Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for DreamGF

Channel

DreamGF

@dreamgf_ai

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

1,085subscribers

-11 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001831814859
TypeChannel
Username@dreamgf_ai
CreatedBetween 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live30 August 2026
Measurements held8
Confirmed unchanged2 times, most recently 30 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/dreamgf_ai

Growth

1,0831,0991,0917 August 2026 — 1,096 subscribers8 August 2026 — 1,096 subscribers8 August 2026 — 1,099 subscribers12 August 2026 — 1,089 subscribers15 August 2026 — 1,088 subscribers21 August 2026 — 1,086 subscribers24 August 2026 — 1,083 subscribers27 August 2026 — 1,085 subscribers1,0857 August 202627 August 2026
8 measurements spanning 20 days, net -11. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,081–1,101 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
27 Aug 2026, 11:131,085+2
24 Aug 2026, 16:441,083-3
21 Aug 2026, 08:261,086-2
15 Aug 2026, 18:521,088-1
12 Aug 2026, 06:181,089-10
8 Aug 2026, 19:561,099+3
8 Aug 2026, 00:041,096no change
7 Aug 2026, 20:571,096first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 9 August 2024the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 19 October 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
19s
Average length
19s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

17 reactions across 9 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 52.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍952.9%
741.2%
👏15.88%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 17reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 9 August 2024 to 19 October 2024, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

19 Oct 2024, 00:01 UTC≈9,240 views0 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

In the east, Connecticut is charmed by Justin Timberlake and Natalie Portman🥰

18 Oct 2024, 14:44 UTC≈9,040 views6 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

🚨 DreamGF Leaderboard is Live! 🚨 We’re excited to launch our new Leaderboard and Creators Page! Each month, top users will receive rewards based on message count and character ratings. https://dreamgf.ai/creators Monthly Rewards: 1st: 250 tokens 2nd: 150 tokens 3rd: 100 tokens 4th: 75 tokens 5th-10th: 50 to 10 tokens Engage, climb the ranks, and win tokens! Good luck! 🎉

👍42

15 Oct 2024, 00:00 UTC≈7,420 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Hilary Duff, the girl-next-door star of Lizzie McGuire, embodied the perfect blend of sweetness and charm that made her feel, well, more real. More widely available access (thanks, paparazzi) meant a more intense emotional connection to celebrity crushes as a young millennial, as these stars grew up alongside them, eating the same kind of chips and playing the same video games, for goodness’ sake. Was that real life?

1

12 Oct 2024, 00:01 UTC≈6,370 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Millennials grew up in the golden age of the heartthrob – where teen magazines were adorned with celebrities you could really fall in love with (they were interviewed about their favorite movies and food, after all). Leonardo DiCaprio, with his boyish good looks and stellar performances in movies like Titanic and Romeo + Juliet, was the romantic ideal.

👍1

8 Oct 2024, 00:00 UTC≈4,980 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo

4 out of 10 people believe that people from Generation Z take celebrity crushes more seriously than any previous generation. Why? It’s likely due to the omnipresence of celebrities in our digital lives, including in older generations (who doom scroll just like the rest of us, make no mistake), so it appears to be “taken more seriously” when really it’s just “widely and publicly available information.” No matter who y

4 Oct 2024, 00:01 UTC≈3,990 views0 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Everybody who has played computer games has named their character after their current celebrity crush. But you would act differently when it comes to your own baby, right? However, 12% of our respondents say that they would consider naming their child after their celebrity crush!

24 Sept 2024, 00:00 UTC≈4,160 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Have you ever watched a movie with your boo and heard them saying “He is so sexy!”? For most people (82%) this is not an issue, but the other 18% get jealous when their partners have such thoughts toward someone else, even if it is a Hollywood star.🥰

21 Sept 2024, 00:02 UTC≈3,860 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Generation X had a more laid-back approach and yearning for their celebrity crushes. John Stamos, with his role as Uncle Jesse in Full House, was cool and collected – and his charm (alongside his Elvis impersonations) made him an instant favorite.😍

17 Sept 2024, 00:01 UTC≈3,660 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Salma Hayek, with her fiery beauty, unique inflection, and natural talent (cue Desperado), captured hearts in the same sexy way.🥰 These celebrities were seen as relatable and therefore lovable, like people who would still smile at you on the street and hold open a door, all while knowing you know who they are. A literal hall pass?🧐

👍2

14 Sept 2024, 00:01 UTC≈3,330 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

For this generation, blurring the lines between fantasy and reality is easy to do – which makes sense when you can follow Zac Efron’s (insane) physical transformation or see if Zendaya’s still into Tom Holland in real-time on platforms like Instagram and TikTok.🧐 This almost makes Gen Z more nonplussed than generations before, since they feel they got to know them passing by in the proverbial halls of entertainment t

👍1

10 Sept 2024, 00:00 UTC≈2,900 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Despite the allure of celebrity crushes, 70% of people do not believe in the concept of a “hall pass” in a relationship, indicating that while these crushes are fun, they are rarely taken seriously enough to impact real-life commitments.🤨

2

7 Sept 2024, 00:00 UTC≈2,890 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Zendaya, with her multi-talented prowess (literally – what can’t she do?) and wise, relatable personality, represents the kind of multi-faceted female that many want to be in a relationship with.🥰

1

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @dreamgf_ai. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Techno-Tricksters
@technotricksters · 48,401
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 16 here — alongside 15 others — read 26 August 2026
Photify AI Channel
@photifyai · 62,936
Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 45 here — alongside 44 others — read 21 August 2026

This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 27 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“DreamGF” (@dreamgf_ai), 1,085 subscribers as measured 27 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/dreamgf_ai.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.