Channel
@astaghforellahsobhanallah
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
8,623subscribers
+116 since we began measuring on 15 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001623558056 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @astaghforellahsobhanallah |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 15 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 16 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/astaghforellahsobhanallah |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 16 Aug 2026, 05:07 | 8,623 | +116 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 00:31 | 8,507 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 8 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 15 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (8 August 2026 – 15 August 2026) |
| Views total | 45,122 |
| Reactions total | 1,330 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 15 Aug 2026, 00:31 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
1,330 reactions across 20 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 88.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 1,173 | 88.2% | |
| 🙏 | 45 | 3.38% | |
| 🤩 | 45 | 3.38% | |
| 👍 | 34 | 2.56% | |
| 🥰 | 10 | 0.752% | |
| 🤗 | 8 | 0.602% | |
| 🫡 | 8 | 0.602% | |
| 🎉 | 7 | 0.526% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,330reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 8 August 2026 to 15 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
خدایا آمرزش میطلبم از هر سخن ناحقی که بر زبان آوردم از هر حقی که ضایع کردم از هر باطلی که دنبالش رفتم از هر زمانی که آن را تباه کردم از هر کاری که توی الله راناخشنودساختم از هر رازی که فاش کردم از هر امانتی که به آن خیانت کردم از هر وعدهای که شکستم از هر عهدی که به آن وفا نکردم از هر انسانی که ناامیدش کردم از هر حقیقتی که پنهانش کردم از هر خطایی که بر زبان آوردم از هر آبرویی که خدشهدار کردم ذکر استغفرالله کفایت می…
❤2
جلسه دوم سلسله جلسات سلطنت سنت ها اردیبهشت ۱۴۰۵ مدرسه تعالی استاد امینی خواه 🪻🌸🍃🪻🌸🍃🪻🌸🍃 @astaghforellahsobhanallah
❤17🙏2👍1
Sticker, posted without a caption
❤7
این تجربه برای یک ماه پیش هست
❤36
#تجربه ارسالی اعضا سلااام دوستان عزیزم 🌹 من قرار بود تجربه ی حاجت روایی م را از استغفار بگم. ببخشید که دیر شد. می خواستم کامل بشه بعد بگم. یادتون هست یه کلیپ از استاد میرباقری فرستادم که توش ذکر 1000 مرتبه لا حول و لا قوة الا بالله و بعدش 1000 بار اَستَغفرالله و اسئله التوبه را برای حاجت روایی می گفت؟ من اولین بار حدود دو ماه پیش موقع شب این ذکر را گفتم. چند وقت بود خیلی به ارشد گرفتن فکر می کردم، و پشیمان بودم…
❤83🎉2
#تجربه ارسالی اعضا ❣سلام آبجی پروانه دوباره اومدم از حاجت روایی بگم🥰🥰😍 در عرض یک هفته از بین26هزار نفر استخدام شدم خب اصل کار رو میگم خدا وکیلی انجام بدین برای هر کاری نماز شب من فقط شفع و وتر خوندم و میخونم نماز اول وقت ذکر استغفار امام صادق با استغفار ساده هر تعداد که میتونی دو سه بند تا ده بند استغفار امام علی ترک گناه ترک گناه ترک گناه چه عملی چ فکری هروقت اومد سراغتون استغفار بگید بعد هم شکر گزاری من بع…
❤174👍20🤗5🤩5
Sticker, posted without a caption
❤19
#تجربه ارسالی اعضا ❣سلام من حاجتی داشتم اونم ازدواج بود برام جور نمیشد سنمم بالا رفته بود بالای ۳۰ سال بودم کلا ناامید شده بودم تا اینکه با استغفار اشنا شدم به مدت تقریبا دوسال استغفار گفتم بعد چندماه استغفار در سحر رو شروع کردم قبل از نماز صبح بیدار میشدم استغفار میگفتم و اینکه استغفار امام صادق هم در کنار استغفار ساده میگفتم تا اینکه خدا حاجتی که ازش ناامیدشده بودم رو بهم داد و من با فرد مناسب که همسن و هم کفو بند…
❤130🥰10🤩6
Sticker, posted without a caption
❤18
http://t.me/HidenChat_Bot?start=1720370828 لطفا اگر از مطالب کانال استفاده کردید تجربه تون رو از طریق لینک ناشناس یا دایرکت برامون بنویسید تا بقیه هم استفاده کنند این دِینی هست که به گردن کسانی که استفاده کردن و تجربه دیدند هست
❤10
❣فایل استغفار سی بند پیام داده بودید فایل قبلی استغفار سی بند خرابه این رو سیو کنید👆 🌸🍃🌸🍃🌸🍃🌸🍃🌸🍃🌸 @astaghforellahsobhanallah
❤39🙏4
Sticker, posted without a caption
❤14
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @astaghforellahsobhanallah. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“پاکسازی با استغفار وشکرگزاری” (@astaghforellahsobhanallah), 8,623 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/astaghforellahsobhanallah.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.