Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Выходит продюсер

@sonic_lee

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

4,489subscribers

-4 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001749606395
TypeChannel
Username@sonic_lee
Created13 March 2022measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live10 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 10 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/sonic_lee

Growth

4,4894,4934,4917 August 2026 — 4,493 subscribers7 August 2026 — 4,493 subscribers10 August 2026 — 4,489 subscribers7 August 202610 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 3 days, net -4. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 4,488–4,494 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Aug 2026, 13:184,489-4
7 Aug 2026, 11:234,493no change
7 Aug 2026, 08:484,493first reading

Engagement

13 posts held, back to 31 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 6 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
9.02%
avg views ÷ 4,489 subscribers
Avg views / post
405
13 posts measured
Reaction rate
4.49%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
13
of 13 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held13 (31 July 20267 August 2026)
Views total5,261
Reactions total236
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 18:02 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
1m 30s
Average length
30s

Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

236 reactions across 13 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 60.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
14260.2%
🔥4318.2%
😁208.47%
🤯114.66%
😱93.81%
👏72.97%
❤‍🔥20.847%
10.424%
🍓10.424%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 13 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 236reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 13 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 15:53 UTC219 views24 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

В принципе, день с отличной погодой и без особой работы можно было бы посчитать выходным🤔 Тем временем, мой «выходной»: - ОТПРАВИЛА 2 ДОГОВОРА КЛИЕНТАМ, ОДИН ПЕРЕСОГЛАСОВАЛА; - ЗАМЕТИЛА КОСЯК В ДОГОВОРЕННОСТЯХ, ПОДНЯЛА КЛИЕНТА НА УШИ, ПОПРАВИЛА; - ФОРМИРУЮ 2 ПРЕДЛОЖЕНИЯ НА ТЕНДЕР; - ВЕДУ СЛОЖНЕЙШИЙ ПРОЕКТ ПО ИИ’ШКЕ… А так что такого; «заведи свой бизнес», - говорили они; и у тебя совсем никогда больше не будет вых

17😁6🍓1

6 Aug 2026, 09:26 UTC326 views10 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @concertzaalPhoto

Новый 'Человек-паук' стал самым кассовым фильмом года — $1,1 млрд за неделю в мировом прокате, пишет Variety. Для сравнения: 'Одиссея' Нолана собрала $332 млн за первые 7 дней проката. @concertzaal

5🤯3👏2

6 Aug 2026, 09:16 UTC351 views10 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

Совершенно прекрасная «рандомная девушка в наушниках» как один из лучших образцов перепостмодернизма - внимательный (и возрастной) зритель уловит в этом адском межпоколенческом коктейле: - и вечеринку у Децла дома; - и «пепси, пейджер, MTV”; - и веяние группы «Кирпичи»; - и немножечко «Назад в будущее» Что ещё заметили, дорогие миллениалы?😁

5😁5

5 Aug 2026, 11:42 UTC391 views29 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Считаю, что на парочке проектов уже можно было бы сделать ТАК)

17😁9🔥3

4 Aug 2026, 14:50 UTC420 views21 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

Сегодня завершающий съемочный день большого проекта для ВК и автодрома Игора, который начался В МАЕ (!!!) - вручаем блогерам-победителям гонок их честно заработанные призы Помню, как я не верила в этот тендер, и нехило офигела, когда мы его всё же выиграли💫 Что ж, осталось доделать монтаж двух серий (из трех) – и буду делиться с вами результатами)

🔥147

4 Aug 2026, 12:44 UTC410 views7 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

6👏1

4 Aug 2026, 12:43 UTC400 views7 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Это - официальный комментарий бренда Щас я вам как юрист разложу, что здесь не так…

7

4 Aug 2026, 11:56 UTC551 views39 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Ekonika удалила посты с Рози Хантингтон-Уайтли. Я в шоке, если честно. Та боже ж мой, как можно быть такими злобными гоблинами, чтобы затравить бренд за (по большому счету) хорошо профессионально сделанную съемку селебрити мирового масштаба? Понятно, что подгорело всем, у кого нет 30К на туфли (но от того, что Рози снялась у Эконики, у этих людей и не появилось 30К и не убыло, так что ВОЗМОЖНО ДЕЛО НЕ В СЪЕМКЕ…) Е

20😱9🤯5🔥3👏2

3 Aug 2026, 17:01 UTC407 views13 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Смотрите-ка, мы задавались вопросом «а была ли предметка» - и теперь мы убедились, была. Вот она!

12🔥1

3 Aug 2026, 12:27 UTC432 views20 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @concertzaalPhoto

За контент без пометки 'создано ИИ' теперь грозит штраф до €150 млн или ₽1,52 млрд — в ЕС с 1 августа ИИ- фото, видео, аудио и некоторые тексты должны быть с маркировкой. Закон касается компаний, СМИ, блогеров и всех, кто использует нейронки в работе. @concertzaal

16🤯3🔥1

3 Aug 2026, 08:08 UTC431 views22 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Доброе утро и с первой рабочей неделей августа, dear all! Если вы (как и я) пока не сходили этим летом в полномасштабный отпуск, пока посмотрим хотя бы на обложку и fashion story португальского Vogue с отпускными вайбами✨

16🔥51

31 Jul 2026, 08:34 UTC462 views18 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

Ну и разумеется, куда же без видео) Интересно, параллельно снимали или последовательно🤔 Полагаю, гонорар у модели приличный и вероятно почасовой, то есть был смысл процессы параллелить…

10🔥6👏2

Showing the 12 most recent of 13 posts we hold for @sonic_lee. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 194,690 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Выходит продюсер” (@sonic_lee), 4,489 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/sonic_lee.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.