Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for ПИР на весь мир

Channel

ПИР на весь мир

@projectoram

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Advertising · Posts · Posts recorded as deleted · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

14,170subscribers

+140 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001251272098
TypeChannel
Username@projectoram
DescriptionКрупнейший канал для проектировщиков и изыскателей Регистрационный номер Роскомнадзора - 5084448579 Cотрудничество: @leaders_support Предложить новость или стать автором: @pir_pekar
Created3 July 2018 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 November 2026
Measurements held59
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/projectoram

Topic

Technology — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 67% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

14,02514,18214,103.56 August 2026 — 14,030 subscribers7 August 2026 — 14,029 subscribers8 August 2026 — 14,030 subscribers9 August 2026 — 14,029 subscribers10 August 2026 — 14,027 subscribers11 August 2026 — 14,032 subscribers12 August 2026 — 14,029 subscribers13 August 2026 — 14,035 subscribers14 August 2026 — 14,042 subscribers16 August 2026 — 14,034 subscribers17 August 2026 — 14,033 subscribers18 August 2026 — 14,032 subscribers19 August 2026 — 14,041 subscribers20 August 2026 — 14,036 subscribers22 August 2026 — 14,037 subscribers24 August 2026 — 14,038 subscribers25 August 2026 — 14,032 subscribers26 August 2026 — 14,027 subscribers27 August 2026 — 14,034 subscribers28 August 2026 — 14,040 subscribers29 August 2026 — 14,037 subscribers30 August 2026 — 14,036 subscribers31 August 2026 — 14,039 subscribers1 September 2026 — 14,033 subscribers2 September 2026 — 14,030 subscribers3 September 2026 — 14,033 subscribers5 September 2026 — 14,026 subscribers11 September 2026 — 14,030 subscribers13 September 2026 — 14,025 subscribers15 September 2026 — 14,029 subscribers17 September 2026 — 14,026 subscribers19 September 2026 — 14,033 subscribers26 September 2026 — 14,051 subscribers4 October 2026 — 14,090 subscribers9 October 2026 — 14,097 subscribers13 October 2026 — 14,110 subscribers14 October 2026 — 14,118 subscribers15 October 2026 — 14,119 subscribers16 October 2026 — 14,123 subscribers17 October 2026 — 14,119 subscribers18 October 2026 — 14,111 subscribers19 October 2026 — 14,125 subscribers20 October 2026 — 14,126 subscribers21 October 2026 — 14,129 subscribers22 October 2026 — 14,152 subscribers24 October 2026 — 14,155 subscribers25 October 2026 — 14,156 subscribers26 October 2026 — 14,158 subscribers27 October 2026 — 14,164 subscribers28 October 2026 — 14,167 subscribers30 October 2026 — 14,165 subscribers31 October 2026 — 14,168 subscribers2 November 2026 — 14,165 subscribers3 November 2026 — 14,174 subscribers4 November 2026 — 14,179 subscribers5 November 2026 — 14,178 subscribers6 November 2026 — 14,182 subscribers10 November 2026 — 14,179 subscribers13 November 2026 — 14,170 subscribers14,1706 August 202613 November 2026
59 measurements spanning 99 days, net +140. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 14,001–14,206 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 59
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Nov 2026, 09:5114,170-9
10 Nov 2026, 21:5514,179-3
6 Nov 2026, 17:5814,182+4
5 Nov 2026, 16:5614,178-1
4 Nov 2026, 15:2614,179+5
3 Nov 2026, 13:1814,174+9
2 Nov 2026, 12:5614,165-3
31 Oct 2026, 09:2614,168+3
30 Oct 2026, 08:2914,165-2
28 Oct 2026, 07:4614,167+3
27 Oct 2026, 10:4614,164+6
26 Oct 2026, 12:4914,158+2
25 Oct 2026, 10:1614,156+1
24 Oct 2026, 10:5614,155+3
22 Oct 2026, 13:3014,152+23
21 Oct 2026, 07:5614,129+3
20 Oct 2026, 04:3614,126+1
19 Oct 2026, 07:2114,125+14
18 Oct 2026, 08:5114,111-8
17 Oct 2026, 11:2914,119first reading

