Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for The end.

Channel

The end.

@fory7o

On this record: Topic · Observations · Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

79,231subscribers

-3,280 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001551269621
TypeChannel
Username@fory7o
Descriptionв черном списке нет чужих,там свои же,забытые. По рекламе: @stepnricci @dooorass
CreatedBetween 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live25 September 2026
Measurements held34
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 25 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/fory7o

Topic

Personal blog — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 84% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Content that also appears on other registered channels

Posts published here appear word for word on 4 other registered channels. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.

Matching posts — open both and compare (6 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Posted firstThenOverlapGap
@fory7o/12611 · this entry2 Aug 2026, 16:00 UTC@mnnlovver/78402 Aug 2026, 16:04 UTC1.004 minutes
@fory7o/12612 · this entry2 Aug 2026, 19:01 UTC@mnnlovver/78412 Aug 2026, 19:02 UTC1.0072 seconds
@fory7o/12628 · this entry4 Aug 2026, 19:00 UTC@mnnlovver/78574 Aug 2026, 19:03 UTC1.002 minutes
@mnnlovver/78585 Aug 2026, 07:51 UTC@fory7o/12629 · this entry5 Aug 2026, 07:51 UTC1.00under a minute
@mnnlovver/78626 Aug 2026, 08:23 UTC@fory7o/12633 · this entry6 Aug 2026, 08:23 UTC1.00under a minute
@fory7o/12636 · this entry6 Aug 2026, 19:02 UTC@mnnlovver/78656 Aug 2026, 19:02 UTC1.00under a minute
Every channel this entry shares post bodies with
ChannelMatching postsText overlapTypical gapPublished first
@mnnlovver10 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.00under a minutethis entry (8–2)
@homellsen10 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.00under a minutethis entry (6–4)
@zabyttebia10 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.00under a minuteeven
@vseonas9910 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.0072 secondsthis entry (6–4)

Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.

What this cannot establish

MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.

Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. 9 of the 15 matches recorded here fall after that date and carried no header when we read them. The rest predate reliable capture and are not evidence either way.

“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 12 comparable posts for this entry, running 2 August 2026 to 7 August 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.

The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.

  • Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
  • 'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
  • shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
  • Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).

Across the whole group of 5, the earliest publisher we hold is @zabyttebia. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.

Recorded under the keys clone_mutual · clone_source, last confirmed 8 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Also posting the same content

This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 4 other registered channels, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.

Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.

Growth

79,23182,51180,8717 August 2026 — 82,511 subscribers7 August 2026 — 82,511 subscribers8 August 2026 — 82,495 subscribers9 August 2026 — 82,459 subscribers10 August 2026 — 82,437 subscribers11 August 2026 — 82,351 subscribers12 August 2026 — 82,264 subscribers13 August 2026 — 82,271 subscribers15 August 2026 — 82,248 subscribers16 August 2026 — 82,197 subscribers17 August 2026 — 82,153 subscribers18 August 2026 — 82,135 subscribers19 August 2026 — 82,119 subscribers20 August 2026 — 82,073 subscribers21 August 2026 — 81,950 subscribers23 August 2026 — 81,806 subscribers24 August 2026 — 81,746 subscribers25 August 2026 — 81,748 subscribers26 August 2026 — 81,713 subscribers27 August 2026 — 81,663 subscribers28 August 2026 — 81,606 subscribers29 August 2026 — 81,532 subscribers30 August 2026 — 81,452 subscribers31 August 2026 — 81,268 subscribers1 September 2026 — 81,161 subscribers3 September 2026 — 81,066 subscribers5 September 2026 — 80,927 subscribers8 September 2026 — 80,669 subscribers11 September 2026 — 80,425 subscribers13 September 2026 — 80,268 subscribers14 September 2026 — 80,119 subscribers16 September 2026 — 79,966 subscribers18 September 2026 — 79,774 subscribers25 September 2026 — 79,231 subscribers7 August 202625 September 2026
34 measurements spanning 49 days, net -3,280. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 78,739–83,003 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 34
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
25 Sept 2026, 07:5779,231-543
18 Sept 2026, 20:5779,774-192
16 Sept 2026, 10:2179,966-153
14 Sept 2026, 17:4180,119-149
13 Sept 2026, 07:0080,268-157
11 Sept 2026, 06:1680,425-244
8 Sept 2026, 07:3680,669-258
5 Sept 2026, 02:2280,927-139
3 Sept 2026, 08:3981,066-95
1 Sept 2026, 23:0881,161-107
31 Aug 2026, 21:5681,268-184
30 Aug 2026, 18:3581,452-80
29 Aug 2026, 20:5881,532-74
28 Aug 2026, 21:5881,606-57
27 Aug 2026, 23:1281,663-50
26 Aug 2026, 23:5581,713-35
25 Aug 2026, 22:4581,748+2
24 Aug 2026, 23:4481,746-60
23 Aug 2026, 13:4881,806-144
21 Aug 2026, 23:4781,950first reading

