⚠️آیا خدا برای رزق و روزی انسان، تاس میاندازه؟ چرا بعضیها هر روز ثروتمندتر میشن و بعضیها با وجود تلاش زیاد، هنوز به درآمد دلخواهشون نمیرسن؟🤔 چون ثروت، شانسی نیست و قانون داره.✅ در دوره رایگان «قوانین الهی ثروت» با قوانینی آشنا میشی که نگاهت به رزق و ثروت رو برای همیشه تغییر میده.⭐ همین الان بزن روی لینک زیر و دوره رو شروع کن👇 @mahdikardan_servat @mahdikardan_servat @mahdikardan_servat

Channel
📗 PDF 📗
@ppdfff
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
25,365subscribers
-276 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001494731799 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @ppdfff |
| Description | ادمین تهیه دوره ها @miladsh1992 تبلیغات 👇👇 https://t.me/joinchat/THmc7dAKbfMX4kAO |
| Created | Between 1 April 2019 and 31 October 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 35 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 17 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/ppdfff |
Topic
Literature — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 69% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 17 Sept 2026, 13:37 | 25,365 | -22 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 15:38 | 25,387 | -7 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 02:00 | 25,394 | -9 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 09:17 | 25,403 | -9 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 06:38 | 25,412 | -17 |
| 7 Sept 2026, 00:00 | 25,429 | +8 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 06:16 | 25,421 | +2 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 20:05 | 25,419 | -3 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 20:05 | 25,422 | -3 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 18:55 | 25,425 | -9 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 21:45 | 25,434 | -6 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 21:25 | 25,440 | -17 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 20:24 | 25,457 | -4 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 22:38 | 25,461 | -3 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 01:12 | 25,464 | -5 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 01:54 | 25,469 | -7 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 04:35 | 25,476 | -15 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 04:04 | 25,491 | -12 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 10:26 | 25,503 | -13 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 02:02 | 25,516 | first reading |
Engagement
207 posts held, back to 1 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 73 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 2.24%
- avg views ÷ 25,365 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 568
- 52 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 52
- of 207 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 26 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 207 (1 August 2026 – 26 September 2026) |
| Views total | 29,510 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 26 Sept 2026, 22:53 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈5,450
- Videos
- ≈643
- Links
- ≈2
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 26 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
- Video runtime
- 56m 43s
- Average length
- 2m 28s
Measured directly from 23 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Recent posts
Sticker, posted without a caption
«تنبیه نکردن شر، معادل مجاز شمردن آن است.» - لئوناردو داوینچی
✒️ زندگی فینفسه نه خیر است، نه شر؛ بلکه عرصهی خیر و شر است بر اساس آنچه تو میسازیاش! 📚 اگزیستانسیالیسم چیست | سیمون دو بووار
✨نوستالژی✨ برقصیم شاد شاد شاد باشیم 💃🕺💃🕺💃🕺💃 🎼🎹🪗🎸🥁🪇🎹🎼
بفرست براش💙🍃👌 #پاییز🍁🍂🍁🍂🍁 .
صبح بخیر زندگی💐♥️ •🍃🌸🌞🌸🍃• ঊঈ💓ঊঈ
هر کتابی خواستید اینجا راحت دانلود کنید @bookk_lovers 📚 رایگانِ رایگان
Sticker, posted without a caption
بدترین کور،کوری بود که نمی خواست ببیند. #کوری📔 #ژوزه_ساراماگو✍
می دانی چه روزهایی را بی تو گذرانده ام. به خاطر این روزها از تو بدم می آید. می توانستیم با هم خوشبخت باشیم. #لیدی_ال📗 #رومن_گاری✍
پی دی اف کتاب "جاناتان مرغ دریایی" این کتاب ماجرای زندگی یک مرغ دریایی است که نمیخواهد مانند دیگران باشد و تلاش میکند تا در مسیر رسیدن به کاملترین وضعیت و ایدئالترین نسخه از خودش حرکت کند. #جاناتان_مرغ_دریایی📘 #ریچارد_باخ✍
Showing the 12 most recent of 207 posts we hold for @ppdfff. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
@bookk_lovers · 27,4624 posts𝐵𝑜𝑜𝑘
@Asheghanbook · 13,3372 postsنواژه
@Nava_zhe · 6452 postsChapter
@A_bookish · 4491 postاستاد عباسمنش
@abasmanesh_hosein · 7511 postBook 📖
@book_pdff · 23,3671 postکتابخانه
@BookTop · 361,2081 postبرایخورشید🌞
@brayekhorshid · 3521 postفرهنگ جاوید
@farhangejavid_pub · 1,4001 postهاشور//
@hashurr · 8,6111 postکتاب نایاب
@ketabnayyab · 89,4681 post@ketabfa
@ketsbfa · 1881 postLevel up channel
@levelupchannel1 · 9291 postمزدافر مؤمنی
@mazdafarr · 4,1301 post🌙راز تولد | چارت، مدیتیشن و متافیزیک
