Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

О прочитанных книгах

@prochitannie

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Advertising · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

4,892subscribers

+8 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001850427320
TypeChannel
Username@prochitannie
DescriptionАдмин - Чингиз Патиев Анонимные вопросы: http://t.me/anonimnyye_voprosy_bot?start=rdT0Bn
Created2 January 2023measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live10 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 10 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/prochitannie

Growth

4,8844,8924,8887 August 2026 — 4,884 subscribers7 August 2026 — 4,884 subscribers8 August 2026 — 4,888 subscribers10 August 2026 — 4,892 subscribers7 August 202610 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 3 days, net +8. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 4,883–4,893 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Aug 2026, 19:514,892+4
8 Aug 2026, 02:014,888+4
7 Aug 2026, 13:034,884no change
7 Aug 2026, 12:494,884first reading

Engagement

26 posts held, back to 14 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 7 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
33.5%
avg views ÷ 4,892 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,640
24 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.14%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
24
of 26 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 23 of 24 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 August 2026
Posts held26 (14 July 202611 August 2026)
Views total39,374
Reactions total429
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Aug 2026, 05:08 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
1,220
Videos
68
Links
759

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Reaction mix

432 reactions across 23 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 63.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
27563.7%
👍6515.0%
💯4610.6%
🔥296.71%
🤝81.85%
💔40.926%
30.694%
20.463%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 25 of the 26 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 432reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 26 most recent posts we hold, published 14 July 2026 to 11 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
11
across the posts below
Posts paid on
8
of 26 we hold a reading for · 31%
Most on one post
2
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @prochitannie. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 26 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 14 July 2026 to 11 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Advertising

Ad load
3.85%
1 of 26 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
0
none — marked by hashtag only
Median views · ads
1,290
over 1 measured post
Median views · rest
1,740
over 25 measured posts

An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.

This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor.A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.

Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.

Measured over the 26 most recent posts we hold, published 14 July 2026 to 11 August 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.

Recent posts

11 Aug 2026, 19:25 UTC370 views3 reactionsread 12 August 2026

كتب الشيخ العلامة د. صالح الفوزان -مفتي عام المملكة العربية السعودية تصوير جديد https://t.me/Al_Fawzan_books

🔥3

11 Aug 2026, 15:59 UTC580 views19 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Быть может, вайбкодинг облегчит мне создание хотя бы приложения для этого дела Как думаете, возобновить работу? Речь об этом: https://t.me/prochitannie/3366

10🔥5👍4

11 Aug 2026, 07:16 UTC766 views2 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Никто не знает подобного приложения для iOS?

2

9 Aug 2026, 20:10 UTC898 views26 reactions1 Starread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @AlHanabilPhoto

Мутляк аль Джасир пишет: Несколько слов, сказанных от чистого сердца и содержащих полезное наставление, могут стать причиной великого дела, польза от которого достигнет самых далёких уголков. Вот один из таких примеров: Сахих аль-Бухари был составлен по совету имама Исхака ибн Рахавейха. Аль-Бухари говорит: Однажды я присутствовал на собрании Исхака ибн Рахавейха, и он сказал: “Кто из вас возьмётся собрать досто

26

8 Aug 2026, 12:29 UTC≈1,080 views8 reactions2 Starsread 12 August 2026
Photo

У издательства "Фаджр" в этом году много хороших новинок, ма ша АллахI Книга объемная, на 1000+ страниц

6👍2

7 Aug 2026, 23:57 UTC≈1,320 views14 reactions2 Starsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Это издательство, "Muslim", получило право от издательства "Ummah" напечатать эту книгу. Как видите, даже обложка та же самая. Внутрянка, я полагаю, тоже такая же, как и в старой версии. Это по той информации, что я имею АллахIу А'лям Можете теперь не тратить по 6-8 тысяч рублей на старую версию, ин ша АллахI)

13🔥1

7 Aug 2026, 20:34 UTC≈1,110 views25 reactions1 Starread 12 August 2026

Сказал имам Ахьмад, да помилует его АллахI: "Тот, кто намеренно оставляет молитву витр, является скверным человеком, и его свидетельство не должно быть принято"

20🤝5

6 Aug 2026, 17:03 UTC≈1,290 views7 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Advertisement

https://t.me/albadrmadina «Канал с уроками по шарху шейха 'АбдуРразакъа аль-Бадра, да сохранит его АллахI, на Акыду аль Васитыййа ибн Теймии, да помилует его Аллах. На канале 105 аудиозаписей. Уроки обновляются. #реклама

👍43

2 Aug 2026, 17:43 UTC≈1,570 views21 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @dar_ujourFile

Представляем вашему вниманию новинку от DAR UJOUR — послание «Четыре правила» имама Мухаммада ибн ‘АбдульВаххаба с разъяснением шейха Салиха аль-Люхайдана, да помилует их Аллах. Прошу Аллаха сделать это послание полезным для мусульман. DAR UJOUR

🔥7👍653

30 Jul 2026, 14:54 UTC≈2,050 views13 reactions2 Starsread 12 August 2026

Очень хорошая книга Советую купить

13

30 Jul 2026, 14:33 UTC≈1,600 views6 reactions1 Starread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @darutawheedPhoto

Книга Сунны, уже в продаже в магазинах: 📍Магазин «Хикма» — г. Махачкала 📍 Магазин «Сунна» — г. Хасавюрт 📍 Магазин «Anaasif» — г. Назрань

4🔥2

29 Jul 2026, 20:05 UTC≈1,520 views16 reactions1 Starread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @AlHanabilPhoto

Уникальность книг ибн Аби Дуньи аль Ханбали. Книга Мольбаы Ибн Аби ад-Дунья аль Ханбали ум.281 г.х. Прекрасное предание от Анаса ибн Малика да будет доволен им Аллах, которое не встречается с иснадом ни в какой другой книге, кроме этой. Исхак ибн Ибрахим сказал: Нам сообщил Абу Раджа аль-Кальби, от Язида ар-Ракаши, от Анаса ибн Малика да будет доволен им Аллах, что он сказал: Когда раб говорит: О Господь мой! О

12💔4

Showing the 12 most recent of 26 posts we hold for @prochitannie. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 308,513 of 1,183,361entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“О прочитанных книгах” (@prochitannie), 4,892 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/prochitannie.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.