Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Money focus. Mr Banks

Channel

Money focus. Mr Banks

@CryyptoFocus

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

14,060subscribers

+312 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001824777260
TypeChannel
Username@CryyptoFocus
DescriptionIt's about making a difference in your life and others. Given you inspiration and information about financial, business, travel, family. #news #trading #fx #FXnews #FXbook
CreatedBetween 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live21 August 2026
Measurements held14
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 21 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/CryyptoFocus

Growth

13,74814,06013,9047 August 2026 — 13,748 subscribers8 August 2026 — 13,787 subscribers9 August 2026 — 13,838 subscribers10 August 2026 — 13,891 subscribers11 August 2026 — 13,949 subscribers12 August 2026 — 13,940 subscribers13 August 2026 — 13,957 subscribers15 August 2026 — 13,991 subscribers16 August 2026 — 14,038 subscribers17 August 2026 — 14,039 subscribers18 August 2026 — 14,025 subscribers19 August 2026 — 14,016 subscribers20 August 2026 — 14,006 subscribers21 August 2026 — 14,060 subscribers7 August 202621 August 2026
14 measurements spanning 14 days, net +312. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 13,701–14,107 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
21 Aug 2026, 23:4814,060+54
20 Aug 2026, 16:0214,006-10
19 Aug 2026, 17:2114,016-9
18 Aug 2026, 20:1614,025-14
17 Aug 2026, 21:0514,039+1
16 Aug 2026, 18:1714,038+47
15 Aug 2026, 06:3813,991+34
13 Aug 2026, 23:5813,957+17
12 Aug 2026, 16:5513,940-9
11 Aug 2026, 13:4513,949+58
10 Aug 2026, 12:2213,891+53
9 Aug 2026, 09:5313,838+51
8 Aug 2026, 09:1113,787+39
7 Aug 2026, 12:4613,748first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 18 May 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 29 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
32.4%
avg views ÷ 14,060 subscribers
Avg views / post
4,560
2 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.461%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
2
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 August 2026
Posts held20 (18 May 20262 August 2026)
Views total9,120
Reactions total42
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken22 Aug 2026, 12:59 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
156
Links
179

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 22 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

680 reactions across 20 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 53.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
36553.7%
🙏9313.7%
🔥8913.1%
💯7611.2%
👍284.12%
🕊111.62%
❤‍🔥50.735%
👎50.735%
🤣40.588%
🎉30.441%
💩10.147%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 680reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 18 May 2026 to 2 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
2
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 20 we hold a reading for · 5%
Most on one post
2
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @CryyptoFocus. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 18 May 2026 to 2 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

2 Aug 2026, 02:41 UTC≈4,540 views22 reactionsread 22 August 2026

FREE METHODS TO BE POSTED HERE NOW

22

17 Jul 2026, 22:25 UTC≈10,700 views31 reactions2 Starsread 22 August 2026

https://t.me/+Dq_ojZqfbs80YjAy

25👎5💩1

13 Jul 2026, 17:26 UTC≈10,300 views59 reactionsread 22 August 2026
Photo

You’re not depressed, you just need a Porsche GT3 RS in your parking space. Money Focus ✅️

🔥30💯15👍86

12 Jul 2026, 09:05 UTC≈7,240 views39 reactionsread 22 August 2026
Photo

Dear son, dream big. the world isn't on a budget. Money Focus ✅️

30💯7👍2

11 Jul 2026, 03:15 UTC≈6,000 views32 reactionsread 22 August 2026
Photo

Outside with my brother🩶 Money Focus ✅️

23💯6🔥3

8 Jul 2026, 06:07 UTC≈4,800 views46 reactionsread 22 August 2026
Photo

Dear Brother, Pay the price! Money Focus ✅️

💯2214🔥6👍2🤣2

4 Jul 2026, 19:45 UTC≈4,470 views40 reactionsread 22 August 2026
Photo

This setup created more millionaires than business schools. Money Focus ✅️

29💯7🔥4

2 Jul 2026, 16:41 UTC≈4,080 views30 reactionsread 22 August 2026
Photo

When prosperity becomes a lifestyle, even the smallest member of the family enjoys a front row seat to success. 🤍 Money Focus ✅️

22🔥4👍3💯1

1 Jul 2026, 14:19 UTC≈3,590 views33 reactionsread 22 August 2026
Photo

Money festing ! 💸🤑 May July bring you bountiful of blessings and financial stability! ✨ Money Focus ✅️

🙏225🔥4💯2

25 Jun 2026, 09:38 UTC≈3,380 views92 reactionsread 22 August 2026
Photo

If this pops up on your timeline, You will be rich soon. 🙏🏾 Money Focus ✅️

57🔥15🙏8🕊6🎉3💯2❤‍🔥1

18 Jun 2026, 05:15 UTC≈3,270 views21 reactionsread 22 August 2026
Photo

Quick reminder : Nobody is coming to save you. Not your friends. Not your family. Not the government They can offer advice and tools. But at the end of the day, it's up to you to change your mind and act regardless of how you feel. Money Focus ✅️

14👍4💯1🔥1🕊1

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @CryyptoFocus. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Xavier replies 😂🤣
@xavierzone · 64,939
Telegram ranks this channel #50 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 21 August 2026
MEN MONEY MINDSET 📚💼
@Men_Money_Mindset · 70,366
Telegram ranks this channel #85 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 20 August 2026

This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 21 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Money focus. Mr Banks” (@CryyptoFocus), 14,060 subscribers as measured 21 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/CryyptoFocus.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.