Personal blog — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 40% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Observations
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
Content that also appears on other registered channels
Posts published here appear in near-verbatim form on 2 other registered channels. This entry also sits inside a group of 3 channels linked by matching posts, directly or through other channels in the group; two members of the group may share no posts with each other. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.
Matching posts — open both and compare (6 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Channels this entry shares post bodies with, where at least one matching post pair has no forward credit between the two channels, or to a common source, recorded in our data
Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.
What this cannot establish
MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.
Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. None of the 0 matches recorded here fall after that date, so for this entry we cannot say whether any of them carried a credit. The duplication is measured; the absence of attribution is not.
“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 29 comparable posts for this entry, running 22 November 2025 to 9 November 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.
The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.
Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).
Of the group of 3 channels, the one whose matching posts we hold earliest is @ramcode — which is this entry. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.
Recorded under the key clone_source, last confirmed 11 November 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
Channels linked by matching posts
This channel is in a group of 3 registered channels linked by matching posts, directly or through other channels in the group. This channel may share no posts with some of the channels listed below, and listed channels may share none with each other. Links are found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register.
Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown in this list. “First” could only mean first in our own crawl, which depends on how deep we happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. Our one hand-check read 45 of the highest-confidence flagged pairs against the live Telegram pages. In 18 of them the live page showed a “Forwarded from” credit that our database had no record of, so reading that pair as an unattributed copy was wrong; the check did not measure who published first. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Near-verbatim matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.
65 measurements spanning 96 days, net -988. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 77,046–81,759 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 65
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
10 Nov 2026, 09:27
80,227
-136
8 Nov 2026, 20:21
80,363
+139
7 Nov 2026, 09:55
80,224
+89
6 Nov 2026, 10:15
80,135
+129
5 Nov 2026, 06:41
80,006
+122
4 Nov 2026, 07:07
79,884
+138
3 Nov 2026, 05:09
79,746
+267
2 Nov 2026, 03:35
79,479
+151
1 Nov 2026, 05:19
79,328
+115
31 Oct 2026, 05:58
79,213
+101
30 Oct 2026, 05:38
79,112
+248
29 Oct 2026, 09:04
78,864
+535
28 Oct 2026, 04:39
78,329
+73
27 Oct 2026, 02:10
78,256
+214
26 Oct 2026, 03:56
78,042
+276
25 Oct 2026, 06:17
77,766
+176
24 Oct 2026, 04:07
77,590
-71
23 Oct 2026, 05:55
77,661
+12
22 Oct 2026, 03:31
77,649
-84
20 Oct 2026, 21:59
77,733
first reading
Engagement
31 posts held, back to 22 November 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 195 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
13.8%
avg views ÷ 80,227 subscribers
Avg views / post
11,100
8 posts measured
Reaction rate
0%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
8
of 31 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 7 of 8 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 9 November 2026
Posts held
31 (22 November 2025 – 9 November 2026)
Views total
88,840
Reactions total
0
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
11 Nov 2026, 07:32 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
91
Videos
7
Links
93
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Video runtime
30s
Average length
30s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
84,490
across the posts below
Posts paid on
30
of 31 we hold a reading for · 97%
Most on one post
58,200
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @ramcode. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 31 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 22 November 2025 to 9 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 8 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
☕ Обновил прокси для Telegram
Блокировки становятся всё жёстче, поэтому я придумал новые способы обхода. Теперь прокси Proxy.Coffee работают быстро и стабильно: фото, видео и чаты грузятся сразу, даже на мобильном интернете.
☕️ Серверы на любой вкус: от крепкого Espresso до нежного Raf.
🎁 Дарю всем 7 дней бесплатно, без оплаты и привязки карты.
Попробуйте Telegram без VPN и получите стабильное соединение всегда.
…
🧩 @quizzes_bot вырос в настоящую игру
Мой старый бот для викторин — теперь полноценное приложение прямо в Telegram.
🌟 Дуэли умов — 6 раундов против друга или случайного соперника. Ходите по очереди, когда удобно.
🏆 Лиги и рейтинг — от Бронзы до Легенды, задания дня и серии побед.
📣 Вызов на дуэль — отправьте его в чат, канал или сторис: каждый, кто откроет, сыграет с вами.
💭 ~10000 вопросов в 14 темах. И ещё мо…
🤖 Запустил ИИ-агента поддержки для Proxy.Coffee
Telegram недавно добавил новый тип ботов — агентов. Я решил воспользоваться, и доверил агенту самое сложное — поддержку.
☕️ Вот он: @proxy_coffee_agent
Это не просто чат-бот с готовыми ответами. Агент сам видит нужные данные пользователя и решает проблему до конца:
🔑 находит ваши ссылки и ключи
💳 проверяет оплату и баланс
⚙️ разбирается, почему не подключается, и по…
Продаю готовый проект @vybot — бота для скачивания видео с YouTube
🔥 Короткий тематический юзернейм: 5 символов, где vy — video + youtube.
