Не кодингом едины! Скоро день рождения компании и в честь этого я освоил еще один инструмен на ИИ higgsfield.ai. Решил подготовить ролик про нас в стиле бумажного дома ) Оцените 👍 или 🤮
🔥9👍5😁3🤮1
Signed Антон Фокин

Channel
@qtim_anton
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
215subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002090261374 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @qtim_anton |
| Description | Про Qtim, разработку, бизнес и все около того. Почему так называется канал читай в первом сообщении или закрепе. Для связи: @qtim71 |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 7 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/qtim_anton |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 7 Aug 2026, 03:32 | 215 | no change |
| 5 Aug 2026, 22:06 | 215 | first reading |
15 posts held, back to 28 November 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 15 (28 November 2024 – 6 August 2026) |
| Views total | 428 |
| Reactions total | 65 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Aug 2026, 03:32 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 7 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
301 reactions across 14 posts, in 16 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 44.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 133 | 44.2% | |
| 👍 | 57 | 18.9% | |
| ❤ | 54 | 17.9% | |
| 🙏 | 18 | 5.98% | |
| 👏 | 10 | 3.32% | |
| 😁 | 7 | 2.33% | |
| 🎄 | 6 | 1.99% | |
| ⚡ | 4 | 1.33% | |
| 🎉 | 4 | 1.33% | |
| 🤗 | 2 | 0.664% | |
| 👌 | 1 | 0.332% | |
| 👎 | 1 | 0.332% | |
| 💩 | 1 | 0.332% | |
| 🕊 | 1 | 0.332% | |
| 🤔 | 1 | 0.332% | |
| 🤮 | 1 | 0.332% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 301reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 28 November 2024 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Не кодингом едины! Скоро день рождения компании и в честь этого я освоил еще один инструмен на ИИ higgsfield.ai. Решил подготовить ролик про нас в стиле бумажного дома ) Оцените 👍 или 🤮
🔥9👍5😁3🤮1
Signed Антон Фокин
Ещё несколько лет назад я был убеждённым противником фулстек-разработки. Хотя за свою карьеру успел побыть и фронтендером, и бэкендером, и даже мобильным разработчиком на React Native. Но в какой-то момент пришло время взрослеть, и я окончательно ушёл в бэкенд. Мне нравилось думать, проектировать и решать сложные задачи, а работа с визуальной частью особого удовольствия не приносила. Но всё течёт, всё меняется — ос…
👍10🔥9❤5
Signed Антон Фокин
Завтра возвращаюсь )
🔥5👍4
Signed Антон Фокин
Video, posted without a caption
🔥10❤4
Signed Антон Фокин
У меня тут интервью взяли. Первый раз такое делал ) Кому интересно можно почитать по ссылке Рассказал, как начал и как нашел миссию и цель, когда деньги не можешь поставить на первое место.
🔥25👏8👍6👌1👎1💩1🙏1
Signed Антон Фокин
Все мы хотим узнавать что-то новое и хотим это узнавать у тех, кто прошел какой-то непростой путь и достиг высот. Хотим узнать, где лежат грабли и как на них не наступить. Хотим узнать, где же все наши лиды и как вообще стать известным. Чаще всего эти знания мы получаем на различных мероприятиях типа форумов, конференций и т.д. и т.п. Мы часто смотрим на список спикеров, видим там известные компании, которые продела…
❤13🔥5⚡4🎉4🕊1
Signed Антон Фокин
Posted without readable text
Qtim - ТОП 15 в России!!! Топам рынка пришлось подвинуться — Qtim в Рейтинге Рунета занял крутые позиции. У нас в общей сложности 68 позиций в разных срезах в этом году, но покажу вам самые-самые топовые и значимые для нас. Сайты и веб-сервисы: — 15 место в общем рейтинге сложных проектов — 11 место в категории «Сайт/веб-сервис под ключ» — 1 место по Туле — 31 место по России — 1 место в сфере «Образовательные пл…
🔥20❤15👍9😁4🤔1
Signed Антон Фокин
Офис Qtim находится в «Октаве», и за время пока мы тут, я успел привыкнуть, что тут всегда что-то происходит. Но 26 апреля — особенный день: кластеру 7 лет, и по этому поводу большой фестиваль. В программе — TED-talk’и, мастер-классы, лекции, музыка, подкасты, ужин с парфюмерным сопровождением и прочие нестандартные активности. Вечером — концерты Thomas Mraz, Mirèle и Антона Лаврентьева. Если будете рядом — загляни…
🔥10❤1
Signed Антон Фокин
P.S. Завтра все это мероприятие будет по ссылочке
👍6🔥2
Signed Антон Фокин
Завтра в 14:00 приму участие в дискуссии на тему «Стоимость разработки ПО в 2025: сколько на самом деле платят успешные компании и как не переплатить миллионы?» Переходите по ссылке. Очень актуальная тема в последнее время. Стало приходить довольно много клиентов, от которых мы часто слышим фразу: - нам в другой компании предложили гораздо дешевле На что я обычно отвечаю: - ваша задача — выпустить проект или помен…
🔥12👍2👏2❤1🤗1
Signed Антон Фокин
Давно ничего тут не писал, но планирую исправляться) На самом деле есть много того, о чем хочется рассказать, но все упирается во время и ресурсы. Сейчас для себя сформировал целый список инструментов, которые помогают и распланировать свое время и оптимизировать работу. О них как раз рассказал в посте
🔥4
Signed Антон Фокин
Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @qtim_anton. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Сходи к Антону” (@qtim_anton), 215 subscribers as measured 7 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/qtim_anton.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.