Channel
@pledkryuchkom
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Advertising · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
941subscribers
-3 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001805258952 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @pledkryuchkom |
| Created | Between 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 7 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 7 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/pledkryuchkom |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 7 Aug 2026, 13:26 | 941 | -3 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 17:17 | 944 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 16:41 | 944 | first reading |
14 posts held, back to 2 December 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 14 (2 December 2025 – 6 August 2026) |
| Views total | 1 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 6 Aug 2026, 17:17 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
7 reactions across 6 posts, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 7 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 6 of the 14 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 7reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 2 December 2025 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.
This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor.A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.
Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.
| erid | Posts | First seen | Last seen |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2SDnjc4Lt4f | 1 | 7 December 2025 | 7 December 2025 |
| 2SDnjcAP6ik | 1 | 25 December 2025 | 25 December 2025 |
| 2SDnjdLkPCB | 1 | 6 December 2025 | 6 December 2025 |
| 2SDnjdihe3J | 1 | 30 December 2025 | 30 December 2025 |
A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.
Measured over the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 2 December 2025 to 6 August 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.
🌙 То, что хочется открыть, когда появляется свободная минута ↓ Обучение заработку онлайн идеи и материалы для изучения новых направлений ◼︎ Спорт Среда спорт, движение и полезные привычки ◼︎ Бесплатные приложения сервисы и инструменты для повседневных задач 🧁Курсы, Марафоны бесплатно!. 🧁Deep House. 🧁Идеи для рилс. 🧁Moskva vape shop. 🧁Курсы 18+ / слив. 🧁Вкусно худей. 🧁VIP Шаблоны. 🧁Плед крючком - Схемы. 🧁Топ WB Ozon…
🎄 С Новым 2026 годом! Желаю, чтобы он был похож на добрую сказку — с неожиданными чудесами, верными друзьями и счастливым концом. 🎉 Пусть ангел-хранитель оберегает Вас и ваших близких, а в душе всегда живет надежда на лучшее.
🔥1
✨ Пряжа Alpaca Air Gazzal Нежнейшая, воздушная и невероятно тёплая пряжа с идеальным балансом пушистой бэби альпаки и мериносовой шерсти. Из этой пряжи отлично получаются: 🧶 джемперы и кардиганы 🧣 шарфы и шапки 🧤 носки, перчатки и варежки Изделия выходят очень тёплыми, комфортными и мягкими, а красивая меланжевая палитра придаёт вязанию стильный и уютный вид даже в простых узорах. 👉 ССЫЛКА Реклама: ООО "Яндекс М…
🔥1
Описание
Свитер
🔥2
Капор вязаный теплый со снудом капюшон Капор женский демисезонный - это стильный и функциональный аксессуар, который незаменим в осенний и зимний период, способен заменить шарф, шапку и снуд одновременно. Реклама: ИП Веретенников Алексей Олегович ИНН: 183405040770
🔥1
24 декабря пройдёт бесплатный эфир «Как легко и быстро научиться вязать ирландское кружево». Если вы давно смотрите на ирландское кружево, но боитесь подойти, потому что «это сложно» и «надо много лет опыта» – этот эфир как раз для вас. На эфире разберут: – с чего начать, если вы вязали только обычные вещи и никогда не пробовали кружево; – какую пряжу и крючок брать, чтобы полотно держало форму и не «плыло»; – как …
🔥1
Сплошной ажур и бомбический цвет: пуловер, который хочется связать Модель, в которой удачно совпало всё: красивый мятно-бирюзовый оттенок, интересный узор и свободный крой. Зигзаги визуально вытягивают фигуру, а ажур делает вещь легкой и воздушной. Такой пуловер идеально вязать из мягкого хлопка или смесовки. В нем будет комфортно и в помещении, и на улице прохладным вечером. Отлично смотрится и с джинсами, и с юбк…
🔥1
https://dzen.ru/a/aTND4ohg_lCi86_c?share_to=telegram
Джемпер спицами "Ромбы": Вяжем базу на зиму ❄️ Девочки, нашла схему джемпера, который стройнит и вяжется за пару вечеров. Весь секрет — в крупном теневом узоре. Почему стоит связать: ✅ Крой: Спущенное плечо (никаких сложных втачных рукавов!). ✅ Узор: Теневые ромбы. Вяжутся просто (лицевые/изнаночные), а смотрятся дорого. ✅ Силуэт: Свободный, скрывает всё лишнее. 🧶 Пряжа (Важно!): Чтобы ромбы "стояли" и не были пло…
https://dzen.ru/a/aTLD4YKZTFebSq_d
"Опять деньги на свои нитки спустила? Лучше бы колбасы купила!" 😡 Знакомо? Почему когда муж покупает спиннинг за 10к — это «хобби и святое», а когда мы берем набор спиц — это «транжирство»? Я устала слушать, что мое вязание — это блажь. В новой статье разнесла в пух и прах миф о «семейном бюджете» и объяснила, почему тратить на себя — это не эгоизм, а способ не сойти с ума. Если вам тоже стыдно за каждый новый мото…
Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @pledkryuchkom. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 174,321 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 15 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@pledkryuchkom named 2 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Вязание своими руками” (@pledkryuchkom), 941 subscribers as measured 7 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/pledkryuchkom.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.