Engagement

171 posts held, back to 2 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 121 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
10.8%
avg views ÷ 79,231 subscribers
Avg views / post
8,540
67 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.96%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
67
of 171 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 26 September 2026
Posts held171 (2 August 2026 – 26 September 2026)
Views total571,900
Reactions total16,928
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken26 Sept 2026, 17:57 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
712
Videos
47
Links
195

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 26 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

42,600 reactions across 171 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 70.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤29,91770.2%
💔12,68329.8%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 171 of the 171 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 42,600 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 171 most recent posts we hold, published 2 August 2026 to 26 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
64
across the posts below
Posts paid on
37
of 171 we hold a reading for · 22%
Most on one post
11
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @fory7o. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 171 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 2 August 2026 to 26 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

26 Sept 2026, 16:45 UTC≈1,320 views112 reactionsread 26 September 2026

возможно кому-то нравятся активные парни в компаниях,но парни,которые ведут себя серьёзно и холодно по отношению ко всем,кроме тебя,не подписаны на 1000 девушек,«за ним,как за каменной стеной,чувствуешь себя в безопасности»,воспитанны и сдержанны,несмотря на свою уверенность в себе,всегда будут в моём вкусе

❤94💔18

26 Sept 2026, 14:08 UTC≈2,100 views1 reactionsread 26 September 2026
Photo

СЕГОДНЯ СТАВЛЮ НА МАТЧ: 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 АНГЛИЯ - ИСПАНИЯ 🇪🇸 ПОСМОТРЕТЬ ВИДЕО ПРОГНОЗ БЕСПЛАТНО👇 https://t.me/+4FVKXfSkXdYyZmJi

❤1

24 Sept 2026, 19:03 UTC≈6,240 views302 reactionsread 26 September 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

❤224💔78

24 Sept 2026, 16:04 UTC≈6,720 views273 reactionsread 26 September 2026

не спрашивайте, кто мой любимый исполнитель, лучше меня в этом мире никто нe исполняет

❤227💔46

23 Sept 2026, 19:05 UTC≈6,860 views323 reactionsread 26 September 2026

когда он жалуется на твой характер, но ты буквально его женская версия))

❤267💔56

23 Sept 2026, 16:03 UTC≈6,870 views252 reactionsread 26 September 2026
Photo

второй вариант лучше

❤200💔52

23 Sept 2026, 11:20 UTC≈6,950 views370 reactionsread 26 September 2026

придет время, и ты спокойно сможешь удалить переписку с тем, кто когда-то был тебе так сильно дорог.

❤261💔109

22 Sept 2026, 19:00 UTC≈8,180 views445 reactions5 Starsread 26 September 2026

молюсь за женщину, которой я стану через 5+ лет. надеюсь, она счастлива, любима, живет без извинений и делает то, что любит.

💔243❤202

22 Sept 2026, 18:00 UTC≈7,020 views8 reactionsread 26 September 2026
Video

💎 250 спинов ПРОСТО ЗА ВХОД! Никакого депозита. Нажимаешь Играть — получаешь 250 FS на любимые игры.

