Channel
@recruitmasterapp
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
87subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003536881506 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @recruitmasterapp |
| Created | Between 1 December 2025 and 31 May 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 13 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/recruitmasterapp |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug 2026, 16:28 | 87 | +1 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 16:17 | 86 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 15:37 | 86 | -1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 15:52 | 87 | first reading |
19 posts held, back to 14 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 19 (14 July 2026 – 7 August 2026) |
| Views total | 872 |
| Reactions total | 99 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 9 Aug 2026, 16:17 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
101 reactions across 16 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 38.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 39 | 38.6% | |
| ❤ | 31 | 30.7% | |
| 👍 | 25 | 24.8% | |
| 😱 | 3 | 2.97% | |
| 👏 | 1 | 0.99% | |
| 😁 | 1 | 0.99% | |
| 🙉 | 1 | 0.99% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 101reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 14 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Новости из мира найма С пятницей! Желаю классно провести выходные, а пока ловите подборку свежей статистики и трендов из мира рекрутмента и найма и куда вообще движется наш рынок прямо сейчас: Сроки растут: среднее время закрытия вакансии почти удвоилось. Если в 2023 году на это уходило около 36–44 дней, то к январю 2026 года показатель вырос до 63–68 дней. Собеседования затягиваются, а конкуренция за людей жесткая…
👍4❤2🙉1
Денис Кечкин | Найм без хаоса pinned «RecruitMaster для всех, кто участвует в процессах найма Почему даже сильные HR-команды часто не могут закрывать вакансии вовремя? Потому что рекрутинг редко работает как единый процесс. HR обвиняет бизнес, бизнес - HR, а собственник остается судьей. Именно…»
RecruitMaster для всех, кто участвует в процессах найма Почему даже сильные HR-команды часто не могут закрывать вакансии вовремя? Потому что рекрутинг редко работает как единый процесс. HR обвиняет бизнес, бизнес - HR, а собственник остается судьей. Именно эту проблему мы и решили в RecruitMaster. Хочу рассказать подробнее о своем продукте, для кого он предназначен и какие задачи помогает решить. Ключевая идея мо…
🔥3❤1
"Ваши рекрутеры вообще ничего не умеют, мы сами все закрываем" Хуже этой фразы нет ничего: на планерке вам «прилетает» за сорванные дедлайны. Все винят HR-отдел, потому что людей в смене нет, а вы узнаете о проблеме последним, когда тушить пожар уже поздно. Сценарий всегда один: подбор идет, рекрутеры рапортуют «все в работе», но никто не учитывает реальный лаг. Новичку еще нужно пройти стажировку, которую никто не…
🔥4❤3👍2
Денис Кечкин | Найм без хаоса pinned a photo
Я нанял mobile-девелопера за 2000$ в месяц на парт-тайм и не потратил ни рубля на hh. Все благодаря Threads. Вышел на программистку, которая сейчас дорабатывает мое мобильное приложение. Причем она сама нашла мой Telegram, написала первой, показала свои работы и была действительно заинтересована в проекте. На hh я гораздо реже встречаю такой уровень инициативы и мотивации у кандидатов. У них теперь новый конкурент. …
🔥4❤2
Кстати, именно поэтому в RecruitMaster мы делаем ставку не только на резюме, но и на коллективную экспертизу рекрутеров. В системе специалисты могут оставлять комментарии, рекомендации и заметки по кандидатам, а другие рекрутеры видят эту информацию при работе с анкетой. В результате оценка строится не только на том, что кандидат написал о себе, но и на реальном опыте взаимодействия с ним со стороны профессионально…
🔥4❤3
Кандидаты врут Прочитал тут исследование от портала theHRD.ru про «фрод» (мошенничество и накрутки) в найме. Цифры и факты впечатляют. Самые сочные факты из статьи: 1. Масштаб проблемы — почти 90% 88,7% рекрутеров и HRD за последний год сталкивались с обманом или искажениями в резюме. Причем 35% говорят, что видят такие «фантазии» регулярно. 2. Топ-3 популярных обмана: Накрутка опыта и лет работы - 77% Искажение …
❤4👍3
Денис Кечкин | Найм без хаоса pinned a photo
Posted without readable text
🔥4
Чек-лист для рекрутеров: где искать кандидатов? 🔎 Ловите небольшую подборку Telegram-каналов и чатов, где можно найти специалистов под разные задачи: 1) Рекомендации резюме | Майя Литвина проверила 🤌 2) Резюме и рекомендации на кандидатов 3) IT Recruiter 4) Hrdigital 5) HR/Recruitment 6) RecruitMaster Не могу не рассказать о своем продукте :) Здесь собрана база резюме, которыми делятся другие рекрутеры. Благодаря …
👍4
Рекрутеры, разыгрываю 30$. Первые 10 победителей получат приз. Вы знаете, как я люблю устраивать розыгрыши. И периодически здесь на канале буду их проводить. Поэтому не пропускайте посты, если хотите выиграть денежный приз :) Итак, условия конкурса следующие: 1) добавить вакансию в RecruitMaster 2) добавить 30 кандидатов к вакансии из hh.ru (резюме обязательно добавлять с этой платформы и через парсер) 3) заполнить…
👍4❤3🔥3😁1
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @recruitmasterapp. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 550,074 of 1,189,255entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Денис Кечкин | Найм без хаоса” (@recruitmasterapp), 87 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/recruitmasterapp.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.