Channel
@redhorsemedia
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
23subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002411309409 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @redhorsemedia |
| Description | У него один недостаток, Киса — он слишком хорош Родом из t.me/osbornozzymafiozzi |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 11 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/redhorsemedia |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Aug 2026, 11:47 | 23 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 16:34 | 23 | first reading |
18 posts held, back to 26 June 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 20 March 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
65 reactions across 11 posts, in 20 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 16.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 💯 | 11 | 16.9% | |
| ❤ | 7 | 10.8% | |
| 👍 | 7 | 10.8% | |
| 👀 | 5 | 7.69% | |
| 👏 | 4 | 6.15% | |
| 🔥 | 4 | 6.15% | |
| 🤬 | 4 | 6.15% | |
| 🤣 | 3 | 4.62% | |
| 🤮 | 3 | 4.62% | |
| 👎 | 2 | 3.08% | |
| 💔 | 2 | 3.08% | |
| 💩 | 2 | 3.08% | |
| 😁 | 2 | 3.08% | |
| 😱 | 2 | 3.08% | |
| 🙈 | 2 | 3.08% | |
| ✍ | 1 | 1.54% | |
| 🖕 | 1 | 1.54% | |
| 🗿 | 1 | 1.54% | |
| 🤡 | 1 | 1.54% | |
| 🥰 | 1 | 1.54% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 65reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 26 June 2025 to 20 March 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Кисы, читаю книжку про инцелов. И у меня для вас плохие новости: это не про «не дают». Это про «я никому не нужен — значит, мир сломан». Инцел — это когда одиночество превращают в идеологию. Типа: есть «Чады», есть «Стейси», а ты — статистическая ошибка без шансов. Это у них называется «чёрная таблетка». Проглотил — и всё, можно не развиваться, а ненавидеть. Теперь больно всем. Мужики: если вы решили, что вам «дол…
👀2😁2😱2
Любовь?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Ред флаг в отношениях выглядит так.
🤮2💩1🥰1
🧠 Интересно, что в этом списке — не просто «красные флаги», а отражение базовых эмоциональных потребностей. ⠀ 👵 Женщины чувствуют угрозу там, где нет эмоциональной безопасности: давление, неуважение к границам, равнодушие к чувствам. 👨🦳 Мужчины — там, где рушится их самооценка и ощущение смысла: когда их обесценивают, не признают их вклад, не видят человека за ролью. ⠀ В итоге обе стороны хотят одного и того же — б…
👍2💔2💯2
Нужен ли женщине мужчина для материнства?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
А вы, что думаете, кисы? 👇
Кисы, ну что я вам скажу… Когда каждая третья из вас говорит, что штамп в паспорте — не условие для детства и материнства, я понимаю: жизнь меняется быстрее, чем я запоминаю ваши имена. И это, кстати, нормально. Феминистическая позиция тут ясна: женщина хочет сама решать, когда рожать, с кем рожать и нужно ли ей при этом узаконивать отношения. Свобода выбора — это и есть взрослая жизнь. Если доход есть, самостояте…
❤2
🎬 Кино про то, как киса начинает платить сама (и что с мужиком потом бывает)^ 1. «Крамер против Крамера» (1979) Она ушла, зарабатывала, вернулась — а он уже научился без неё жить. Сильная киса стала независимой, но столкнулась с тем, что мужик перестал быть нужным в роли банкомата. Итог — суд, драма, нерв. 2. «Секс в большом городе» (2008) Миранда и Стив обсуждают, кто сколько вносит. Киса решила: «Я сама», а у муж…
👍1
Когда в паре женщина начинает платить наравне с мужчиной, то в её голове могут начаться два кино одновременно: 🎬 Первое — «Я взрослая, я самостоятельная, я вкладываюсь». 🎬 Второе — «А что, он теперь не тянет? Он слабее? Я его содержу?». И тут неважно, насколько ты прогрессивная, эмансипированная или любишь "50/50" в кафе. Если мужчина был для тебя в роли опоры, то переход на «пополам» может тихо подтачивать уважени…
👀3👍2💯2👎1👏1🖕1🤡1
В Москве девушка обменяла свою СОБАКУ на сумку Birkin за 2 миллиона рублей. К ней подошла владелица Birkin и предложила сделку: «Отдаю сумку, если отдашь собаку». И вот, пёс «Тедди» пошёл к новой хозяйке, а девушка вернулась домой с дорогущей сумкой. Да, звучит жёстко. Но мир странный. И люди иногда делают странный выбор. Возможно, ей правда казалось, что сумка важнее. А может, у неё не было сил заботиться о псе, а…
❤5🤣3🙈2
💥 Совместный бизнес с любимыми: кайф или яд? ❤️ Когда это кайф Есть такие романтики, которые мечтают: «Как же круто, если мы с ней (или с ним) будем делать одно дело, бизнес, проекты, будем вместе и в работе, и в жизни». И знаешь, что? Это реально бывает круто. Когда вы вдвоём тащите одно дело: 🔹 У вас общий взгляд, 🔹 Один жар, 🔹 Общие победы. Вы заряжаете друг друга, поддерживаете, знаете, как она/он дышит, …
💯3🔥2✍1💩1
🧭 Ну что, читайте мнение Стельки. Мне нравится, как она всё это разложила по полочкам — иронично, но по сути. ✅ Идея защитить детей от блогерской фабрики — нужная. ❌ Но пиар на этой теме от тех, кто сам недавно пел «За деньги да» — звучит как минимум забавно. Обожаю эти превращения: «я всё купила, теперь запрещу». В этом мы все немножко Мизулина, да? 🤷♂️ Короче, пусть обсуждают. А мы тут обсудим тоже — без лицеме…
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @redhorsemedia. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Любовь?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Нужен ли женщине мужчина для материнства?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 26 June 2025 to 20 March 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank — 880,152 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@redhorsemedia named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Редфлаг” (@redhorsemedia), 23 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/redhorsemedia.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.