Did you guys try the bot out? You can try the different AI models and see what's good for you. I mean it's free. Click here

Channel
AI || Refacing video & photo || Technology
@refacee
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
5,590subscribers
-4 since we began measuring on 21 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001333216381 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @refacee |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 21 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 22 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 22 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/refacee |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 22 Aug 2026, 18:55 | 5,590 | -4 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 18:45 | 5,594 | first reading |
Engagement
12 posts held, back to 9 July 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 21.6%
- avg views ÷ 5,590 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 1,210
- 4 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 4
- of 12 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 31 July 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 12 (9 July 2025 – 31 July 2026) |
| Views total | 4,840 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 21 Aug 2026, 18:45 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 1m 52s
- Average length
- 56s
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Recent posts
Make sure to check it out
We have partnered with the AI bot BananaMama. The best thing about that is universal. It has all the AI models combined. You can pick whatever you want to pick. You can literally do everything that AI can do with this bot, like texting, creating photos and videos, even audios. The bot is just perfect. I personally loved this bot. I advise you guys to check that out BananaMama AI bot There are some of its work incl…
What's up with you guys? Sorry, I've been ghosting lately. I have some big news for you. Keep updated
if you want to post ad in this channel, feel free to contact @jak_editor
🤖 Lenovo introduced a desktop companion robot Inside is an advanced system with a screen and processors for local data processing. AI Workmate understands voice and text commands, responds to gestures, analyzes documents, creates summaries, structures notes, and helps make presentations… and it also has cute eyes. It also includes a built-in projector that can display content on any surface.
Not knowing AI is a problem Not building project with AI is a bigger problem ;)
File, posted without a caption
Photo, posted without a caption
gpt 5 is here. we're cooked
wassup people? 👋
https://www.youtube.com/embed/Qv2DtDn8dp0 It was all random. I just made video on YT
Showing the 12 most recent of 12 posts we hold for @refacee. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@photifyai · 63,263
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 45 here — alongside 44 others — read 21 August 2026
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 22 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“AI || Refacing video & photo || Technology” (@refacee), 5,590 subscribers as measured 22 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/refacee.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.