Channel
@rosentalfriendly
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
85subscribers
-1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001035194991 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @rosentalfriendly |
| Created | 30 March 2016 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 15 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/rosentalfriendly |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 15 Aug 2026, 15:04 | 85 | -1 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 16:46 | 86 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 18:01 | 86 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 31 March 2022 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 22 January 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
4 reactions across 1 post, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🙏 | 4 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 1 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 4reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 31 March 2022 to 22 January 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Чем нам грозит отказ от письма на бумаге? На The Guardian — лонгридище о том, как на нас влияет отказ от ручного письма. Если старшее поколение еще записывает что-то в блокнот, то зумеры разочарованно вздыхают, когда их просят писать от руки. «Прописью? Большинство моих сверстников сталкивались с этим “иностранным языком” только в письмах от бабули», — говорит один из опрошенных американских старшеклассников. По одн…
#лингвистика #философия Время идет, уходит, проходит, бежит, замедляется, протекает, летит, мчится — короче говоря, движется. Будущее ждет нас впереди, а прошедшее оказалось позади, ушло бесследно или наоборот оставило след на жизненном пути. Одно событие пред-шествует другому, один день идет за другим, год следует за годом, событие имеет начало и подходит к концу, дело может зайти слишком далеко и вообще бывает так,…
Про имя самого ненавистного персонажа Гарри Поттера: - Долорес Джейн Амбридж Dolores Jane Umbridge Или - Скорбляна Банальновна Обиженова Это далеко лучшее ФИО в Гарри Поттере. В нем куча информации и сообщений, идеально совпадающих с архетипом этого ужасного и великого персонажа. Начать с фамилии Umbridge. Выглядит она как обычная фамилия, но созвучна с одним из моих самых любимых слов “Umbrage”. Этимология: сре…
Знаете слово «фордыбачить»?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Русский Past Perfect: я было пошел ☁️ В русском языке на самом деле было гораздо больше типов прошедшего времени, чем сегодня. Были аорист, перфект, имперфект и плюсквамперфект. ☁️Они у нас умерли в веке XI-XII, а осталось только лишь причастие, оканчивающееся на "л" от смыслового глагола. ➡️Давайте включим попробуем перевести с современного на древнерусский: 🟢 Я купихъ — я купил что-то. Здесь мы использовали ао…
🙏4
Править бал, а не балом
Пертурбация [немецкое Perturbation < латинское perturbatio «расстройство, смятение»] – 1) изменение пути небесного тела под воздействием силы притяжения других тел (в астрономии); 2) перен. внезапное, резкое нарушение нормального хода чего-либо, вызывающее замешательство, смятение.
КуркУма — ударение на «у» (переучиваюсь)
Откуда-то пошла мода писать слова с приставкой «со-» черед дефис. Возможно, путают с английским с его co-author. Это ошибка. Сооснователь, соавтор, собрат, собутыльник. Cheers 🥂
Редко тут появляюсь, но не могу не поделиться: кофешенк — должность смотрителя за приготовлением чая, кофе или шоколада при царском или помещичьем дворе
Пока мы готовили для вас новый большой переводческий эпизод (который, hopefully, окажется в канун декабрьского Рождества под ёлкой), в нашу сеть угодила настоящая жемчужина, выловленная в водах YouTube'а. Это восхитительное видео переводчика Дмитрия Ермоловича, в котором автор дерзновенно покушается на святое – книгу "Слово живое и мертвое" Норы Галь. Ермолович анализирует текст, который называют иногда "Библией ред…
Ещё не смотрела, но не могу не поделиться!
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @rosentalfriendly. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Знаете слово «фордыбачить»?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 31 March 2022 to 22 January 2025. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@rosentalfriendly named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Во имя Розенталя” (@rosentalfriendly), 85 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/rosentalfriendly.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.