Channel
@racialnat
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
130subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003769470541 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @racialnat |
| Description | ♱Blood & Soil♱ |
| Created | Between 1 February 2026 and 31 May 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 9 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/racialnat |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 9 Aug 2026, 01:15 | 130 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 18:03 | 130 | first reading |
19 posts held, back to 31 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 19 (31 May 2026 – 2 August 2026) |
| Views total | 383 |
| Reactions total | 32 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 9 Aug 2026, 01:15 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 9 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
244 reactions across 19 posts, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 244 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 244reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 31 May 2026 to 2 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Community-building will be an ongoing project from this point on, and will continue even after political independence is achieved. It will be the primary function of the Homeland to be just that, a homeland and refuge for all the persecuted and endangered Aryan peoples of the world from Afrikaners to Serbs to Ulstermen. Racially conscious White immigrants coming into the Homeland will hereafter be referred to as Inco…
❤15
But Europe has sown one spirit, and because of it Europe cannot perish. If European merchants sought to encompass the entire world, there were European martyrs and heroes who, with love and honor, sowed the spirit of true Europe throughout the world and carried it through all regions. Even the sun is not without spots, and neither is the spirit of Europe without its sins. But the sun is not famous for its spots, bu…
❤17
On racial hygiene: From what has been said so far, it is clear that the object that racial hygiene seeks to protect is the race, not the individual, that is, the present collection of individuals. Racial hygiene is inexorable and unbreakable where the future and interests of the race are at stake. It does not hesitate to strike at an individual without restraint and without mercy, only if the interests of the race d…
❤11
ZBOR's emigration newspaper "Iskra" on Apartheid: Blacks? You see them here as some kind of addition to even the best European comfort. They clean, prepare, cook, serve - and all this conscientiously and neatly, and with a certain kindness. We just have to accept them as they really are. Good-natured, naive, childish. Although they use all the achievements of modern civilization, they are still primitive in their wa…
❤14
St. Nikolaj on Miscegenation: ...[the state] loses in intensity of spiritual and moral strength; for it becomes a mixture of blood, language, and mood, and such a mixture produces fear, restlessness, selfishness, robbery, and a feeling of constant insecurity. - St. Nikolaj Velimirović Nationalism of Saint Sava, year 1935.
❤13
St. Nikolaj on the Divine Mandate of Europe. And when Christ appeared in such a European hospital and madhouse through his servants, it was as if he said what he had said to the woman who had been crippled for eighteen years: Europe, you are forgiven of your disease (Luke 13:12). And suddenly Europe was corrected, enlightened, enlightened, purified, and educated. Like when someone opens the windows in a prison, and c…
❤14
When the indigenous people express their discontent for being dominated by the whites, I tell them that without us they would no longer exist, since they would have killed each other off or would have ended up in the cooking-pot of the Pahouins [also known as the Fang, a leading Gabonese tribe]. They cannot rebut this argument. In general, despite the mischief for which the whites are guilty in their work of colonisa…
❤11
„Ми, у ЗБОР-у на које толико вичу да смо противници владе народа, стварно смо данас једини поборници праве, истинске народне владавине. Јер шта ми хоћемо? Ми хоћемо да политички инструменти за владање не буду странке, већ природне народне скупине - сталежи. Преко њих, моћи ће поједине групе народа бирати људе које знају, и који ће бити дужни да своме сталежу редовно полажу рачуна о своме раду, тако да сталеж, у свако…
❤10
A nation is a racial-historical reality. Every nation. And each one as such is a new developmental possibility for humanity, because it is a new possible influence of a new expression. And national history is nothing more than the search for that expression that corresponds to national development possibilities. It is therefore a sin against humanity to impoverish its history and its physiognomy - this is the attitud…
❤11
...since Montenegro has existed as a Slavic country, it has always known only about the theory of opposing evil. This theory was preached in churches with the cross and the gospel, preached at councils with song and the harp, preached by old and young, saints and wise, women and men. And this sermon raised the spirit of the small Montenegrin tribe to such an extent that it was able to resist for centuries the greates…
❤15
And remember, my child, blood and blood makes a nation. Blood is eternal. The blood of a newborn child is thousands of years old. The child is young, and the blood in him is the old blood that flowed in the veins of his ancestors thousands of years ago. People are born and disappear, but blood remains. It is passed from one person to another. And my blood, my dear child, flows in your veins. And if you had not decid…
❤13
The entire Serbian people are one organic community, and as such they should be organized. Not according to the will of the majority of votes, but according to the demands of life, the interests of the entire community - every job and every need should be organized and taken care of. Spirituality is the source from which the entire social and economic order emanates. The people cannot conform to either a capitalist …
❤13
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @racialnat. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 180,173 of 1,345,403entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@racialnat named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Bulletin𖦏” (@racialnat), 130 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/racialnat.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.