Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

EVAA

@evaatg

Verified by Telegram2 usernames

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

17,654subscribers

-114 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002281490222
TypeChannel
Usernames@evaafi @evaatg
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held16
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/evaatg

Growth

17,65417,76817,7116 August 2026 — 17,768 subscribers6 August 2026 — 17,768 subscribers7 August 2026 — 17,757 subscribers7 August 2026 — 17,731 subscribers7 August 2026 — 17,731 subscribers7 August 2026 — 17,731 subscribers8 August 2026 — 17,720 subscribers8 August 2026 — 17,720 subscribers9 August 2026 — 17,712 subscribers10 August 2026 — 17,713 subscribers11 August 2026 — 17,699 subscribers11 August 2026 — 17,699 subscribers11 August 2026 — 17,681 subscribers12 August 2026 — 17,681 subscribers13 August 2026 — 17,654 subscribers13 August 2026 — 17,654 subscribers6 August 202613 August 2026
16 measurements spanning 7 days, net -114. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 17,637–17,785 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 05:1617,654no change
13 Aug 2026, 01:2717,654-27
12 Aug 2026, 02:5717,681no change
11 Aug 2026, 23:4217,681-18
11 Aug 2026, 00:4217,699no change
11 Aug 2026, 00:0617,699-14
10 Aug 2026, 00:0117,713+1
9 Aug 2026, 23:4117,712-8
8 Aug 2026, 23:5117,720no change
8 Aug 2026, 23:3017,720-11
7 Aug 2026, 23:2317,731no change
7 Aug 2026, 21:1517,731no change
7 Aug 2026, 21:0417,731-26
7 Aug 2026, 00:2017,757-11
6 Aug 2026, 02:1717,768no change
6 Aug 2026, 00:4817,768first reading

Engagement

23 posts held, back to 29 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 18 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
12.5%
avg views ÷ 17,654 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,210
13 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.59%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
13
of 23 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 August 2026
Posts held23 (29 June 202611 August 2026)
Views total28,717
Reactions total456
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken13 Aug 2026, 00:28 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

862 reactions across 23 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 49.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥42449.2%
25129.1%
12915.0%
🎉586.73%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 23 of the 23 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 862reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 23 most recent posts we hold, published 29 June 2026 to 11 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

11 Aug 2026, 12:05 UTC797 views30 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

Weekly Best APY on EVAA 😇 This week, 🤑USDT leads the EVAA LP Pool with a 16.5%+ Supply APY. Supply USDT to the LP Pool and earn based on current market demand. ℹ️ Rates are dynamic and can change as liquidity conditions shift. ➡️Open the LP Pool and see where the yield is now App | Support | X | Guides | Ref | SDK

🔥1287🎉3

10 Aug 2026, 16:07 UTC≈1,000 views33 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

The security behind every EVAA position 🛡 Before yield, borrowing power or any strategy comes one thing: the infrastructure behind the position. EVAA approaches security on several levels. 🔭 Audited smart contracts EVAA’s core contracts have been reviewed by Trail of Bits and Quantstamp, bringing independent security expertise into the protocol. 👀 Open and verifiable code Core smart contracts are publicly availabl

🔥1995

7 Aug 2026, 13:47 UTC≈1,680 views38 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

Why We Built the Bridge Inside EVAA 🤔 😭Your liquidity doesn’t always start on TON. Sometimes the assets you want to use in EVAA are sitting on another network. Instead of leaving the app, searching for a separate bridge, moving the funds, and coming back, you can do it directly through EVAA Bridge. 💱 Bring supported assets into TON or send them back across 30+ networks — without breaking your flow. ⮕ EVAA Bridge

🔥2387

4 Aug 2026, 15:50 UTC≈1,980 views28 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

More utility for $EVAA on Bitget 💱 😇Hold $EVAA on Bitget and earn rewards through Simple Earn, currently offering 1% APR. 🔍Open the Simple Earn page, search for EVAA, choose the amount you want to subscribe, and start earning. 🔗Current rates and product terms are available on the platform: https://www.bitget.com/finance/savings?source1=earn&source2=savings App | Support | X | Guides | Ref | SDK

🔥186🎉4

3 Aug 2026, 13:28 UTC≈2,060 views27 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

Liquidity without leaving your staking position 🏦 🏦 Stake GRAM through Tonstakers and receive tsTON — a liquid staking token that represents your position and accumulated staking rewards. 😇 When you need liquidity, there is no need to unstake first. Supply tsTON to EVAA as collateral and borrow another asset against it. 🎉 Your staking position remains active while the same capital gains a new function across DeFi.

