Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Другая Жизнь

@psyofgd

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

2,132subscribers

+2 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001472894992
TypeChannel
Username@psyofgd
CreatedBetween 1 April 2019 and 31 August 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live11 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 11 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/psyofgd

Growth

2,1302,1322,1317 August 2026 — 2,130 subscribers8 August 2026 — 2,130 subscribers11 August 2026 — 2,132 subscribers7 August 202611 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 4 days, net +2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,130–2,132 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
11 Aug 2026, 06:562,132+2
8 Aug 2026, 01:232,130no change
7 Aug 2026, 08:472,130first reading

Engagement

18 posts held, back to 14 May 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
8.24%
avg views ÷ 2,132 subscribers
Avg views / post
176
4 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.71%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
4
of 18 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026
Posts held18 (14 May 20266 August 2026)
Views total703
Reactions total12
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 16:56 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

64 reactions across 18 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 32.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
2132.8%
🔥1726.6%
😁1015.6%
👍69.38%
❤‍🔥23.13%
👌23.13%
😱23.13%
🤔23.13%
💩11.56%
😢11.56%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 64reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 14 May 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

6 Aug 2026, 13:14 UTC86 views4 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Говоря, что у меня много работы в июле, я не мог предположить, что в августе ее будет еще больше! Поддержка семьи, групповая психотерапия и мечта снова жить на море - отлично заряжают. Но и отдохнуть охота 🤣 Пришлось даже договорится на новый комп, благо жена убедила сделать запрос в компанию, где сейчас работаю. Аутсорс конечно самый динамичный рынок, что не скажи)

2❤‍🔥2

1 Aug 2026, 18:19 UTC165 views3 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Цена решений Кризис в IT обсуждают даже те, кто никогда и не прикасался к нему, разработка игр не исключение. Однако не всегда, что нам рассказывают является истиной и дело далеко не только в ИИ или же ковидном буме АйТи. Как и в любой другой отрасли часто массовые сокращения, потеря прибыли и закрытия компаний связаны с отрицательными решениями руководства. Я намеренно не называю это ошибками, так как эти решени

👍3

26 Jul 2026, 14:04 UTC234 views2 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Я на последней главе и пока не согласен с этим мнением. Лично для меня отличное дополнение ко всем частям франшизы. Зато я узнал почему Until Dawn 2 не делают Supermassive. А теперь дальше отдыхать буду:)

👌2

25 Jul 2026, 08:16 UTC218 views3 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Наверное самая загруженная работой неделя в течении трех лет. Еще могу:) Но и выдыхать надо, и спина уже не так🤣 Отдыхаю так: 1) переключение 2) нестандартные рутинные дела (даже завтрак готовлю детям не банальный, а микс всяких штук) 3) работа на пониженных (не могу полностью выключится из процессов пока отладка идет) А вы там что?) Зато прошел половину 8020 Directive и буду скоро рассказывать свои впечатления!

🔥3

12 Jul 2026, 15:11 UTC291 views3 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Из нового, открыл для себя игры поэмы. Плейтайм 5-15 минут, основная цель: донести одну важную мысль. https://www.gamepoems.com/ Немного изучил проекты и сразу же подался на участие в качестве ревьювера ко второй пачке игр. Искренне считаю, что такие игры в будущем наберут обороты. По сути это форма искусства, которая будет понятна гараздо большему числу людей со временем. Рекомендую посмотреть:) Сам тоже заду

🔥3

11 Jul 2026, 22:10 UTC273 views2 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Посмотрел первый тайм, бодро. Немного удивлен, что у Норвегии в гугл больше фанатов, с другой стороны дикая сила хайпа:) Затащат? Посмотрим.

🔥2

7 Jul 2026, 20:38 UTC315 views7 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Жизнь, как Roguelite Детство - перерождение - юность - перерождение - молодость… Каждый этап несет за собой что-то новое, однако и старый опыт мы используем. Возвращаешься в стартовую локацию (хотя и она порой меняется) и начинаешь каждый день по новой. Правда вот по мере скопления опыта и навыков, будто становится сложнее выбирать путь. Особенно если пару лет не двигаешься никуда.. Геймеры поймут, надеюсь и не

5🤔2

27 Jun 2026, 18:53 UTC363 views6 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Лучший прогрев перед июльским движем.

😁3😱21

18 Jun 2026, 09:00 UTC406 views6 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Проголосовало 40 чел, реакции в телеграм ставит 5 максимум, как это работает?:) А пока будни молодого (или уже не очень молодого? 31 все ж стукнуло) отца: «Найден баг, помогите…»😁

😁6

10 Jun 2026, 12:12 UTC289 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Рекомендую “подкаст”) А сам пока готовлюсь к новым начинаниям, правда не до конца понимаю каким) Если что с работой все стабильно, это и позволяет готовиться!

🔥1

10 Jun 2026, 12:12 UTC368 views7 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @manadjarPhoto

ребята, со 2 июля я запускаю серию онлайн-встреч с интересными и опытными экспертами в области креативной индустрии. будем говорить о лидерстве, менеджменте и другим вопросам управления ❤️ - первый мой гость - Василий Скобелев, левел-дизайн директор, автор книги “Левел-дизайн хорошего тона”, участник разработки известных игровых проектов - приглашаем всех желающих) - дата и время эфира с Василием Скобелевым - 2 ию

3🔥3😁1

Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @psyofgd. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,079,379 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Другая Жизнь” (@psyofgd), 2,132 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/psyofgd.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.