Channel
@probigsales
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
464subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001910701192 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @probigsales |
| Description | Пишу про создание стратегий и использование ИИ. Полезно для топов и директоров по развитию/продажам в B2B. |
| Created | Between 1 March 2023 and 31 October 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 8 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/probigsales |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Aug 2026, 04:48 | 464 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 10:13 | 464 | first reading |
18 posts held, back to 27 November 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 19 January 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
30 reactions across 11 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 43.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 13 | 43.3% | |
| 🔥 | 5 | 16.7% | |
| 💯 | 4 | 13.3% | |
| ❤🔥 | 2 | 6.67% | |
| 🎉 | 2 | 6.67% | |
| 🥰 | 2 | 6.67% | |
| ❤ | 1 | 3.33% | |
| 🤝 | 1 | 3.33% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 30reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 27 November 2025 to 19 January 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Фокус ИИ в банках в 2026 смещается от «игрушечных» пилотов к промышленным агентным системам, которые реально режут косты, ускоряют принятие решений и закрывают регуляторные риски. Ниже подготовил топ 10 ключевых векторов развития, куда будут идти бюджеты и внимание топ‑менеджмента финансовых институтов. Каждый день буду выкладывать по 1 направлению развития. 1. Агентные ассистенты и автономные процессы Развертыва…
❤🔥1
С наступающим Новым 2026 годом!!!
🎉2🥰2
🎥 Запись вэбинара "Личная стратегия: как быть антихрупким в неопределённости?" В условиях неопределённости, скачущих доходов, давления со стороны рынка и выгорания привычные подходы к планированию не работают. Нужен инструмент, который выдерживает реальность, ошибки и изменения. Таким инструментом становится личная стратегия, построенная через метод «Карта гипотез». В этом видео разобрано: - почему без стратегии ч…
👍2
➡️СЕГОДНЯ 17.12 — 19:00 часов! Личная стратегия: как быть антихрупким в неопределённости? Пётр Костюков Ссылка здесь Бизнес — это продолжение стратегии владельца. Он как две капли воды похож на вас. Жизнь — это продолжение стратегии того, кто этой самой жизнью управляет, то есть тоже вас. Здесь про то, что такое личная стратегия, как ее создать самостоятельно и почему это важно сделать уже сегодня. Для всех, кто хо…
Сегодня в гостях у ScrumTrek.
👍2
Провал стратегии Microsoft в продаже AI-агентов: разбор несработавшей гипотезы Недавний отчет на сайте Ars Tecnica раскрыл серьезные проблемы Microsoft с продажами AI-продуктов, особенно платформы Azure Foundry и решений на базе агентов искусственного интеллекта. Компания была вынуждена снизить целевые показатели роста продаж вдвое после того, как менее 20% торговых представителей выполнили свои квоты в фискальном г…
🔥3👍1💯1
Про БОЛЬШИЕ продажи | Петр Костюков pinned a photo
Про БОЛЬШИЕ продажи | Петр Костюков pinned a photo
Друзья, для вашего удобства составили список активностей на декабрь и январь. Подробнее здесь - https://t.me/byndyufeed/764 Большинство компаний в 2026 году снова войдут в год без стратегии — зато с полной уверенностью, что стратегия у них есть. Но всё, что они называют стратегией, по-честному даже рядом с ней не лежит. Это нам показал год 2025. РАСПИСАНИЕ: ➡️17.12 — 19:00 Личная стратегия: как быть антихрупким в…
👍2❤🔥1💯1
Что должно быть в нашем продукте, чтобы вы были готовы платить в 2-3 раза больше? Какой результат мы должны давать своим клиентам?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
🔥 Вопрос на 100 баллов!!! Одна из частых ошибок, которые я вижу при работе с клиентами заключается в том, что сами сотрудники компании не всегда понимают, за что им платит клиент. Когда клиент платит деньги за "дрель", то это оплата не только за технические характеристики. А за возможность сделать "дырку" в стене. А если еще более глубоко капнуть, то за возможность "повесить картину" в своей квартире. И вот этот к…
👍2🔥1
Gartner: Что ждет B2B-продажи в ближайшие 5-10 лет Друзья, вышел свежий отчет Gartner по трансформации продаж, и он буквально взрывает мозг! Три технологии готовы перевернуть наш мир. 🤖 AI-агенты для продаж – на пике ожиданий Автономные AI-ассистенты уже не просто подсказывают, они сами планируют и выполняют задачи. Salesforce, Microsoft уже внедряют это у себя. До плато продуктивности – 2-5 лет. ❤️ Emotion AI – …
💯1🤝1
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @probigsales. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The 3 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Что должно быть в нашем продукте, чтобы вы были готовы платить в 2-3 раза больше? Какой результат мы должны давать своим клиентам?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Какая должна быть цель семейной стратегии?
The shares total 127%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Какие вопросы в семейной стратегии важны для Вас?
The shares total 180%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 27 November 2025 to 19 January 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank — 825,925 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Про БОЛЬШИЕ продажи | Петр Костюков” (@probigsales), 464 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/probigsales.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.