Пополнение в семью

Channel
Lucha thoughts
@luchathoughts
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
11,114subscribers
-63 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002719537503 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @luchathoughts |
| Created | Between 1 June 2025 and 31 August 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 12 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 17 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/luchathoughts |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 17 Aug 2026, 10:54 | 11,114 | -14 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 18:44 | 11,128 | +58 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 06:15 | 11,070 | -17 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 19:26 | 11,087 | -20 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 20:31 | 11,107 | -16 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 22:39 | 11,123 | -11 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 22:22 | 11,134 | -5 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 20:16 | 11,139 | -10 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 17:21 | 11,149 | -16 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 17:00 | 11,165 | -12 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 02:36 | 11,177 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 00:48 | 11,177 | first reading |
Engagement
28 posts held, back to 11 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 18 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 49.9%
- avg views ÷ 11,114 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 5,550
- 22 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 22
- of 28 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 14 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 28 (11 July 2026 – 14 August 2026) |
| Views total | 122,100 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 15 Aug 2026, 16:34 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 22s
- Average length
- 22s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Recent posts
Как говорится сам не похвалишь, ни кто не похвалит
EWC Trading Challenge ❤️ August 12, 10:00 UTC — 32 CS2 rosters in 4 groups open the Esports World Cup in Paris Most people will just watch. You'll have money on the line Every $50 you trade on EWC markets prints a ticket to the $5,000 draw — and tickets stack fast: — Call the bracket in Pick'Em across all 4 stages: +10 tickets per hit — Clear missions: 13 ways to farm extra tickets — Top-3 splits $1,800, places…
Второй пошел.
В @portals турнир. Заходи смотри.
Не добавить не убавить.
Photo, posted without a caption
Удачный тест
Теперь можно лутать фри деньги получается😅 Скоро новые апдейты. @portex
Изи получается
Will there be no change in Fed interest rates after the July 2026 meeting? 💰 Position: YES 📈 PnL: +25.94% 🪙 Entry 79¢ → 100¢ 💵 Invest $83.2K → To win $105K 👀 Think you can do better?
Изменят ставку?
- Да31%
- Нет30%
- Не слежу39%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Showing the 12 most recent of 28 posts we hold for @luchathoughts. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Изменят ставку?
- Да31%
- Нет30%
- Не слежу39%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 28 most recent posts we hold, published 11 July 2026 to 14 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 31,651 of 1,481,502entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
@buy_toncoin_now_thank_me_later · 11 postProject Gem 💎
@giftgtop · 3811 postheekeNFT
@heekeNFT · 1191 postmake_portals_great_again
@make_portals_great_again · 11 post我的博客
@michaelgiftblog · 11,0441 postSenpai Shitpost
@s33npai · 3401 postSolo GIFT
@SOLO_GIFT · 1241 postStellar Chaos
@Stellar_Caos · 1351 postСтенка
@stenkakavkaza · 301 postTONNER NFT
@tonnernft · 5831 post
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 20 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
@GiftMeFive · 6,1263 postsArchitecton Wallet MEDIA ARC🦄
@architecton_tech · 2,191,6051 postGiftopedia
@Clgft · 2551 postGifts in Telegram
@Crypto_Investor999 · 401 post𝗰𝗿𝘆𝗽𝘁𝗼𝘁𝗶𝗯𝗹𝗲𝘀
@cryptotibles · 2,5291 post𝑮𝒂𝒗𝒊𝒓𝒂 𝑪𝒉𝒂𝒏𝒏𝒆𝒍
@GaviraChannel · 101 postКарлс - Раздачи НФТ подарков
@giftcarlson · 491 postJuIci NFT |💊|
@juici_nft · 4531 postJust SteLLaR
@JustSteLLaRR · 1,1701 postLemongrass TON
@lemongrasston · 1141 postMajor🌪
@lux_major · 101 postNFT Challenges 🐸
@NFT_Challenges · 591 postNFTочка
@NFTochka · 4731 postnikola’s gifts
@nikolasclub · 9761 postPlatinum Ticket 💸
@Platinum_Ticket_Group · 1171 postStars WORLD 🗺️
@PlushPepe_farm · 411 postRoxman
@roxman · 7,752,2171 postTG Gift News
@tg_g_giftnews · 9881 postThe Open Awards
@TheOpenAwards · 1,3351 postTrueCrypto Blog
@truedad_crypto · 3,2581 post
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Lucha thoughts” (@luchathoughts), 11,114 subscribers as measured 17 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/luchathoughts.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.