Engagement

74 posts held, back to 31 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 75 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
8.97%
avg views ÷ 14,170 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,270
25 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.853%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
25
of 74 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 13 November 2026
Posts held74 (31 July 2026 – 13 November 2026)
Views total31,782
Reactions total271
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken14 Nov 2026, 08:10 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈4,810
Videos
≈135
Links
≈2,360

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 14 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
7m 14s
Average length
1m 02s

Measured directly from 7 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

781 reactions across 71 posts, in 24 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 21.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
😁17121.9%
🔥16120.6%
👍14318.3%
❤13016.6%
🤝405.12%
🤣354.48%
❤‍🔥202.56%
🎉182.30%
👌151.92%
💯101.28%
👏60.768%
🙏60.768%
🥰50.64%
🦄40.512%
🗿30.384%
🤩30.384%
🏆20.256%
💔20.256%
😍20.256%
💊10.128%
4 further kinds40.512%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 72 of the 74 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 781 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 74 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 13 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 74 we hold a reading for · 1%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @projectoram. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 74 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 31 July 2026 to 13 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Advertising

Ad load
6.76%
5 of 74 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
5
posts carrying an erid · 4 distinct tokens
Median views · ads
1,320
over 5 measured posts
Median views · rest
1,260
over 69 measured posts

An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.

This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.

Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. They are printed side by side with the count behind each rather than as a ratio: an ad and an ordinary post are not otherwise matched — for topic, for length, for hour of day — so the gap between them is a description of two groups and not the effect of one being an ad.

Advertising tokens recorded on this entry
eridPostsFirst seenLast seen
2W5zFHuvUau24 August 202624 August 2026
2Vtzquiq4q811 August 20261 August 2026
2W5zFGNp5VL13 November 20263 November 2026
2W5zFHqWXAy111 August 202611 August 2026

A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.

Measured over the 74 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 13 November 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 1 of 25 posts held from the last 30 days (4.00%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

13 Nov 2026, 12:01 UTC726 views12 reactionsread 14 November 2026
Photo

НОПРИЗ утвердил новую форму выписки из ЕРЧ Совет НОПРИЗ утвердил новую форму выписки из Единого реестра членов (ЕРЧ). Теперь в ней указывается право организации на подготовку проектной и рабочей документации. Изменения связаны с Федеральным законом № 309-ФЗ. С 1 марта 2026 года разработка рабочей документации и внесение в неё изменений включены в перечень работ, для которых обязательно членство в СРО проектировщико…

😁6🔥4👍2

13 Nov 2026, 08:55 UTC748 views14 reactionsread 14 November 2026
Forwarded from @project_leadersVideo

Форум «Лидеры проектирования 2026» объявляется открытым 🎉 Павел Сёмочкин, президент клуба «Лидеры проектирования», создатель форума и премии, учредитель АО «Платформа Лидеры проектирования», сказал приветственное слово для участников: «Я бы хотел поразмышлять на тему лидерства: как мы его понимаем и почему это важно. В моём понимании лидер — это не тот, кто забрался выше всех и смотрит на всех свысока. По моему м…

🔥6❤4👌3👍1

13 Nov 2026, 08:55 UTC732 views5 reactionsread 14 November 2026

Прямой репортаж с форума «Лидеры проектирования 2026» в канале 🔥 Переходите в @project_leaders и следите за событиями в прямом эфире!