@Raztavalod · 4351 postبهرام رستمی | درآمد فوری
@rostami_marhalesaz · 1,0171 postبهرام رستمی | درآمد فوری
@rostami_ProsperityPath · 5461 post📚 دانشگاه زبان
@uniq_english · 5,5001 post
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
@bookk_lovers · 27,462#1
@kami_tafacor · 20,808#2
@mood_change · 30,587#3
@ravn100 · 16,184#4
@BookTop · 361,208#5
@abasmaannesh · 4,376#6
@kettabism · 33,751#7
@ketaab_sara · 4,756#8
@iideaaal · 391 (as read 14 September 2026)#9
@manzendeam2019 · 391#10
@ketabnayyab · 89,468#11
@secretofser · 205#12
@Herayooon · 2,532#13
@angizeshi75 · 120,895#14
@Ketabsel · 1,970#15
@Radio_prNdk · 444 (as read 14 September 2026)#16
@ebaratetakide · 15,367#17
@moovafaghiat2017 · 38,135#18
@j_angizeshi · 20,780#19
@Dar_Masire_Takamol · 600 (as read 14 September 2026)#20
@Monji313Mouod · 1,658#21
@ketabkhaneh2015 · 47,760#22
@delneeviiss · 1,356#23
@roman_bookk · 24,584#24
@contemporaryphilosophystation · 861 (as read 14 September 2026)#25
@Ketabestann_daron · 31,591#26
@InnerEchoessss · 828 (as read 14 September 2026)#27
@ketabdooni · 148,639#28
@StoryeKhas · 99,333#29
@ostad_eshg · 8,566#30
@VinDayer · 3,291#31
@Shahrzadtor · 901#32
@EBOOK_4U · 29,327#33
@jalaldehestani_Official_channel · 868#34
@book_pdff · 23,367#35
@khalgh_aani · 7,210#36
@Midanesti_d · 6,734#37
@astaghforellahsobhanallah · 9,821#38
@niroye_bartarr · 25,630#39
@LibraryinternationaL · 20,715#40
@mostandbaz · 2,624#41
@gadaboutmitsl · 2,434#42
@mosbatmozic · 530 (as read 14 September 2026)#43
@kafbinnasersalim · 264#44
@positivebeliefss · 2,668#45
@amooozesholoomvarzeshi · 377#46
@akhondane · 704#47
@ziremusic · 311 (as read 14 September 2026)#48
@bestteamnew · 1,579#49
@goldsharpedu · 332#50
@sampadibash1 · 3,030#51
@IRANinDENMARK · 1,176#52
@serfa_nnnnn · 1,270 (as read 14 September 2026)#53
@parvinzamany · 1,466#54
@KLAY_SIGNAL · 873#55
@badansaziazmon · 1,708#56
@kevintrudo1396 · 13,198#57
@dastane_shiraz · 1,318#58
@dr_sulmazabdi · 1,219#59
@AryaTehran · 1,234#60
@StrangerOnTheTrain · 1,176 (as read 14 September 2026)#61
@graph_yar · 2,398#62
@topDORE · 4,395#63
@drhekmati · 1,186#64
@seyedalifali · 2,057#65
@diabi · 2,053#66
@Tamino_Amir · 1,273#67
@Cinema_New_Wave · 25,994#68
@radiocharnal · 1,585#69
@UB_Farhangi · 1,983#70
@mhdwv · 1,925#71
@motion_picture_love · 8,925#72
@Vcl_ub · 1,881#73
@sadeghnejad · 416 (as read 14 September 2026)#74
@irrrealis · 678#75
@quiz_fr · 5,519#76
@doctorbarz · 3,367#77
@hastionistiii · 8,986#78
@gholabbafilili · 5,396#79
@njf_pnu · 884#80
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 14 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@bookk_lovers · 27,462
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 11 September 2026
@kami_tafacor · 20,808
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 25 September 2026
@Ketabestann_daron · 31,591
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 60 here — alongside 59 others — read 6 September 2026
@kettabism · 33,751
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 3 September 2026
@roman_bookk · 24,584
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 15 September 2026
@mood_change · 30,587
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 6 September 2026
@j_angizeshi · 20,780
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 26 September 2026
@ketabkhaneh2015 · 47,760
Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 26 August 2026
@book_pdff · 23,367
Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 18 September 2026
@ketab_iism · 44,301
Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 28 August 2026
@moovafaghiat2017 · 38,135
Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 31 August 2026
@niroye_bartarr · 25,630
Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 62 here — alongside 61 others — read 13 September 2026
@EBOOK_4U · 29,327
Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 9 September 2026
@dr_ghomsheii · 56,115
Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 23 August 2026
@StoryeKhas · 99,333
Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 15 August 2026
@BooksCom · 61,759
Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 21 August 2026
@tah_khiar · 38,990
Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 31 August 2026
@angizeshi75 · 120,895
Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 14 August 2026
@ketabnayyab · 89,468
Telegram ranks this channel #59 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 17 August 2026
@ketabdooni · 148,639
Telegram ranks this channel #65 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 12 August 2026
This channel appears in 20 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“📗 PDF 📗” (@ppdfff), 25,365 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ppdfff.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.