🔥1494

31 Jul 2026, 13:38 UTC≈2,390 views25 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

Your Capital Doesn’t Take Weekends Off 🚶‍♀️ Friday night. You close the charts, put the phone away, and move on with your weekend. ↗️ Assets supplied to EVAA remain part of an active lending market, earning according to current pool demand while liquidity continues moving between users. 🙈 Log off, your position stays active! App | Support | X | Guides | Ref | SDK

🔥1294

29 Jul 2026, 14:37 UTC≈2,470 views31 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

Access liquidity without closing the position 🫴 🔑 Selling gives you liquidity by closing your position. Borrowing lets you access liquidity while keeping the original asset as part of it. 😇 On EVAA, supplied assets can be used as collateral to borrow another asset — for a new opportunity, a different strategy, or simply more flexibility on-chain. 😉 Keep the asset, unlock the liquidity and choose what comes next ➡️

🔥17104

27 Jul 2026, 13:29 UTC≈2,520 views44 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

Every position on EVAA starts with a price 💵 Every borrow and withdrawal on EVAA depends on accurate asset prices. That is why EVAA does not rely on a single data source. 🔮The oracle system collects data from Pyth Network, RedStone and Stork. For assets such as tsTON, it can also use relevant on-chain contract data. Before using the data, EVAA smart contracts verify multiple fresh packages, their signatures, and t

🔥221111

25 Jul 2026, 15:51 UTC≈2,540 views37 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

Borrow More GRAM Against Your tsTON 🏦 Supply tsTON as collateral and borrow GRAM. Since both assets belong to the same correlated group, E-Mode can give the position a higher borrowing limit than Normal Mode. ⚡️ There is nothing to enable manually. EVAA applies E-Mode automatically when the position meets the conditions. ⚡️Same tsTON collateral. Higher GRAM borrowing limit. Learn how E-Mode works: 📕 EVAA GitBook

15🔥157

22 Jul 2026, 10:42 UTC≈2,870 views55 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

The distance between Telegram and DeFi is getting shorter 🔔 🚀 Telegram plans to make a native non-custodial wallet accessible to its roughly 1 billion users this summer. 👛 Wallet in Telegram already has more than 150 million registered users and includes non-custodial TON wallet. So the important part of this announcement is not the existence of a wallet, but the scale Telegram is aiming for. 📈 Expanding self-cust

🔥251614

20 Jul 2026, 12:39 UTC≈2,650 views35 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

What are your assets doing right now? 👩‍💻 Your calendar is full and schedule is packed. But what about your assets? If they're simply sitting in a wallet, they're not participating in the DeFi market. ⚡️Putting capital to work and start earning yield takes less effort than clearing your inbox. 😇 See what your assets could be doing on EVAA App. App | Support | X | Guides | Ref | SDK

🔥1786🎉4

17 Jul 2026, 11:57 UTC≈3,050 views36 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

From Bridge to Strategy: EVAA Connects the DeFi Flow Inside Telegram 🚀 Putting capital to work in DeFi often requires several separate actions. Assets may start on another network, then need to be bridged to TON, swapped into the right token, supplied as collateral, and borrowed against before a strategy can begin. EVAA is bringing these steps into one connected flow: 1️⃣Bridge brings capital to TON blockchain. 2️⃣

🔥198🎉63

Showing the 12 most recent of 23 posts we hold for @evaatg. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 76,820 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 10 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“EVAA” (@evaatg), 17,654 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/evaatg.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.