Channel

Процессуальные чтения

@procedural_reading

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

451subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID	-1001764695323
Type	Channel
Username	@procedural_reading
Description	Гражданский процесс зарубежных стран. Иностранная литература и материалы. Некоммерческий проект, отражающий личное мнение автора канала. Все материалы размещаются исключительно для ознакомления в образовательных целях.
Created	Between 1 December 2021 and 31 March 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded	8 August 2026
Last confirmed live	8 August 2026
Measurements held	2
On Telegram	t.me/procedural_reading

Growth

2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 450–452 and does not start at zero.

Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)	Subscribers	Change
8 Aug 2026, 05:01	451	no change
8 Aug 2026, 03:15	451	first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 31 January 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 25 May 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos: 35
Videos: 1
Links: 61

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

224 reactions across 18 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 31.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction	Count	Share
👍	71	31.7%
🔥	63	28.1%
❤	46	20.5%
😁	13	5.80%
💯	8	3.57%
🙏	7	3.13%
🆒	4	1.79%
⚡	3	1.34%
🤗	3	1.34%
🤩	2	0.893%
✍	1	0.446%
🌚	1	0.446%
👎	1	0.446%
😢	1	0.446%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 224reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 31 January 2025 to 25 May 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

25 May 2026, 13:05 UTC267 views17 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Опубликование недавно принятого Постановления Пленума Верховного Суда РФ о подготовке гражданских дел к судебному разбирательству - это хороший повод вспомнить о некоторых работах о стадии подготовки дел за рубежом. Нам поможет в этом, конечно же, не только работа Олега Иванова, но и, например, сборник Current Trends in Preparatory Proceedings. A Comparative Study of Nordic and Former Communist Countries (L. Ervo, A…

❤9👍6🔥2

Signed Daniil Krymskiy

13 Apr 2026, 08:59 UTC≈1,060 views12 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Среди многочисленных зарубежных работ о КНР, которые публикуются в последнее время, недавно попалась книжка о роли прокуратуры Study on the System of Procuratorial Public Interest Litigation in China (Springer, 2026). Судя по всему, дискуссии об участии прокуратуры в судопроизводстве есть и там.

❤6🔥3🤩2😢1

Signed Daniil Krymskiy

17 Sept 2025, 09:36 UTC≈4,780 views21 reactionsread 8 August 2026

File

И вновь в фокусе внимания немецкий процесс. В этот раз в Унивеситете будет защищаться диссертация о ревизионном производстве. https://dissovet.msu.ru/dissertation/3546

❤8🔥7👍5💯1

Signed Daniil Krymskiy

7 Jul 2025, 11:12 UTC≈1,280 views12 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Для тех, кто интересуется общими вопросами сравнительного правоведения, может быть полезным недавно вышедшее в серии Springer Textbooks in Law второе издание книги Traversing Legal Traditions. Perspectives on Comparative Law and Legal History.

🔥6👍3❤2🌚1

Signed Daniil Krymskiy

18 May 2025, 09:29 UTC≈1,370 views20 reactionsread 8 August 2026

File

И поскольку речь сегодня зашла о Германии, сразу вспомнилась классическая работа А.Г. Давтян (монография 2000, а позже и диссертация в 2002), с которой в начале 2000х многие (и особенно те, кто не в достаточной степени владел иностранным языком), в том числе и я, начинали знакомство с немецким процессом. Сейчас скан этой книжки можно найти на просторах Интернета, но пусть будет и тут

👍13🔥6✍1

Signed Daniil Krymskiy

18 May 2025, 09:05 UTC≈1,350 views14 reactionsread 8 August 2026

File

В июне в МГУ имени М.В. Ломоносова будет защищищаться диссертация А.С. Дружининой "Судебное решение в гражданском процессе Германии". Новое научное исследование о немецкой теории продолжает традиции сравнительно-правовых исследований, выполненных на кафедре гражданского процесса.

👍12❤2

Signed Daniil Krymskiy

11 Apr 2025, 13:24 UTC≈1,000 views11 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Если серьезно, то сегодня для вас небольшая подборка иностранных статей 2025 г. о суде и судьях. Это: 📌 The Outer Limits of the Judicial Trial от чешского автора из сборника Exploring the Boundaries of Law (2025). В ней о пространственном и языковом "измерении" судебного процесса. Сразу вспоминается монография А.В. Аргунова "Пространство правосудия" (кто не читал, рекомендую). 📌 размышления о будущем от главы CEPE…

🔥9❤1👍1

Signed Daniil Krymskiy

11 Apr 2025, 12:11 UTC692 views9 reactionsread 8 August 2026

"Не получилось, не фартануло" (с) #пятничное Короткое видео с русскими субтитрами в первом комментарии под постом, а полное видео на англ - на сайте новости (по ссылке, не в превью): Judge Shuts Down Use of AI Avatar to Argue Case in Court https://uk.news.yahoo.com/judge-shuts-down-ai-avatar-100140351.html

🔥5😁4

Signed Daniil Krymskiy

4 Apr 2025, 10:32 UTC684 views10 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Любопытная новость попалась к этой тематике. Пишут, что суд в Аризоне пробует использовать сгенерированный аватар для пересказа решений для широкой публики. Вот подумалось, а какой бы аватар подошёл нашим судам?...

😁4⚡3🔥3

Signed Daniil Krymskiy

16 Mar 2025, 09:36 UTC842 views10 reactionsread 8 August 2026

File

Сегодня вашему вниманию предлагаю статью Nuances of general knowledge: a brief outline of cases involving well-known facts in actions for annulment before the general court of the EU. В ней автор размышляет об "общеизвестных фактах" для целей доказывания, основываясь на сделанном им обзоре практики Суда ЕС, в которой дается оценка таким фактам.

👍6🔥4

Signed Daniil Krymskiy

12 Mar 2025, 09:36 UTC827 views9 reactionsread 8 August 2026

File

И раз уж сегодня зашла речь о Германии, то предлагаю в этой связи посмотреть недавний небольшой обзор (статью) Making German courts more attractive for major commercial disputes. В нем обсуждается вступающее в силу с 1 апреля 2025 года законодательство, направленное на усиление "конкурентных позиций" Германии (учитывая ранее принятые аналогичные по своему содержанию изменения во Франции, Нидерландах, Швейцарии) как м…

👍6🆒2❤1

Signed Daniil Krymskiy

12 Mar 2025, 08:50 UTC626 views18 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Коллеги, Сергей Трушников в этом году планирует переводить, среди прочего, работу Франца Кляйна "Pro Futuro", а также ГПК Ганновера 1850 г. и множество других полезных материалов. Надо поддержать!

💯7🙏7👍4

Signed Daniil Krymskiy

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @procedural_reading. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 976,575 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Общество защиты левиафанов
@leviathan_gesellschaft · 6061 post

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Факультет права Вышки
@pravohse · 3,2351 post Shokobear (Олег Зайцев о банкротстве)
@Shokobear · 10,2211 post Судебная практика СКЭС ВС РФ
@vs_court · 55,6141 post

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Общество защиты левиафанов
@leviathan_gesellschaft · 6061 post

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

Перевод решений ВС ФРГ по гражданским делам
@bgh_zivil · 1,1391 post LegalTech
@Lgltech · 15,4591 post Судебная практика СКЭС ВС РФ
@vs_court · 55,6141 post

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Процессуальные чтения” (@procedural_reading), 451 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/procedural_reading.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.