Channel
@pseudointellectualist
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
82subscribers
-2 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002439153864 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @pseudointellectualist |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 3 times, most recently 14 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/pseudointellectualist |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 30 Aug 2026, 06:08 | 82 | -1 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 15:47 | 83 | +1 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 14:46 | 82 | -2 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 17:18 | 84 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 10:02 | 84 | first reading |
15 posts held, back to 3 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 15 posts for this entry, the most recent from 8 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
9 reactions across 5 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 55.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5192696515486825324 | 5 | 55.6% | |
| custom 5273804541920299303 | 3 | 33.3% | |
| custom 5195024984761713183 | 1 | 11.1% |
Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 5 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 9 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 8 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Конец эпохи чтения Свежий The Atlantic пугает нас классическим томиком «Анны Карениной», который растворяется в кислотном цифровом глитче. В заглавной статье номера журналистка Роуз Хоровиц ставит безжалостный диагноз: конец эпохи чтения уже наступил. Мы привыкли верить, что всеобщая грамотность — это финал нашей эволюции и неизбежная константа. Но автор выдвигает отрезвляющий тезис: возможно, эпоха массового вдум…
Тоже красавчики!
Meta* оштрафовали на $567 млн за причинение вреда детям и подросткам — средства планируют направить на программы лечения и профилактики. Алгоритмы Facebook* и Instagram*, бесконечная лента и автоплей видео удерживали пользователей онлайн как можно дольше и, по версии суда, способствовали росту тревожности, депрессии и расстройств пищевого поведения. Meta* с решением не согласна и собирается его обжаловать. *принад…
#chillmeme
КАКИЕ ЖЕ КРАСАВЧИКИ!!!!!!
Вчера моя семилетняя дочка Николь играла со своей двоюродной сестрой Ульяной. Они сидели на подоконнике и собирали лего, каждая свой набор. И вот я вижу: Николь легко и шустро собрала свой. Неудивительно, это её регулярный досуг последние несколько лет. А Уля не могла собрать и плакала. Плакала так, будто это конец света. И что в этот момент делает Николь? Берёт своё собранное лего и делает для Ули вид, что оно у…
Photo, posted without a caption
Video, posted without a caption
Зритель не обязан разбираться в том, как устроена киноиндустрия. Он не знает, что решение о сдвиге премьеры принимается не режиссером фильма-конкурента, и не знает, что в трейлере может быть не финальная графика. Он и не должен этого знать. Он – точно такой же, как вы. Когда ломаются ваши жигули, вы тоже ругаете завод или автосервис, а не цепочку чьих-то решений. Что делать с проклятиями? Они ужасны. Закрывать комм…
Совершенно прекрасная «рандомная девушка в наушниках» как один из лучших образцов перепостмодернизма - внимательный (и возрастной) зритель уловит в этом адском межпоколенческом коктейле: - и вечеринку у Децла дома; - и «пепси, пейджер, MTV”; - и веяние группы «Кирпичи»; - и немножечко «Назад в будущее» Что ещё заметили, дорогие миллениалы?😁
Video message, posted without a caption
custom 52738045419202993032
у Колобка убрали рейтинг на Кинопоиске захвалили
custom 51926965154868253243
Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @pseudointellectualist. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 30 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Дайте Повыjobоваться” (@pseudointellectualist), 82 subscribers as measured 30 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/pseudointellectualist.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.