Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for telenews

Channel

telenews

@telenews

4 usernames

On this record: Topic · Observations · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry

11,999subscribers

+2,138 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001501679986
TypeChannel
Usernames@telenews @tgnews @tonnews @xxxxxxxxxxxx
DescriptionReal-time updates across crypto, social platforms & online markets. Contact / Ads: @Panther & @Plug @Supplier X @Hashtag Sponsored by @rainbetcom - rainbet.com
CreatedBetween 1 June 2021 and 31 March 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 November 2026
Measurements held222
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/telenews

Topic

Technology — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 15 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 87% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Views per post sit far above this size band

18,100 average views per post against 11,823 subscribers — an engagement rate of 153.3%. Across the 6,391 registered channels in the same cohort — 10,001–31,617 subscribers, posting mainly in English — the middle half sit between 2.54% and 14.4%, with a median of 6.81%.

What this was computed from
Window30 days (6 October 2026 – 5 November 2026)
Posts measured13 of 13 published in the window (0 exact, 13 rounded by Telegram)
Views totalled235,680
Mature posts only153.3% over 13 posts read at least 24h after publication
Subscribers11,823 measured 5 November 2026
Cohortb10000:eng · 6,391 channels · p10 0.671% · p25 2.54% · p50 6.81% · p75 14.4% · p90 25.3%
Position in cohort99.890th percentile · 22.5× the cohort median
Uncertainty±0.246% of the figure, from Telegram’s rounding
Post languageEnglish · 100.0% of the window’s posts

When this is recorded. A channel is listed here only when its engagement rate sits at or above the 99th percentile of its cohort and is at least 3× away from that cohort’s median — above it — on both the all-readings figure and the mature-only figure. The percentile alone would be circular: a percentile cut puts the same share of every cohort in the tail whatever the data looks like. The distance from the median is what makes it a statement about this channel.

This is not a verdict, and the direction is not a quality signal. A low rate has many innocent causes — audiences that read in the Telegram app without opening the channel, a subscriber base built long before the current output, an audience in a different timezone from our reading. A high rate has innocent causes too: a post that travelled far beyond the channel’s own subscribers will do it. We publish the measurement and the distribution it sits in. The full cohort baselines are downloadable, so this comparison can be reproduced rather than trusted.

Recorded under the key err_high, last confirmed 5 November 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Growth

9,86112,00010,930.511,9996 August 202613 November 2026
222 measurements spanning 99 days, net +2,138. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 9,540–12,321 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 222
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Nov 2026, 09:5511,999-1
13 Nov 2026, 09:0512,000+52
11 Nov 2026, 20:4911,948+7
11 Nov 2026, 16:4611,941+20
11 Nov 2026, 00:5011,921no change
10 Nov 2026, 23:5611,921+29
9 Nov 2026, 22:1711,892+3
9 Nov 2026, 20:5911,889+14
9 Nov 2026, 11:3911,875+2
9 Nov 2026, 08:1711,873+19
8 Nov 2026, 13:5611,854+3
8 Nov 2026, 11:1011,851+3
8 Nov 2026, 00:0511,848+2
7 Nov 2026, 20:5911,846+11
7 Nov 2026, 06:5011,835-4
7 Nov 2026, 03:5711,839+7
6 Nov 2026, 20:4811,832no change
6 Nov 2026, 19:5611,832+2
6 Nov 2026, 08:3411,830no change
5 Nov 2026, 23:5911,830first reading

Engagement

52 posts held, back to 14 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 63 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
85.7%
avg views ÷ 11,999 subscribers
Avg views / post
10,300
14 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.308%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
14
of 52 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 November 2026
Posts held52 (14 June 2026 – 12 November 2026)
Views total143,930
Reactions total443
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken13 Nov 2026, 21:34 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
321
Videos
39
Links
179

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 13 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
1m 42s
Average length
34s

Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

6,862 reactions across 52 posts, in 28 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 80.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🤣5,51380.3%
❤71010.3%
😭3344.87%
🔥841.22%
👍550.802%
🥰300.437%
🤯240.35%
😁180.262%
😨160.233%
👏130.189%
👀120.175%
😱110.16%
💘70.102%
🌭60.087%
🍌50.073%
😍40.058%
🤔40.058%
💔30.044%
🗿20.029%
😈20.029%
8 further kinds90.131%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 52 of the 52 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 6,862 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 52 most recent posts we hold, published 14 June 2026 to 12 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
488
across the posts below
Posts paid on
17
of 52 we hold a reading for · 33%
Most on one post
455
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @telenews. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 52 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 14 June 2026 to 12 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 6 of 14 posts held from the last 30 days (42.9%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

12 Nov 2026, 18:21 UTC≈2,920 views28 reactionsread 13 November 2026
Video

⚠ Don't Start Random Bots There have been multiple RCE's discovered on Telegram after its newest widget update. Threat actors are able to run malicious code on your devices if you start a bot. Telegram had recently patched a similar widget RCE exploit on Android, but more have appeared since then. UPDATE: Telegram has pushed out a new update to fix these exploits. Update your devices immediately to the newest vers…

🤣11😭9❤6👍1🥰1

11 Nov 2026, 22:10 UTC≈3,550 views26 reactionsread 13 November 2026
Photo

⚠ $12,000,000 Sold In Usernames Today, @Plug, one of our channel’s owners, middlemanned a $10 million deal for five Telegram usernames: @meow, @dark, @fear, @harm, and @lost, making it the biggest MM deal in com. In a separate deal, @Plug sold @Hurt and @Hate to @Satan for $1.5 million as well. So far, @Satan has spent well over $12 million on his usernames. 💧 rainbet.com the #1 Non-kyc Crypto Casino & Sportsbook…

