Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

ВОЗДУХ для специалистов. Супервизия для психологов

@psyvozd

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

22subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002199753651
TypeChannel
Username@psyvozd
DescriptionСупервизии и практические инструменты для психологов и помогающих специалистов от студии "Воздух" онлайн
CreatedBetween 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded11 August 2026
Last confirmed live11 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/psyvozd

Growth

227 August 2026 — 22 subscribers11 August 2026 — 22 subscribers7 August 202611 August 2026
2 measurements spanning 4 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 21–23 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
11 Aug 2026, 13:3222no change
7 Aug 2026, 23:0822first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 14 October 2024the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 23 January 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
13
Videos
2
Links
11

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
2m 16s
Average length
1m 08s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

53 reactions across 16 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 49.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
2649.1%
😁1018.9%
🎉713.2%
👍47.55%
🔥47.55%
😱23.77%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 53reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 14 October 2024 to 23 January 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

23 Jan 2025, 13:27 UTC35 views2 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Forwarded from @taktozhebyvaet

меж тем несмотря ни на что, мы с коллегами таки запускаем Психологический клуб "Воздух", а именно годовую ШКОЛУ СЕМЕЙНЫХ ОТНОШЕНИЙ Воздух! Уф! написала и так волнительно стало. Присоединяйтесь если вам тоже интересна тема семейных отношений и улучшения их качества. Участие в клубе по подписке, но на канале будут и бесплатные материалы, надеюсь интересные и полезные https://t.me/familyvozduh

2

23 Jan 2025, 13:27 UTC40 viewsread 11 August 2026

приходите, коллеги!) новый формат, но надеюсь будет полезно)

11 Jan 2025, 03:49 UTC52 views1 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Forwarded from @polina_gaverdovskaya

Низкая мотивация Недавно для нового проекта (скоро расскажу) я пыталась заново подсчитать свой стаж работы в психотерапии и психологическом консультировании — в разных цифрах (клиенто-часы, преподавание, супервизия, личная терапия). Уже не вышло, поэтому не привожу. Короче: много. И с опорой на эти годы часов хочу пару слов сказать о мотивации человека к психологической работе. Не важно, какой: самопознание, обучени

1

29 Dec 2024, 08:51 UTC51 views3 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Forwarded from @marianna_zbronskaya_proVideo

#супервизор_супервизанту В продолжение обсуждения феномена избегания Олеся Катаева "По горячим следам супервизий" - о разговорах о третьих лицах. Все высказывания супервизоров можно увидеть на канале rutube

3

20 Dec 2024, 11:43 UTC68 views5 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Forwarded from @more_than_a_businessVideo

Video, posted without a caption

🔥2😁2😱1

20 Dec 2024, 11:43 UTC57 views1 reactionsread 11 August 2026

вот тоже хорошее про то почему и как может уходить клиент)

1

20 Dec 2024, 11:43 UTC59 views3 reactionsread 11 August 2026

3. Процесс, который может разворачиваться в этот момент. Ваша терапевтическая работа может затронуть (и скорее всего, затронет, если вы хорошо работаете) какой-то глубинный опыт клиента, зачастую травматический и плохо осознаваемый. Это вообще переживать довольно неприятно, а саморегулироваться и выдерживать напряжение умеют не все (этот навык приходится тренировать, ага). И тогда клиент может банально отыгрывать с

👍3

19 Dec 2024, 15:53 UTC44 views5 reactionsread 11 August 2026

Клиент разочарован/недоволен/уходит от вас или из терапии вообще. Во-первых, хочу начать с того что я сама была с обеих сторон и с обеих сторон это довольно неприятно, возможно даже больно и зачастую непросто. И рассмотреть эту ситуацию хочу с нескольких ракурсов, как говорят супервизоры, "фокусов внимания": 1. Что происходит с клиентом 2. Что происходит с терапевтом 3. Что за процесс может разворачиваться в этот нап

5

18 Dec 2024, 15:05 UTC44 views3 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Poll

говорили ли вам клиенты что-то подобное: "мне не подходит терапия с вами, вы как специалист, не эффективно, не доволен" и тп?

  1. да, бывает67%
  2. нет, пока не говорили11%
  3. я в ужасе что могут сказать и а целом боюсь этого11%
  4. я клиент, сам такое говорил) и говорю!11%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

3

18 Dec 2024, 13:03 UTC176 views1 reactionsread 11 August 2026

Клиент сказал что ему не подходит терапия/не нравитесь вы как терапевт/терапия не помогает или делает только хуже/он разочарован. Что делать?

😱1

18 Dec 2024, 10:39 UTC46 views3 reactionsread 11 August 2026

Если у вас есть дети/вы планируете детей/вы ребенок/у вас есть семья/нет семьи, но очень хочется, в общем если вы живой человек - вам необходимо срочно подписаться на канал нашего самого важного сейчас в студии Воздух проекта - Школа Семейных Отношений t.me/familyvozduh Почему? мы там много рассказываем и показываем про то что мы знаем о про семью, очевидные и неочевидные трудности внутри семьи, как с ними справлятьс

3

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @psyvozd. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

18 Dec 2024, 15:05 UTCAnonymous Poll9 voters

говорили ли вам клиенты что-то подобное: "мне не подходит терапия с вами, вы как специалист, не эффективно, не доволен" и тп?

  1. да, бывает67%
  2. нет, пока не говорили11%
  3. я в ужасе что могут сказать и а целом боюсь этого11%
  4. я клиент, сам такое говорил) и говорю!11%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 14 October 2024 to 23 January 2025. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“ВОЗДУХ для специалистов. Супервизия для психологов” (@psyvozd), 22 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/psyvozd.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.