Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

AURA

@aura_yields

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

381subscribers

+69 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003193156382
TypeChannel
Username@aura_yields
CreatedBetween 1 September 2025 and 2 December 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live7 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 7 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/aura_yields

Growth

312381346.56 Aug 2026, 01:31 — 312 subscribers6 Aug 2026, 22:17 — 312 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 00:00 — 381 subscribers6 Aug 2026, 01:317 Aug 2026, 00:00
3 measurements taken within a single day, net +69. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 302–391 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
7 Aug 2026, 00:00381+69
6 Aug 2026, 22:17312no change
6 Aug 2026, 01:31312first reading

Engagement

14 posts held, back to 2 December 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
138.3%
avg views ÷ 381 subscribers
Avg views / post
527
4 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.56%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
4
of 14 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 3 of 4 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 August 2026
Posts held14 (2 December 20253 August 2026)
Views total2,107
Reactions total30
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken6 Aug 2026, 22:17 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

87 reactions across 12 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 35.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥3135.6%
2225.3%
👍1618.4%
❤‍🔥44.60%
🫡44.60%
👏33.45%
🤡33.45%
🍾22.30%
😁22.30%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 14 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 87reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 2 December 2025 to 3 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

3 Aug 2026, 17:00 UTC393 views10 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

⚡️RWA Infrastructure: Who Captures the Price of True Liquidity? Today on our X (Twitter), we dissected the RWA infrastructure and explained why tokenization does not conjure liquidity out of thin air. The real game isn't about minting assets, but about execution routing, LVR trap protection, and algorithmic capital management - without which passive yield in pools simply bleeds out. Trillions in institutional capit

🔥82

31 Jul 2026, 17:01 UTC589 views14 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

⚡️ Infrastructure Update: Redesigned AURA Yields Interface We have completely overhauled our main landing page to prioritize instant liquidity deployment and real-time metric transparency. What’s new: ✅ Instant Onboarding: Connect your wallet and deploy your capital immediately above the fold — zero scrolling required. ✅ Live Pool Performance: High-performing pools and their 7-day trailing APRs are now displayed di

🔥74🍾2🤡1

20 Jul 2026, 18:21 UTC185 viewsread 6 August 2026
Photo

📌CLMM solved the capital efficiency problem. But created a management problem. Concentrated Liquidity has been one of the biggest breakthroughs in DeFi. It made capital significantly more efficient. Instead of spreading liquidity across the entire price curve, LPs can now concentrate their capital where most trading actually happens. Returns increased. But so did complexity. Today, a successful LP has to constantly

13 Jul 2026, 11:43 UTC110 viewsread 6 August 2026

A quick note on what keeps concentrated liquidity standing when the market gets hot. A proprietary market maker runs on its own inventory. In calm conditions it quotes a tight spread and everything looks clean. But inventory has a ceiling - push volume or volatility past it and the PMM widens the spread, cuts quote size, or pulls the quote entirely. Exactly when liquidity is needed most. Concentrated liquidity can'

8 Jul 2026, 08:33 UTC616 views5 reactionsread 6 August 2026

⚡️ We've published the first piece in our open research series. Over the past year, a new class of venue has taken hold on the majors—the proprietary market maker (PMM): oracle-anchored, quoting a spread an order of magnitude tighter than concentrated liquidity. The market question is simple: Will they displace CLMM? Our answer: the market doesn't collapse, it segments. ▸ A PMM optimizes execution for the trader. ▸

🔥3👍2

26 Jun 2026, 18:16 UTC86 views3 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

⚡️ Operational Update: TON Pool Routing Risk management is about a cold-headed response to unexpected emergencies. Due to a technical malfunction on the Bidask Protocol side, we have isolated their smart contracts indefinitely and suspended interaction with their gateways. ✅ Bottom line: Your capital is completely safe. Current Status & Next Steps: Withdrawal Status: Bidask’s automated contracts are currently paus

1❤‍🔥1😁1

15 Jun 2026, 10:04 UTC≈1,130 views4 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

🎥 Network Expansion: AURA Yields is Live on Avalanche AURA is continuing its cross-chain scaling. We are executing the next phase of our liquidity strategy by officially deploying our solution on the Avalanche (AVAX) network, powered by a direct integration with Phar.gg. Avalanche’s sub-second finality paired with Phar.gg’s infrastructure provides the exact environment where our architecture thrives. We are bringin

4

1 May 2026, 14:02 UTC109 views4 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

🎥 EVM Expansion: AURA Yields is Live on BNB Chain AURA has officially expanded to EVM networks. We are executing the next phase of our strategy by deploying our solution on the BNB Chain. We are launching with the most highly traded, high-velocity pairs. This is exactly where liquidity providers most desperately need uncompromising LVR protection and zero-lag execution. Active Pools: 💠 BTC/USDT 💠 ETH/USDT 💠 BNB/US

4

30 Jan 2026, 11:59 UTC175 views6 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

⚙️ AURA Yields: The Big Move to Beta! Dear users and Alpha testers! We are starting the technical migration of our infrastructure. This is the final step before moving to the Beta stage. ⚠️ What you need to know right now: Throughout the day, the service may be unstable or experience temporary downtime. But, don't panic! This is a planned process. Your data and positions are safe. As soon as we finish, everythin

🫡4👍2

10 Dec 2025, 16:00 UTC≈5,140 views5 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Video

🤝 AURA Yields is Backed by Yard[hub]! Those who have been following the AURA ecosystem for a while will surely recognize this name. We are excited to officially announce that Yard[hub] — a premier Web3 VC and accelerator — is backing our new product, AURA Yields! This partnership is more than just investment. It is a seal of quality and confirmation that our automated liquidity technology is in demand at the highe

👏3🔥2

9 Dec 2025, 13:29 UTC≈4,550 views12 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

🚀 TBV Backs AURA Yields! Seed Round Secured. We are thrilled to share some major news. TBV has officially announced their support for AURA Yields! Together with Yard[hub] and TVA Ventures, they led our Seed round, backing our vision for the future of DeFi. Why AURA? Fully automated, one-click V3 liquidity management, removing the complexity of manual rebalancing. Expanding reach through strategic integrations with

🔥5👍42😁1

Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @aura_yields. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 165,508 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“AURA” (@aura_yields), 381 subscribers as measured 7 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/aura_yields.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.