❤19💘3🥰2😁2

10 Nov 2026, 03:25 UTC≈6,500 views35 reactions2 Starsread 13 November 2026
Photo

⚠ UPDATE: @Satan Sold for $750,000 Despite GRAM’s recent price drop, the auction for the Telegram username @Satan on has just sold for 700,000 GRAM (around $750,000) on Fragment.com. Do you think it was worth it? 💧 rainbet.com the #1 Non-kyc Crypto Casino & Sportsbook @rainbetcom @telenews

😭23👏6❤3🔥1🤷‍♂1🥰1

10 Nov 2026, 00:53 UTC≈5,550 views27 reactions2 Starsread 13 November 2026
Photo

⚠ @Satan Hits $500,000 The auction for the Telegram username @Satan is still live on Fragment, and the highest bid has already reached $500,000. Where do you think this auction will end? 💧 rainbet.com the #1 Non-kyc Crypto Casino & Sportsbook @rainbetcom @telenews

🤣14❤4👍4🥰4😭1

8 Nov 2026, 22:01 UTC≈7,730 views41 reactions1 Starread 13 November 2026
Photo

⚠ JUST IN: GRAM Falls To $1 Despite Durov’s push to boost GRAM/TON through MTONGA, the token has continued to slide, falling more than 50% and dropping to $1. Another 1 billion GRAM is set to unlock in February, adding even more supply to the market. How much lower can the price go, and will it ever find a bottom? 💧 rainbet.com the #1 Non-kyc Crypto Casino & Sportsbook @rainbetcom @telenews

😭22❤6🤣6👍3🥰2😁2

3 Nov 2026, 00:51 UTC≈13,000 views29 reactions7 Starsread 13 November 2026
Photo

⚠ JUST IN: @Satan On Auction @Satan was just listed on Fragment.com for auction. The last time a username like this was listed on auction was @devil where it reached a final amount of $1,200,000. Where do you think this auction will end at? 💧 rainbet.com the #1 Non-kyc Crypto Casino & Sportsbook @rainbetcom @telenews

❤19🤣4🥰3🔥2❤‍🔥1

30 Oct 2026, 02:35 UTC≈13,300 views28 reactionsread 13 November 2026
Photo

⚠ UPDATE: Binance Says Employee’s Computer Was Compromised Binance says the hack began after an employee’s laptop was compromised, allowing an attacker to submit unauthorized withdrawals. Total losses are at $6.3 billion, with about $3 billion frozen so far. 💧 rainbet.com the #1 Non-kyc Crypto Casino & Sportsbook @rainbetcom @telenews

🤣16❤7😭4🥰1

29 Oct 2026, 21:16 UTC≈9,470 views20 reactionsread 13 November 2026

⚠ Both Circle and Tether have began freezing funds. $2.4 billion has been frozen already. UPDATE: Both Binance and CZ have said that user funds are safe and the situation is being investigated. 💧 rainbet.com the #1 Non-kyc Crypto Casino & Sportsbook @rainbetcom @telenews

😭8❤5🔥4🤣2🥰1

29 Oct 2026, 21:05 UTC≈9,110 views21 reactionsread 13 November 2026
Photo

😂 Binance has been hacked for $5 billion and this is what Binance is posting on Twitter. Nice. Over $600,000,000 in crypto positions have been liquidated in the past 30 minutes. 💧 rainbet.com the #1 Non-kyc Crypto Casino & Sportsbook @rainbetcom @telenews

❤12🤣6😭2🥰1

27 Oct 2026, 18:56 UTC≈7,780 views39 reactionsread 13 November 2026
Photo

⚠ JUST IN: A hacker who stole $40 million last year is now day trading with the stolen funds on Hyperliquid. He is currently up $6 million off of a 20x ETH long and since August, 5/6 of his trades have been in profit. 💧 rainbet.com the #1 Non-kyc Crypto Casino & Sportsbook @rainbetcom @telenews

🤣21❤10😭6🥰2

26 Oct 2026, 19:26 UTC≈8,070 views50 reactions1 Starread 13 November 2026
Photo

⚠ Telegram macOs Client Open Sourced After getting flooded with bug reports, Telegram’s macOS developer has open-sourced the client and has told users to fix the bugs themselves. 🤣 💧 rainbet.com the #1 Non-kyc Crypto Casino & Sportsbook @rainbetcom @telenews

🤣36😭8❤5😍1

24 Oct 2026, 18:39 UTC≈7,950 views12 reactionsread 13 November 2026
Photo

⚠️ JUST IN: Hardware Wallet Breached Hardware wallet maker Keystone has been breached with customer names, contact details, shipping addresses, and order details, including products and prices all leaked. Be cautious of emails, texts, or calls from anyone claiming to be affiliated with Keystone. 💧 rainbet.com the #1 Non-kyc Crypto Casino & Sportsbook @rainbetcom @telenews

🤣6❤3🥰3

Showing the 12 most recent of 52 posts we hold for @telenews. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Posts edited after publishing

@telenews edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
13 November 2026
Most recent edit
13 November 2026

Mentions

Named by 32 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“telenews” (@telenews), 11,999 subscribers as measured 13 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/telenews.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.