Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 8 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 51% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
10 measurements spanning 9 days, net -6,636. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 743,804–752,430 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
14 Aug 2026, 20:47
744,799
-913
13 Aug 2026, 11:48
745,712
-651
12 Aug 2026, 10:15
746,363
-653
11 Aug 2026, 13:34
747,016
-814
10 Aug 2026, 14:53
747,830
-560
9 Aug 2026, 18:12
748,390
-957
8 Aug 2026, 14:41
749,347
-637
7 Aug 2026, 13:32
749,984
-1,015
6 Aug 2026, 14:42
750,999
-436
6 Aug 2026, 00:41
751,435
first reading
Engagement
23 posts held, back to 12 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 21 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
8.96%
avg views ÷ 744,799 subscribers
Avg views / post
66,700
10 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.28%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
10
of 23 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 10 August 2026
Posts held
23 (12 June 2026 – 10 August 2026)
Views total
667,000
Reactions total
8,548
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
14 Aug 2026, 18:09 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
View velocity
How fast this channel’s own posts pick up views, from re-reading them repeatedly in the hours and days after they were published rather than the single reading most entries on this register get. Coverage is early and only a small minority of channels hold it at all — a gap in this section means the post has not been re-read again yet, not that nothing happened.
2 most recently posted, with a view-velocity reading
2.3 hoursupper bound — already past half at first reading · provisional — final view count still climbing
Curve is every standard checkpoint we hold a reading for (+1h, +3h, +6h, +12h, +24h, +48h, +7d after posting) — measured where a real reading landed close enough to that age, interpolated where it did not but readings on both sides let one be worked out between them. Nothing is ever extrapolated past the last real reading. Latest reading is the newest view and reaction count we hold for the post, side by side, so a gap between how views and reactions moved is visible without following it into the Observations section above. 24h reach is that one checkpoint on its own, labelled the same way. Half of last-observed viewsis the age at which a post’s view count crossed half of the highest figure we have read for it so far — an upper bound when the very first reading was already past half (we cannot see the actual crossing), and biased low while the post is still climbing, since “half of final” is dividing by a number that has not finished growing yet. Both caveats are printed inline wherever they apply, never silently dropped.
Reaction mix
19,027 reactions across 22 posts, in 1 kind.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
19,027
100.0%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 23 of the 23 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 19,944reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 23 most recent posts we hold, published 12 June 2026 to 10 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
139
across the posts below
Posts paid on
22
of 23 we hold a reading for · 96%
Most on one post
15
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @portals_community. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 23 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 12 June 2026 to 10 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Telegram Birthday Tournament ❤️
Special event is live across all Portals Games and the Marketplace
Fight bosses together — every game you play, every gift you buy or sell, and every Lucky Buy deals damage
Invite friends and grow the shared prize pool up to 20,000 GRAM
How it works:
— Every GRAM you spend deals damage to the bosses and earns you HP on the leaderboard
— HP per action varies — see the full breakdo…
Fine Pen on Portals 🎁
New collection just dropped and is now open for trading
For a limited time, Fine Pens are valued x2.5 in Gifts Staking
It means a gift worth 200 GRAM counts as 500 GRAM in your stake
Deposit yours now to enjoy 2.5x the rewards for the same gift
Upgrade Your Fine Pen 🎁
Buy Stars at the best rate on Portals and use them for new Gifts upgrades
Pay instantly with GRAM or via fiat and local payment systems
Re-activate Gifts Staking ❤️
Monday is the time to re-activate Gifts Staking to get in for next week
The current requirements to unlock more staking capacity:
— Deposit a new gift → +50 GRAM
— Play Portals Arena with a bet of 1 GRAM or more → +50 GRAM
— Every purchase of 500 Stars or more via fiat → +100 GRAM
For a limited time, Durov's Glasses are valued with an extra bonus
Durov's Glasses on Portals 🎁
New collection just dropped and is now open for trading
For a limited time, Durov's Glasses are valued x5 in Gifts Staking
It means a gift worth 200 GRAM counts as 1,000 GRAM in your stake
Deposit yours now to enjoy 5x the rewards for the same gift
Upgrade Your Durov's Glasses 🎁
Buy Stars at the best rate on Portals and use them for new Gifts upgrades
Pay instantly with GRAM or via fiat and local payment systems
Odyssey Tournament ❤️
New special tournament is live across all Portals Games
Fight bosses together, unlock more rewards with every kill, and grow the shared prize pool
How it works:
— Every GRAM you bet deals damage to the bosses and earns you HP in the leaderboard
— HP per mode varies — see the full list in the tournament info tab
— The prize pool splits proportionally to each player's total damage dealt
— T…
Gifts Staking Update ❤️
We’re expanding Gifts Staking with new ways to grow your rewards
The newest requirement to unlock more staking capacity:
— Every purchase of 500 Stars or more via fiat → +100 GRAM
Re-activate now in the Staking section and enjoy higher rewards
World Cup Tournament ❤️
Team Arena goes World Cup — instead of colors, pick your side: Spain or Argentina
100 prize places, including a Heart Locket 🎁 and Durov's Cap 🎁
Plus, an extra 1,000 GRAM airdropped among the winning team's players
How scoring works:
— You get 1 TON on the Leaderboard for every 1 TON won. Only net winnings count
— You also get 1 TON for every lost round where you bet 1+ TON
— Only Team …
Portex Is #1 on Telegram ❤️
Just three weeks after launch, Portex is the biggest prediction markets platform on Telegram by volume
Deposit from Portals and trade football, politics, crypto and more
Commission Update ❤️
We are bringing back a 2% commission — a change happening across every Gifts marketplace
We continue to improve Portals for our users, and this helps us keep shipping new activities and features
❤930
Showing the 12 most recent of 23 posts we hold for @portals_community. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 17,875 of 1,350,102entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 18 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Portals Community” (@portals_community), 744,799 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/portals_community.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
