Конечно, всю информацию невозможно оформить в статье поэтому я предлагаю еще ознакомиться с интересной гипотезой об ии и бреде\паранойе
👍2

Channel
@psychologiststasy
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
143subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001789568822 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @psychologiststasy |
| Description | Анастасия Тюрина - Клинический психолог • КБТ, АСТ, ДБТ https://psychologiststasy.tilda.ws/ |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 31 March 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 8 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/psychologiststasy |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Aug 2026, 21:45 | 143 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 17:43 | 143 | first reading |
16 posts held, back to 18 November 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 16 posts for this entry, the most recent from 16 March 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
271 reactions across 16 posts, in 17 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 20.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 55 | 20.3% | |
| custom 5285101018873349498 | 47 | 17.3% | |
| ❤🔥 | 27 | 9.96% | |
| custom 5397589678394201256 | 22 | 8.12% | |
| 👍 | 22 | 8.12% | |
| custom 5296503426899798289 | 21 | 7.75% | |
| custom 5298798292350555226 | 11 | 4.06% | |
| custom 5353018388991994456 | 11 | 4.06% | |
| custom 5373173725619317119 | 11 | 4.06% | |
| custom 5253577011187688430 | 9 | 3.32% | |
| custom 5260327235193153855 | 9 | 3.32% | |
| custom 5350755383608631108 | 9 | 3.32% | |
| custom 5465665854928609472 | 7 | 2.58% | |
| custom 5330105249568933584 | 4 | 1.48% | |
| custom 5402329505517822147 | 4 | 1.48% | |
| custom 5355287750926950050 | 1 | 0.369% | |
| custom 5406947351275250475 | 1 | 0.369% |
Custom emoji. 14 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 271reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 18 November 2025 to 16 March 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @psychologiststasy. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 16 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 18 November 2025 to 16 March 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Конечно, всю информацию невозможно оформить в статье поэтому я предлагаю еще ознакомиться с интересной гипотезой об ии и бреде\паранойе
👍2
Гипотеза о том, что разговорные чат-боты на основе искусственного интеллекта (ИИ) могут провоцировать бред и паранойю у некоторых людей, по-видимому, превратилась в реальность. Статья Британского журнала психиатрии. http://dushevnoezdorove.ru/index.php/stati/172-razgovornye-chat-boty-na-osnove-iskusstvennogo-intellekta-mogut-provotsirovat-bred-i-paranojyu-u-nekotorykh-lyudej
custom 52851010188733494985custom 52965034268997982893custom 53975896783942012563👍1
❓ Может ли искусственный интеллект заменить людям живое общение? Своим мнением на эту тему поделилась с журналистами "Вечернего Барнаула" медицинский психолог АККПБ им. Эрдмана Анастасия Тюрина. Сейчас набирают популярность приложения, где ты можешь создать ИИ-друга. Суть их в том, что по мере общения нейросеть привыкает к вашему стилю разговора и подстраивается под него для максимального комфорта. Так, люди постепе…
custom 52851010188733494987custom 52965034268997982895custom 53975896783942012564❤2
Все начали панику насчет тг Я не паникую, но за компанию и я с вопросом! Создать ли там канал по теме 🤔
custom 52965034268997982895custom 53975896783942012561
Сидишь ВКонтакте?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
custom 52965034268997982892
😄😅😘😇😀 Многие думают, что весна - это пора пробуждения и энергии. Но для многих людей - и в том числе тех, кто живёт с психическими расстройствами - весна может стать периодом повышенного риска. И это не миф, а научный факт, подтвержденный МКБ-11 /ICD-11 (Международной классификации болезней, 11-е пересмотренное издание). (У нас в России используется МКБ-10, но она более старая по сравнению МКБ-11) В МКБ-11 весенние…
❤9custom 52965034268997982893custom 52987982923505552263custom 53731737256193171192custom 53975896783942012561custom 54023295055178221471
Многие думают, что весна – это пора пробуждения и энергии. Однако для некоторых людей – и в том числе тех, кто живёт с психическими расстройствами, – весна может стать периодом обострения болезни. И это не миф, а научный факт, подтвержденный экспертами. ❓ Почему даже у людей «без диагнозов» меняется настроение весной? На этот вопрос отвечает клинический психолог АККПБ им. Эрдмана Анастасия Тюрина. ✔️ Увеличение …
❤6custom 52851010188733494982custom 53975896783942012562
Да, большую часть писала я😎 Но здесь не вписали аспекты, которые я считаю важными: опора на научную базу и упоминание расстройств/важных симптомов, поэтому своим подписчикам я предлагаю почитать и изучить полную версию данной статьи. (следующий пост от меня будет про это)
👍5custom 53731737256193171192custom 54023295055178221472
💚 Стигматизация 💚 Стигматизация психических расстройств остается одной из самых острых проблем современного общества. Часто страх осуждения, опасности, ярлык «ненормальности» пугает гораздо сильнее, чем сами симптомы болезни. 🖤 Важно понимать, что психическое расстройство — это не слабость и не повод для стыда, а состояние, которое требует профессиональной (медицинской и/или психологической поддержки), так же как и…
❤9custom 52987982923505552267custom 53731737256193171197custom 53975896783942012565custom 52965034268997982891
«🔠🔠🔠🔠» в тренде: почему все так любят ярлыки ? Стигматизация: 🔵В интернете – громкие видео/рилсы/тиктоки про «забывчивость, откладывание» и приписывают это себе даже те, у кого нет диагноза. Результат: к врачам приходят ~ 30 % клиентов с фразой «Я уверен(а), что у меня 🧠!». Но исследования показывают: что у более 65 % людей - обычная усталость, тревога или недостаточно развита самодисциплина и планирование. 🟣Среди (…
👍9❤5custom 52535770111876884303custom 53975896783942012562custom 52965034268997982891custom 52987982923505552261custom 54023295055178221471
🤩«Вещи, которые я, человек с ПРЛ, оставляю в 2025 году.» 🤩 Автор itsrainingbpd (Inst)* Перевод Anne Green Moon Пост взят из канала психиатра Елисеенко Новый год не означает, что вам нужно стать другим человеком, иногда это значит - выживать с большей осведомленностью/осознанностью. 🎀 Я больше не буду «уменьшаться» ради чужого удовольствия или принятия. Люди, которые меня любят, будут видеть меня такой, какая я ес…
❤🔥10custom 53507553836086311085custom 53530183889919944564❤2custom 52851010188733494981custom 53975896783942012561
С Новым 2026 годом 🧸🤩
custom 528510101887334949815custom 53530183889919944567❤5custom 53507553836086311084👍1custom 52965034268997982891custom 53552877509269500501
Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @psychologiststasy. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Сидишь ВКонтакте?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 18 November 2025 to 16 March 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Анастасия | Клинический Психолог” (@psychologiststasy), 143 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/psychologiststasy.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.