Channel
@naghdemotekalemin
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
139subscribers
+1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001357074825 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @naghdemotekalemin |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 11 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 2 times, most recently 11 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/naghdemotekalemin |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 3 Sept 2026, 11:41 | 139 | +2 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 18:46 | 137 | -1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 22:46 | 138 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 03:02 | 138 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 6 June 2022 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 16 September 2022. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
امام عثمان بن سعید رحمهالله در پاسخ به جهمیه که ادعا دارند اسماء الحسنی و قرآن مخلوق هستند چنین فرمودهاند: «إنَّ الرقعة و كتابة الِاسم ليس كنفس الِاسم. إذا احترقت الرُّقْعَةُ احْتَرقَ الخطُّ وبقي اسْمُ اللَّه لَه وعلى لسان الكاتب كما لم يَزَلْ قَبْلَ أنْ يُكْتَبَ، لَمْ تُنْقِصِ النّارُ مِنَ الِاسْمِ ولا مِمَّنْ لَهُ الِاسْمُ شَيْئًا. وكَذَلِكَ لَوْ كانَتْ أسْماءَ المَخْلُوقِينَ، لَمْ تُنْقِصِ النّارُ مِن أسْمائِهِ…
موقف امام عثمان بن سعید دارمی پیرامون الفاظی که متکلمان به کثرت پیرامون آن سخن میگویند: «وأمّا قَوْلُ: مَن زَعَمَ أنَّهُ خَرَجَ مِن جِسْمٍ فَهُوَ كافِرٌ، فَلَيْسَ يُقالُ كَذَلِكَ، ولا أراكَ سَمِعْتَ أحَدًا يَتَفَوَّهُ بِهِ كَما ادَّعَيْتَ، غَيْرَ أنّا لا نَشُكُّ أنَّهُ خَرَجَ مِنَ اللَّهِ تَبارَكَ وتَعالى دُونَ مَن سِواهُ. وذِكْرُ الجِسْمِ والفَمِ واللِّسانِ خُرافاتٌ٤ وفُضُولٌ مَرْفُوعَةٌ عَنّا، لَمْ نُكَلَّفْهُ فِي…
Channel name was changed to «کانال || نقد متکلمین»
شیخ الاسلام ابنتیمیه رحمهالله میفرمایند: «وأيْضًا لا تَجِدُ أحَدًا مِن أهْلِ الأرْضِ حَقَّقَ عِلْمًا مِن العُلُومِ وصارَ إمامًا فِيهِ مُسْتَعِينًا بِصِناعَةِ المَنطِقِ لا مِن العُلُومِ الدِّينِيَّةِ ولا غَيْرِها فالأطِبّاءُ والحساب والكُتّابُ ونَحْوُهُمْ يُحَقِّقُونَ ما يُحَقِّقُونَ مِن عُلُومِهِمْ وصِناعاتِهِمْ بِغَيْرِ صِناعَةِ المَنطِقِ. وقَدْ صُنِّفَ فِي الإسْلامِ عُلُومُ النَّحْوِ واللُّغَةِ والعَرُوضِ والفِق…
چگونه باید صفات الله متعال را بشناسی؟ تالیف: علامه محمد امین شنقیطی تهیه و تنظیم: نقد متکلمین تعداد صفحات: 8 @naghdemotekalemin
7- شيخ الإسلام أبوعثمان صابوني رحمهالله (449هـ) در کتاب زیبايش «عقيدة السلف أصحاب الحديث» (ص۱۷۶) میفرمایند: «وأخبر الله سبحانه عن فرعون اللعين أنه قال لـهامان: ﴿ابْنِ لِي صَرْحًا لَعَلِّي أبْلُغُ الأسْبابَ أسْبابَ السَّمَواتِ فَأطَّلِعَ إلى إلَهِ مُوسى وإنِّي لَأظُنُّهُ كاذِبًا﴾ [غافر:٣٦-٣٧] وإنما قال ذلك لأنه سمع موسى علیهالسلام يذكر أن ربه في السماء، ألا ترى إلى قوله: ﴿وإنِّي لَأظُنُّهُ كاذِبًا﴾ [غافر:٣٧]، يعني:…
اهل تعطیل پیروان حقیقی مذهب فرعون ملعون! بدون تردید تمامی تعطیلکنندگان صفات الهی در مسیر انکار صفات الله عزوجل بر مذهب فرعون هستند، زیرا فرعون در زمرهی بزرگترین کسانی است که علو ذاتی الله عزوجل را تعطیل نمود، آنگاه که موسی علیهالسلام پروردگار خودش را بالای مخلوقات معرفی کرد، اما وی مستکبرانه و با تمسخر در پاسخ به موسی علیهالسلام گفت: ﴿وَقَالَ فِرۡعَوۡنُ یَـٰهَـٰمَـٰنُ ٱبۡنِ لِی صَرۡحࣰا لَّعَلِّیۤ أَبۡلُغُ ٱلۡأ…
اهل تعطیل سه مرتبه در تشبیه واقع شدند! «د.شیخ صالح سندی وفقهالله» @rahrowane_nobowwat
✨ اخـــلاق علمـــاء ... در #طبقات_الشافعية آمده که #ربیع_بن_سلیمان -رحمهالله- در فهم مسائل کُند بود، روزی #امام_شافعی -رحمهالله- مسألهای را چهل بار برایش توضیح داد اما او باز هم آن را فهم نکرد، لذا از روی شرم و حیاء از مجلس خارج شد. ▪︎امام شافعی وی را صدا زده و باز هم برایش توضیح داد تا اینکه آن مسأله را فهم نمود. سپس گفت: «ای ربيع! اگر میتوانستم علم را -مانند غذا- به تو بخورانم، آن را به تو میخوراندم!» 📚|…
🔹️وصیّت شیخ عبدالعزیز ابن باز -رحمهالله- #کلیپ #شیخ_عبدالعزیز_بن_باز #وصیت ••✦⚜🔹️🌿💠🌿🔹️⚜✦•• @rahrowane_nobowwat
سبب منع امام احمد از استعمال لفظ «محدَث»: از آنجا که جهمیان عقیده داشتند که قرآن «محدَث» به معنای مخلوق است، امام احمد چنین معنای از محدث را کفر میدانست، اما نهی ایشان از لفظ «محدث» بهطور کلی از جهت سد ذریعه بوده است؛ چنانکه امام ابن کثیر -رحمه الله- پیرامون محنت امام احمد -رحمه الله- فرموده است: در این سال، مأمون به نائب خود اسحاق بن ابراهیم در بغداد نوشت و به او دستور داد تا قضات و محدثین را با قول خلق به قرآن …
آیا گفتن قرآن کلام الله و محدَث است اشکال دارد؟ در ابتدا بهتر است که برخی از مقدمات در اینجا ذکر شود: مقدمهی اول: کلام الله «قدیم النوع، و حادث الآحاد» است؛ یعنی صفت کلام به اعتبار نوع صفت ذاتی است، اما به اعتبار آحاد صفت کلام صفت فعلی است که متعلق به مشیئت و قدرت الهی است و هر وقت بخواهد و هرگونه اراده کند سخن میگوید. مقدمهی دوم: لفظ «محدَث» مجمل و محتمل است و این لفظ در کلام علما به دو اعتبار ذکر شده است: 1: …
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @naghdemotekalemin. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@naghdemotekalemin named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 3 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“کانال || نقد متکلمین” (@naghdemotekalemin), 139 subscribers as measured 3 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/naghdemotekalemin.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.