👍5

12 Nov 2026, 14:02 UTC≈1,230 views10 reactionsread 14 November 2026
Photo

Утвердили ГОСТ на проектирование подземных хранилищ газа Росстандарт утвердил ГОСТ 35399-2026 «Система газоснабжения. Магистральная трубопроводная транспортировка газа. Подземные хранилища газа в пористых пластах. Проектирование». Документ введён приказом Росстандарта от 1 сентября 2026 года № 1075-ст. Стандарт устанавливает требования к проектной документации на строительство и реконструкцию подземных хранилищ при…

😁5🤣4🔥1

11 Nov 2026, 11:08 UTC756 views4 reactionsread 14 November 2026
Forwarded from @project_leadersPhoto

🔥 Программа форума «Лидеры проектирования 2026» 13 ноября в Москве соберутся люди, от решений которых зависит будущее проектирования в России. В программе три большие сессии с руководителями крупнейших проектных компаний, заказчиками, девелоперами и производителями. В центре внимания — стратегии масштабирования бизнеса в условиях стагнации, экономика проектной компании в 2026 году и противостояние репутации и демпи…

❤4

11 Nov 2026, 06:05 UTC≈1,210 views3 reactionsread 14 November 2026

Часть 2. Расчёты и мероприятия 👇 8️⃣ Расчёт численности работников Проверьте исходную трудоёмкость, продолжительность работ, сменность и фонд рабочего времени. Если сначала использованы укрупнённые показатели, после получения сметных трудозатрат уточните расчёт и связанные потребности во временных зданиях и ресурсах. 9️⃣ Потребность в строительных машинах и механизмах Увяжите механизацию с объёмами и технологией …

🤝3

11 Nov 2026, 06:02 UTC≈1,150 views4 reactionsread 14 November 2026
Photo

Проверьте ПОС по 14 важным пунктам Часть 2/2 В первой части статьи Ирина Гладковская разобрала исходные данные для ПОС, а теперь мы сделаем обзор 14 пунктов для проверки. 1️⃣ Исходные данные для ПОС Проверьте наличие актуальных разделов проектной документации, изысканий, обследований, ведомостей объёмов работ, смет и подтверждённых сведений заказчика. Отдельно зафиксируйте, каких данных не хватает, кто их предоста…

🤝4

10 Nov 2026, 10:03 UTC≈1,050 views10 reactionsread 14 November 2026

Posted without readable text

👍5🔥3❤2

9 Nov 2026, 07:01 UTC≈1,630 views23 reactionsread 14 November 2026
Photo

Проектировщик, когда зажало между несколькими проектами 😁 Хорошей недели, коллеги! 💬 ПИР на весь мир в MAX

😁23

7 Nov 2026, 11:04 UTC≈1,530 views14 reactionsread 14 November 2026
Photo

Чёрный — цвет архитекторов? В европейской архитектурной среде чёрный цвет давно превратился в негласный дресс-код архитекторов. Немецкая архитектор и журналистка Кордула Рау даже посвятила этому феномену целую книгу: «Why Do Architects Wear Black?» («Почему архитекторы носят чёрное?»). Ирония в том, что сама Кордула нередко появляется именно в чёрном — и однажды, когда её спросили, в чём секрет популярности этого цв…

❤‍🔥8👍2💯2🤔1🤝1

6 Nov 2026, 14:10 UTC≈1,410 views21 reactionsread 14 November 2026
Video

Поднять щиты за проектировщиков 🛡️ 💬 ПИР на весь мир в MAX

😁18🗿3

6 Nov 2026, 12:31 UTC≈1,540 views5 reactionsread 14 November 2026

Posted without readable text

🔥2🤝2❤1

Showing the 12 most recent of 74 posts we hold for @projectoram. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts recorded as deleted after publishing

We recorded 1 post on @projectoram as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.

A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.

First seen missing
13 August 2026
Most recent seen missing
13 August 2026
Median time before seen missing
29 hours
Seen missing in the last 30 days
0

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 9 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Грязный проектировщик
@filthyarchitect · 20,225
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 28 September 2026
Проектирование зданий
@prozru · 44,657
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 28 August 2026
Просто о сметах
@smety · 21,838
Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 23 September 2026
Цифровое строительство
@digitalbuild · 23,901
Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 16 September 2026

This channel appears in 4 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“ПИР на весь мир” (@projectoram), 14,170 subscribers as measured 13 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/projectoram.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.