Channel
@psy_martynova_anna
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
55subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001442268432 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @psy_martynova_anna |
| Description | Анна Мартынова - психолог-консультант, коуч, специалист в области развития лидерства и потенциала. Записаться на консультацию и задать вопрос: @ta_annamartynova Провожу консультации в Москве и удалённо, пишу про психологию и коучинг. |
| Created | Between 1 April 2019 and 30 September 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/psy_martynova_anna |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Aug 2026, 08:31 | 55 | no change |
| 8 Aug 2026, 01:45 | 55 | first reading |
17 posts held, back to 22 May 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 17 (22 May 2025 – 6 August 2026) |
| Views total | 55 |
| Reactions total | 3 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 10 Aug 2026, 08:31 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 10 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
129 reactions across 17 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 45.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 59 | 45.7% | |
| 👍 | 30 | 23.3% | |
| 🔥 | 28 | 21.7% | |
| 😍 | 12 | 9.30% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 129reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 22 May 2025 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @psy_martynova_anna. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 17 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 22 May 2025 to 6 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Лето - повод вспомнить беззаботное время, когда мы в детстве наслаждались красками природы и давали себе простор для творчества и самовыражения Приглашаю вас провести время с мой замечательной сораницей по развитию психологической культуры Еленой Зубаревой Уже в следующую субботу 15 августа в Москве (парк Музеон) Детали в посте ниже
❤1
Собрать себя по частям Лето — идеальное время, чтобы собрать картину своей жизни по частям. В психологической практике есть техника «Коллаж», которая позволяет из отдельных фрагментов визуализировать целостный образ. Коллаж в психологической работе — это способ обойти умные объяснения. Вы просто смотрите на сотни не связанных между собой изображений, и рука сама тянется к тому, что вызывает отклик в теле. Вы не мо…
🔥2
Это я в субботу утром жду студентов на зачет Завершили курс Психология и эффективная коммуникация со студентами 1 курса магистратуры. Задание на зачет было подготовить короткое выступление по любой теме, которая относится к психолигии и /или эффективным коммуникациям. Мне всегда интересно, какие темы выберут студенты🧑🎓 Всего было 28 выступлений. Топ 3 темы (о чем говорили студенты чаще всего): 👉 Манипуляции. Как…
👍6❤3🔥3
Мое знакомство с ТА в образовании На выходных произошло мое знакомство с транзактным анализом в образовании на семинаре Кэт Корнтуэйт "Rewriting the narrative: creating the space for an alternative narrative in TA education". Мой профессиональный переход в сектор образования был больше эмоциональным, чем рациональным порывом. Сработал тот самый *дзыньк*, когда я узнала про открытие совершенно нового университета. …
❤7👍2🔥1
В этом году я в основном читала книги по транзактному анализу Учебную литературу воспринимаю исключительно через реальную книгу 📚 Иногда все же слушаю аудио книги: перед сном или когда чем-то занимаюсь по дому Какие ваш книжные итоги года? Делитесь в комментариях 👁🗨 Что выберите: живую книгу 📚 или аудио 🎶? Идея с книжными историями подсмотрена у Ларисы Степанель
❤6👍4🔥4
Вчера в уютной тёплой компании интегрировали опыт уходящего 2025 года Люблю экспериментировать с форматом ретроспективы. В этом году скрестила бизнесовые подходы с проективными методиками и терриями транзактного анализа. Посмотрели на наш год с позиции трех эго-состояний: Родитель, Взрослый, Ребёнок Написали историю про героя и даже увидели в это истории наброски своего жизненного сценария (одна из ключевых концепц…
😍4❤1👍1🔥1
Завтра (16 декабря) в 19:00 провожу ретроспективу года Приходите, чтобы в теплой камерной обстановке интегрировать опыт и впечатления от 2025 года Подробности участия в этом посте
❤1👍1🔥1
Подводим итоги, чтобы прийти к новым целям Предновогодняя рефлексия не должна стать дополнительным стрессом. Давайте не будем подводить итоги года в режиме «я не успел и не смог!», а сфокусируемся на новых стратегиях? В начале года мы загадывали желания, создавали планы, формулировали цели или просто надеялись на лучшее) И вот 12 месяцев позади. 16 декабря Анна Мартынова приглашает вас на мастер-класс «Ретроспекти…
❤5🔥3
Сегодня провела семинар магистрантам направления "Разработка" (она же "Программная инженерия") по теме командого взаимодействия Как всегда, большой отклик аудитории на тему конфликтов и их урегулирования Разбирали структуру конфликта, стратегии поведения в конфликте, а также как проходить стадию "бурления" при формировании команды, когда начинаются основные трения и столкновения А как вы относитесь к конфликтам? …
❤10🔥4👍3
На яндекс музыке нас тоже можно послушать https://music.yandex.ru/album/31217894?utm_medium=copy_link
❤5👍1🔥1
Время говорить о важном 🤍 Новый выпуск подкаста «Про вечные ценности» посвящен загадочной теме. Анна Мартынова и Елена Зубарева пригласили к разговору Алексея Пережогина — психоаналитика, супервизора, преподавателя психоанализа, автора книг «Я и моя тень», «Тревожиться нельзя управлять». Поговорили о понятии «Тень» – комплексе вытесненных, неприятных, постыдных качеств и сторон нашей души. В подкасте вы узнаете: …
❤3👍1🔥1
Время говорить о важном 🤍 В этом эпизоде подкаста «Про вечные ценности» Анна Мартынова и Елена Зубарева говорили про идентичность и разрыв шаблонов. Героиня встречи имидж-стратег Светлана Токарева считает, что гардероб — это не просто вещи, а отражение наших страхов, психологических блоков и скрытых посланий. Эта идея – основа ее программы «7️⃣шагов к дерзости». (Спойлер: тест перед началом программы покажет то, …
👍3😍3❤1
Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @psy_martynova_anna. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 887,033 of 1,570,450entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Что-то на психологическом” (@psy_martynova_anna), 55 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/psy_martynova_anna.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.