدٍ الدُّورِيُّ قالَ: سَمِعْتُ أبا عُبَيْدٍ القاسِمَ بْنَ سَلّامٍ، وذَكَرَ البابَ الَّذِي يروى في 👈الرُّؤْيَةَ👉 والكُرْسِيَّ ومَوْضِعَ القَدَمَيْنِ، وضَحِكِ رَبِّنا مِن قُنُوطِ عِبادِهِ، وقُرْبِ غِيَرِه…
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @ruyeesh. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 861,481 of 1,548,671entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 3
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 0
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 3
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@ruyeesh named 3 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
@rahrowane_nobowwat
named in 22 posts, 8 August 2026 – 9 August 2026
named in 22 posts, 8 August 2026 – 9 August 2026
@efshay_motekallemin
named in 2 posts, 8 August 2026 – 9 August 2026
named in 2 posts, 8 August 2026 – 9 August 2026
@salehsendi
named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“رویش” (@ruyeesh), 224 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ruyeesh.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.