Бот долго был заброшен, но успел собрать 70 тыс. пользователей. Я полностью переписал его с нуля — теперь это новый быстрый бот с готовой базой.
🚀 Такие боты растут сами: людям нужно скачать видео, и они делятся ботом с друзьями. Мой прошлый бот так набрал 390 тыс. пользователе…
🏀 Вчера я выпустил большое обновление в @gibot
В прошлой версии Дуров проиграл мне матч в баскетболе — сейчас у него появился шанс на реванш 😂
🎮 Теперь это целый мини-апп, и никакого рандома: итог матча зависит только от вас. Целитесь свайпом или гироскопом и сами задаёте силу и подкрутку.
🎁 Можно разыграть до 10 NFT-подарков или Telegram Premium. Побеждает тот, кто лучше играет, а не тот, у кого больше ботов, как…
🏎 Tesla вновь удивила весь мир
Спустя почти 9 лет ожидания Илон Маск наконец показал новый Roadster. Я как дикий фанат Tesla пересмотрел презентацию уже несколько раз.
🛞 А версия Thrust способна разогнаться до 97 км/ч всего за 0,81 секунды. Быстрее, чем вы успеете моргнуть.
Максимальная скорость — больше 370 км/ч, запас хода — около 480 км.
🚀 И да, он умеет летать — ускорители для него разработали вместе со Space…
👨💻 Каждый раз, когда запускаю нового бота, отдельная задача — подключить платёжку.
Карты, СБП, крипта, подписки — хочется, чтобы всё это работало сразу и в одном месте.
💳 Именно так это устроено в platega.io: все способы оплаты в одном личном кабинете.
А подключается всё через готовые конструкторы для ботов и сайтов или по API. Меньше настроек — больше времени на сам проект.
👉 Подробнее о сервисе и комиссиях —…
🌐 Встречайте WEB-прокси!
Telegram выпустил обновление для iOS и Android с новым форматом прокси: он маскирует трафик под обычный сайт, и заблокировать его гораздо сложнее.
☕️ Новые WEB-прокси уже доступны в Proxy.Coffee:
▸ стабильнее и быстрее обычных
▸ не конфликтуют с VPN
▸ подключаются в один клик
Обновите Telegram до последней версии и подключайтесь!
🟢 Открыть: бот / мини-апп
😱 Выпустил бота-призрака
Решил вспомнить былые времена и сделать что-то, чего вы ещё не видели тут.
🤖 И вот запустил бота без юзернейма. Совсем. Ни @, ни ссылки, в поиске его не найти. Внутри полноценный мини-апп.
Похоже, это первый такой бот-призрак с мини-аппом. Как он появился тут — никто не должен знать 🤫
👻 Обитает он в DC2 Telegram. Заходите, гуляйте по залам и кидайте фотки оттуда в комментарии.
Попробуйте…
☕️ Сижу в Telegram почти 24/7 и уже не представляю его без прокси — своих же, Proxy.Coffee.
Вчера выкатил обновление: прокси для Telegram и WhatsApp стали быстрее и стабильнее, а мини-апп полностью переделан.
VPN тоже беру там же — всё летает.
☕️ Попробуйте: бот / мини-апп
💳 Оплата зарубежных сервисов в последнее время — лотерея
Виртуальные карты отклоняются одна за другой: то платёж не проходит без внятной причины, то сервис просто не принимает такую карту.
👍 Тот, на котором я в итоге остановился — Zarub. Ни разу не подвёл. Буквально вчера оплачивал через него Claude — прошло моментально.
Что там есть:
→ Виртуальные зарубежные карты для Claude, ChatGPT, Spotify и остальных сервисо…
Showing the 12 most recent of 31 posts we hold for @ramcode. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
1
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
0
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
1
vacant every time we have ever looked
@ramcode named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
@rebooks2bot named in 8 posts, 8 August 2026 – 18 August 2026
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
فوائد لغوية في اللغة العربية (أحمد مكاوي) @Ahmad_Makkawy · 1,782#39
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 6 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
CRYPTO LUDIK @gamerludoman · 386,450 Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 63 here — alongside 62 others — read 6 September 2026
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Domains linked from posts
3 domains this channel’s own posts have linked to, measured by scanning the post bodies themselves — not the channel’s description, which is the separate Declared links section below when this entry has one. Appearing here is not a claim about who runs the linked site or why the channel linked to it; an advertisement, a news citation and a malicious link all leave the same kind of row.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“RamCode” (@ramcode), 80,227 subscribers as measured 10 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ramcode.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.