❤8

22 Sept 2026, 08:38 UTC≈6,750 views8 reactionsread 26 September 2026
Photo

VPN С ОБХОДОМ БЕЛЫХ СПИСКОВ И ГЛУШИЛОК 🛜 В твоем регионе глушат мобильную сеть и всё перестало работать? Вот гайд на обход: 1️⃣ Переходим в бота: @AtlantaVPN_bot 2️⃣ Получаем БЕСПЛАТНЫЙ ключ за подписку на тгк 3️⃣ Подключаем ключ в Happ / INCY 5️⃣ Тестируем сервера Ловит даже в стратосфере. 👋 Подключить бесплатно сейчас: @AtlantaVPN

❤8

21 Sept 2026, 19:01 UTC≈6,810 views264 reactionsread 26 September 2026

она появилась в моей жизни, чтобы показать мне, как выглядит самый прекрасный вид головной боли.

❤204💔60

Showing the 12 most recent of 171 posts we hold for @fory7o. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one

Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.

в заложниках чувств.
@foru7o · 29,799
#1
ab.soull
@absoulluve · 141,818
#2
Кусочек счастья 🤍
@happiness00_0 · 121,695
#3
amore,amore,amore
@ruh_parcassi · 85,879
#4
больно
@bolno365 · 21,634
#5
ЭТО ЗНАК
@etoznakmag · 636,947
#6
любовь к тебе
@homellsen · 8,991
#7
арабские цитаты
@iloveeyoustill · 77,454
#8
лейли нурани
@leylinurani · 46,300
#9
ⲗюⳝⲟⲃь.
@Lovestebe · 19,874
#10
𝓜𝔂 𝓹𝓸𝓸𝓵
@my_poool · 6,463
#11
love you
@tgloveee · 11,233
#12
vseotebe
@vseotebe99 · 37,881
#13
Echo
@byechoo · 9,964
#14
only we.
@only2we · 19,375
#15
️
@tesamiegolosovie · 10,871
#16
A.B
@absoullis · 27,666
#17
🎀mashikwq🧸
@mashikwqq · 16,398
#18
слюбовyou uma
@slbvuma · 14,647
#19
kkermond
@kkermond · 24,054
#20
𝑌𝑜𝑢𝑟 𝑀𝑜𝑜𝑛𝑙𝑖𝑔ℎ𝑡 𝑏𝑦 𝑍𝑜𝑟𝑖𝑎𝑛
@zorian_moonlight · 10,957
#21
𝒍
@sseovvs · 4,744
#22
09.08
@fatiko0908 · 27,689
#23
only love
@onlelovs · 25,322
#24
loveeeeeee.story
@loveeesttory · 18,690
#25
Адвокат по банкротству!
@psihstarr · 3,654
#26
Психология и саморазвитие ✨
@tvoya_psixology · 2,419
#27
serdce
@serdceii · 451
#28
moonkriss
@moonkriss · 17,628
#29
The end
@tthenddd · 21,989
#30
чувство верности
@wthlvan · 67,513
#31
𝑜𝑛𝑙𝑦 𝑠𝑡𝑎𝑟𝑠
@onlyystars · 5,386
#32
Euphoria
@Euphoriia7 · 9,112
#33
𝐚𝐥𝐥𝐰𝐚𝐫𝐚𝐪
@allwaraq · 13,686
#34
Это знак
@tyt_znaki · 100,310
#35
я хочу
@byloveromantic · 3,178
#36
asssav
@asssav · 20,688
#37
𝒊𝒕𝒂𝒍𝒚𝒂𝒏𝒆𝒕𝒔
@italyanetss · 11,869
#38
mooncheri
@moonnncheri · 13,392
#39
ᴍʏ sᴏᴜʟ
@RSS023 · 2,703
#40
with love
@withllove13 · 30,887
#41
The
@ismoilovTHE · 31,503
#42
s'lyubimoy
@slyubimoy · 24,045
#43
luv
@yaan_luuv · 39,240
#44
lumsml
@lumsmII · 21,628
#45
Маша и Роберт (Герберы)
@thegerberslive · 645,706
#46
утешение сердца
@utesheniecerdza · 5,107
#47
333 new love
@newlovechanell · 50,243
#48
365 new days
@evodays · 385,450
#49
only eysś
@onIyeyss · 40,602
#50
MS
@moyeserdce22 · 27,032
#51
Леонардо Дайвинчик
@leoday · 5,524,566
#52
эмоциональные всплески
@vsplessski · 49,210
#53
🎀Karna.val🎀
@karnava1l · 286,257
#54
там, где мы
@homemy1 · 15,836
#55
ВАЛЕНТИНА БЛОГ
@valentinablor · 124,060
#56
serein
@sereinyou · 3,209
#57
Аня Ищук
@anyaischukkkk · 601,146
#58
Премиум эмодзи | стикеры | Premium Emoji
@TgEmojis · 1,677,995
#59
ВПШ
@pravdadirty · 1,395,339
#60
ЕГОР КРИД
@egorkreed · 743,409
#61
ГОРОСКОП АСТРОЛОГИЯ ASTROJULIA
@astro_juliaa · 212,063
#62
OKB News / Новости от Ок блогера
@okbnews · 191,483
#63
Строчки из песен
@strochki_tg · 54,441
#64
Дима Масленников
@maslennikovliga · 2,134,958
#65
Стикеры | Эмодзи
@stikery4 · 1,083,175
#66
гороскоп и кирилл
@goro_kirill · 171,579
#67
Милашкина
@milashkina_nekrasova · 249,981
#68
E V O L U T I O N
@evo_memy · 1,040,244
#69
Я люблю
@ilowe_you · 112,349
#70

Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 18 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

amore,amore,amore
@ruh_parcassi · 85,879
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 18 August 2026
ab.soull
@absoulluve · 141,818
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 15 August 2026
полина, тебе знак
@znak_polina · 42,642
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 28 August 2026
арабские цитаты
@iloveeyoustill · 77,454
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 19 August 2026
Кусочек счастья 🤍
@happiness00_0 · 121,695
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 13 August 2026
ЭТО ЗНАК
@etoznakmag · 636,947
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 62 here — alongside 61 others — read 8 August 2026
лейли нурани
@leylinurani · 46,300
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 26 August 2026
Смс из будущего
@sms_future · 108,090
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 14 August 2026
вика, тебе знак
@znak_vika · 53,387
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 24 August 2026
соня, тебе знак
@znak_sonya · 53,832
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 23 August 2026
послание
@etoposlanie · 182,513
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 20 August 2026
настя, тебе знак
@znak_nastya · 74,247
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 61 here — alongside 60 others — read 19 August 2026
Это знак
@tyt_znaki · 100,310
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 60 here — alongside 59 others — read 15 August 2026
Галерея 🤍
@Galirey · 129,471
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 60 here — alongside 59 others — read 20 August 2026
я хочу
@xochu_kanal · 47,486
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 37 here — alongside 36 others — read 26 August 2026
Напоминание
@napomynanie · 71,073
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 20 August 2026
ХАМКА
@my_hamka · 79,995
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 52 here — alongside 51 others — read 18 August 2026
ЯЗЫКИ И ТЕМЫ ТГ ШРИФТЫ
@oboiparnyea · 239,911
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 59 here — alongside 58 others — read 18 August 2026
ЯЗЫКИ И ТЕМЫ ТГ ОБОИ
@temki_zvezdys · 2,354,516
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 58 here — alongside 57 others — read 7 August 2026
Бывший
@exboyfriend · 47,431
Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 26 August 2026
и дико мне
@asyassoul · 82,467
Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 19 August 2026
Идеи тату | Женские татуировки
@minitatu · 147,686
Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 61 here — alongside 60 others — read 12 August 2026
УЛИЧНЫЕ ДРАКИ БОИ НОКАУТЫ 👊
@mmanokauty · 212,093
Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 58 here — alongside 57 others — read 11 August 2026
Голос сердца
@my_golos_serdca · 99,287
Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 56 here — alongside 55 others — read 15 August 2026

This channel appears in 77 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 25 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“The end.” (@fory7o), 79,231 subscribers as measured 25 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/fory7o.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.