Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 레드우드 인사이트 Believe in the Future

Channel

레드우드 인사이트 Believe in the Future

@redwoodinvestor

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

470subscribers

-15 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001175225615
TypeChannel
Username@redwoodinvestor
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live17 September 2026
Measurements held7
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 17 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/redwoodinvestor

Topic

Technology — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 21 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

470485477.57 August 2026 — 485 subscribers8 August 2026 — 485 subscribers16 August 2026 — 479 subscribers25 August 2026 — 474 subscribers31 August 2026 — 473 subscribers10 September 2026 — 471 subscribers17 September 2026 — 470 subscribers7 August 202617 September 2026
7 measurements spanning 41 days, net -15. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 468–487 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
17 Sept 2026, 17:37470-1
10 Sept 2026, 09:56471-2
31 Aug 2026, 04:25473-1
25 Aug 2026, 03:13474-5
16 Aug 2026, 18:48479-6
8 Aug 2026, 04:32485no change
7 Aug 2026, 13:31485first reading

Engagement

18 posts held, back to 9 December 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 27 April 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

2 reactions across 1 post, in 1 kind.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤2100.0%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 1 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 9 December 2025 to 27 April 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

27 Apr 2026, 06:12 UTC167 viewsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @HANAchina

>>중지쉬촹 “800G·1.6T 제품, 실리콘 포토닉스 비중 과반…양 기술 모두 지속 투자” •광모듈 대장주 중지쉬촹은 인터랙티브 플랫폼을 통해 현재 800G 및 1.6T 제품에서 실리콘 포토닉스 솔루션 비중이 절반을 초과, 향후 해당 비중이 지속적으로 확대될 것으로 전망된다고 밝힘. 다만 실리콘 포토닉스와 EML 솔루션 모두 중요한 기술 방향으로, 회사는 두 분야 모두에 지속적으로 투자할 계획임. 또한 현재 CPU 분야에는 별도의 사업 전개가 없다고 설명 >中际旭创在互动平台表示,目前800G和1.6T产品硅光方案占比超过一半,硅光方案的比重有望持续提升;但硅光方案和EML方案都是重要技术方向,公司未来都会持续布局。另外,中际旭创表示,公司目前在CPU领域暂无布局。 (来自华尔街见闻)

25 Mar 2026, 07:06 UTC153 viewsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @BRILLER_ResearchPhoto

[ECM 기업들 최근 4분기 실적과 밸류 테이블] by BRILLER(t.me/BRILLER_Research) 장중기준이라 저는 수기로 작성을 해서 시총, P/E, 출시 일 이후 누적 상승률은 실시간이 아니라 약간의 차이가 날 수 있습니다. 하기의 4기업 다 기존에 본업이 있는 상황에서 ECM 사업을 추가하였고 밸류가 싼기업 순서로 나열할까 하다가 심플하게 시총이 큰 기업부터 순서대로 나열 하였습니다. 2025년 발표 실적 기준 [엘앤씨바이오] 제품명 : 엘라비에 리투오(24년 11월 18일 출시) ECM 제품 공식 출시 일 이후 누적 주가 상승률 = 419%🔥 매출액 : 855억, 영익 : 44억, 순익 : -1,376억 ⭕️ 시가총액 : 18,238억 ⭕️ 25 P/E = -13.25 [한스바이오메드] 제품명 : 셀르디엠(25년 …

4 Feb 2026, 12:41 UTC201 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo

[에이피알(278470)/TP 350,000원(상향)/매수(유지)/ 미래에셋 컨슈머 배송이] ★ 더 사도 되는 구간 ▶ 4Q25 Review: 주요 지역, 채널 전반 또 폭풍 성장 - 에이피알의 4Q25 실적은 매출액 5,476억원(YoY +124%), 영업이익 1,301억원(YoY +228%)으로 시장 기대치를 상회 - 주요 지역(미국, 일본, B2B), 주요 채널(온오프라인) 모두 강한 모멘텀 재확인 - 미국 온라인 200% 이상 성장, 오프라인 160억원 - 일본 온라인 200% 이상 성장, 오프라인 QoQ 성장 ▶ 2026년 가이던스 매출액 2.1조원, OPM 25% 제시 - 가이던스 보수적. 1분기 현재 4분기 최성수기 대비 영업상황 크게 다르지 않음 - 1분기 5천억원 내외 매출 추정하는 바, 하반기 계절성 감안해 연간 2.1…

6 Jan 2026, 03:28 UTC190 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @bornlupin

NVIDIA 루빈 플랫폼, 오픈 모델, 자율주행: NVIDIA, CES에서 미래를 향한 청사진 제시 NVIDIA 창업자 겸 CEO 젠슨 황은 CES 라스베이거스 기조연설에서, NVIDIA 최초의 ‘익스트림 코드사인(extreme-codesigned)’ AI 플랫폼인 루빈(Rubin), 헬스케어·로보틱스·자율주행을 위한 오픈 모델, 그리고 AI로 정의되는 주행을 선보이는 메르세데스-벤츠 CLA를 공개했다. NVIDIA 창업자 겸 CEO 젠슨 황은 오늘 라스베이거스 폰텐블로(Fontainebleau)에서 CES 2026 개막 기조연설 무대에 올라, AI가 모든 도메인과 모든 디바이스로 확장되고 있다고 선언했다. “가속 컴퓨팅과 인공지능으로 인해 컴퓨팅은 근본적으로 재편되었습니다. 이는 지난 10년간 약 10조 달러 규모의 컴퓨팅이 이제 …

❤2

6 Jan 2026, 03:27 UTC141 viewsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @joonsungkim

📮[메리츠증권 모빌리티 김준성] 안녕하세요, 메리츠증권 김준성입니다. 휴머노이드 로봇을 전면에 내세운 현대차그룹 CES 미디어데이 업데이트 드립니다. 먼저 현대차그룹 미디어데이 주요 발표 내용입니다. 1. 휴머노이드 로봇 (범용 노동 대체 로봇) Atlas, 프로토타입이 아닌 대량 양산 버전 공개 2. Atlas의 제조 현장 투입 위한 대규모 데이터 학습 시설인 Hyundai Robotics Meta Plant Application Center (RMAC) 구축, 이는 물리 AI 개발 위한 Data Factory 3. 연간 30,000개의 Atlas 양산 거점 또한 동시 구축 예정 4. 2026년 8월 Atlas 학습 설비인 RMAC 가동 시작, 2028년 현대차그룹 계열사들의 SDF (Software Defined Factory)…

Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @redwoodinvestor. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“레드우드 인사이트 Believe in the Future” (@redwoodinvestor), 470 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/redwoodinvestor.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.