Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Lucha thoughts

Channel

Lucha thoughts

@luchathoughts

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

11,114subscribers

-63 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002719537503
TypeChannel
Username@luchathoughts
CreatedBetween 1 June 2025 and 31 August 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live17 August 2026
Measurements held12
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 17 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/luchathoughts

Growth

11,07011,17711,123.56 August 2026 — 11,177 subscribers6 August 2026 — 11,177 subscribers6 August 2026 — 11,165 subscribers7 August 2026 — 11,149 subscribers8 August 2026 — 11,139 subscribers9 August 2026 — 11,134 subscribers10 August 2026 — 11,123 subscribers11 August 2026 — 11,107 subscribers12 August 2026 — 11,087 subscribers14 August 2026 — 11,070 subscribers15 August 2026 — 11,128 subscribers17 August 2026 — 11,114 subscribers11,1146 August 202617 August 2026
12 measurements spanning 11 days, net -63. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 11,054–11,193 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
17 Aug 2026, 10:5411,114-14
15 Aug 2026, 18:4411,128+58
14 Aug 2026, 06:1511,070-17
12 Aug 2026, 19:2611,087-20
11 Aug 2026, 20:3111,107-16
10 Aug 2026, 22:3911,123-11
9 Aug 2026, 22:2211,134-5
8 Aug 2026, 20:1611,139-10
7 Aug 2026, 17:2111,149-16
6 Aug 2026, 17:0011,165-12
6 Aug 2026, 02:3611,177no change
6 Aug 2026, 00:4811,177first reading

Engagement

28 posts held, back to 11 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 18 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
49.9%
avg views ÷ 11,114 subscribers
Avg views / post
5,550
22 posts measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
22
of 28 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 14 August 2026
Posts held28 (11 July 202614 August 2026)
Views total122,100
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken15 Aug 2026, 16:34 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
22s
Average length
22s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Recent posts

11 Aug 2026, 23:45 UTC≈4,950 viewsread 15 August 2026
Photo

Как говорится сам не похвалишь, ни кто не похвалит

11 Aug 2026, 17:26 UTC≈4,440 viewsread 15 August 2026
Forwarded from @portex_communityPhoto

EWC Trading Challenge ❤️ August 12, 10:00 UTC — 32 CS2 rosters in 4 groups open the Esports World Cup in Paris Most people will just watch. You'll have money on the line Every $50 you trade on EWC markets prints a ticket to the $5,000 draw — and tickets stack fast: — Call the bracket in Pick'Em across all 4 stages: +10 tickets per hit — Clear missions: 13 ways to farm extra tickets — Top-3 splits $1,800, places

5 Aug 2026, 17:20 UTC≈5,190 viewsread 15 August 2026
Photo

Теперь можно лутать фри деньги получается😅 Скоро новые апдейты. @portex

29 Jul 2026, 18:39 UTC≈6,610 viewsread 15 August 2026
Photo

Will there be no change in Fed interest rates after the July 2026 meeting? 💰 Position: YES 📈 PnL: +25.94% 🪙 Entry 79¢ → 100¢ 💵 Invest $83.2K → To win $105K 👀 Think you can do better?

28 Jul 2026, 19:32 UTC≈5,830 viewsread 15 August 2026
Poll

Изменят ставку?

  1. Да31%
  2. Нет30%
  3. Не слежу39%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Showing the 12 most recent of 28 posts we hold for @luchathoughts. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

28 Jul 2026, 19:32 UTCAnonymous Poll561 voters

Изменят ставку?

  1. Да31%
  2. Нет30%
  3. Не слежу39%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 28 most recent posts we hold, published 11 July 2026 to 14 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 31,651 of 1,481,502entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 20 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Lucha thoughts” (@luchathoughts), 11,114 subscribers as measured 17 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/luchathoughts.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.