Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

ПрАпАлитику

@prapalitiku

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

882subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001117674612
TypeChannel
Username@prapalitiku
Created30 September 2017measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/prapalitiku

Growth

8826 Aug 2026, 02:45 — 882 subscribers6 Aug 2026, 14:22 — 882 subscribers6 Aug 2026, 02:456 Aug 2026, 14:22
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 881–883 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
6 Aug 2026, 14:22882no change
6 Aug 2026, 02:45882first reading

Engagement

15 posts held, back to 14 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
35.8%
avg views ÷ 882 subscribers
Avg views / post
316
13 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.33%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
13
of 15 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 11 of 13 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 August 2026
Posts held15 (14 July 20263 August 2026)
Views total4,105
Reactions total47
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken6 Aug 2026, 14:22 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
1,150
Videos
42
Links
2,330

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 6 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Reaction mix

47 reactions across 11 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 57.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🤣2757.4%
🔥817.0%
👍714.9%
💯36.38%
👏24.26%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 47reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 14 July 2026 to 3 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

3 Aug 2026, 18:23 UTC174 views6 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Если предположить, что "Шанхай Шеньхуа" это по-китайски ЛДПР, то "Ведомости" немного забегают вперед.

🤣6

30 Jul 2026, 15:02 UTC312 views1 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

#нампишут Короче, тексты ему пишет нейросеть Perplexity - буквально надысь читал я аналитику по типовым шаблонам и косякам нейросетей в текстах. Перплексити использует английскую риторику и, грубо говоря, сначала строит текст на английском, а потом переводит. Регулярно получается х..ня. "Это про" - калька с английского "it's all about", типичного для американских спичрайтеров в русской речи смотрится как смотрится 🤷

🔥1

29 Jul 2026, 07:27 UTC299 views5 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Вообще представляете, бывает такое, что люди по 25-30 лет в интернете и ни разу даже не были на сайте Онлифанс, потому что тупо не интересно. А бывают отдельные депутаты коронованные особы люди, которые трафик ГД раздувают до немыслимых гигабайтов и терабайтов, потому что никак не могут надро насмотреться на торжество всяческого аморализма, представляющего серьезнейшую опасность для нашей молодежи. Но, может быть, н

👍5

29 Jul 2026, 07:15 UTC258 views5 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Как всегда в подобных случаях, хочется сказать "Начните с себя"

🤣4👍1

28 Jul 2026, 14:19 UTC253 viewsread 6 August 2026

Очень интересный опрос. А мы завтра свой замутим.

28 Jul 2026, 10:36 UTC257 views2 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Красноярский край вошел в топ-10 регионов России по досрочному погашению кредитов Наконец-то хорошие новости.

🔥2

24 Jul 2026, 10:28 UTC372 views3 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Казалось бы, какая связь между сво и очередной пьяной ссорой возле ночного кабака? Но если ты в душе Мыкола, ты эту связь непременно найдешь: Это тот самый случай, когда живешь далеко от боевых действий, а возле дома все равно стреляют. Зря Соловьев по телевизору советуют людям из приграничных областей переезжать в Сибирь, тут у нас тоже небезопасно. Так вы не шляйтесь по ночам, Алексей. Глядишь, все и обойдется.

💯3

24 Jul 2026, 09:37 UTC328 viewsread 6 August 2026

«Силовой кулак» Часовитина сформирован с единственной целью — до октября выстроить внутренний защитный контур, провести тотальную ревизию сомнительных документов и юридически безупречно обосновать, почему выделенная по постановлению №320-п субсидия в размере 1,23 миллиарда рублей осталась неосвоенной. Годная конспирология! Наваристая! (интересно, почем)

24 Jul 2026, 02:58 UTC326 views2 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

В топ слов-мемов вошли следующие: Воздухан, Черемша, Пухосос, Плаксик. Будто об оппозиции краевой речь. Но, кто есть кто?

🤣2

22 Jul 2026, 02:15 UTC332 views4 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Почему интурист ни слова не сказал о черном небе? Он что, слепоглухонемой? И почему его еще не отменили в соцсетях? Где этот Перекотий, когда он так нужен?!

🤣4

18 Jul 2026, 01:51 UTC390 views3 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Смог от лесных пожаров в Канаде накрыл города Восточного побережья и севера США, включая Детройт, Чикаго, Нью-Йорк и Вашингтон. В Нью-Йорке индекс качества воздуха достигал "красного" и "фиолетового" уровней, которые считаются наиболее опасными. Из-за задымления в Филадельфии на час задержали бейсбольный матч, а встречу MLS между "Чикаго Файр" и "Ванкувер Уайткэпс" перенесли на октябрь. Под вопросом также оказался фи

🤣3

Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @prapalitiku. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,090,836 of 1,340,412entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“ПрАпАлитику” (@prapalitiku), 882 subscribers as measured 6 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/prapalitiku.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.