Channel
@petrspile
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
52subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 9 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001209730019 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @petrspile |
| Description | i am a PhD researcher studying extra-academic knowledge production in Russian social theory and philosophy at King’s College London i like most things complex and anarchist | @torpyotr profile pic by @olechkalipatova |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 30 June 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 10 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/petrspile |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Aug 2026, 10:00 | 52 | no change |
| 9 Aug 2026, 14:15 | 52 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 17 September 2022 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 25 October 2023. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 10 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
33 reactions across 9 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 48.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 16 | 48.5% | |
| ❤ | 4 | 12.1% | |
| 🔥 | 4 | 12.1% | |
| 💔 | 3 | 9.09% | |
| 🎄 | 2 | 6.06% | |
| 😍 | 2 | 6.06% | |
| ☃ | 1 | 3.03% | |
| 💊 | 1 | 3.03% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 33reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 17 September 2022 to 25 October 2023, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Michael Garfield’s "Complexity", the official podcast of the Santa Fe Institute, is one of my favourite instruments for tackling household chores. I grasped some information for my PhD proposal from the episode on diseases of epistemology with Simon Dedeo, cleaned my bathroom while meditating over Ray Monk’s reflections on the biographies of Wittgenstein, Russel and Oppenheimer, was inspired by Gary Bengier’s writing…
👍4😍2❤1
Генпрокуратура объявила «нежелательной» организацией Central European University Университет в Австрии, по версии ведомства, запустил «ряд образовательных программ для студентов, в которых умышленно обесценивается и искажается история российского государства, преуменьшаются заслуги видных российских ученых, писателей, деятелей культуры, продвигаются псевдоутверждения о вине России во всех мировых катаклизмах». @do…
This channel will soon revitalise; in the meantime, it is impossible to ignore this new episode of repression towards the Russian-speaking academic community. Sending solidarity and support to colleagues affected by this decision.
💔3
Еще чуть-чуть философии Большой успех спекулятивного реализма – это примечательный кейс для социологии гуманитарных наук. Во-первых, большинство участников этого философского движения работали и работают в откровенно полупериферийных университетах, не имея за плечами ни большого финансирования, ни эксклюзивных связей. Во-вторых, общение между участниками ядра коллаборативного круга в основном происходит через посты …
👍1
currently here speaker: «Вузов в России много, а университет один — Свободный университет». 🤭 come and join! 🤭
Institutions in the U.K. promoting Russian culture “remain remarkably complacent and beholden to obsolete russophile fantasies, which reflect neither reality nor current ethical and geopolitical conjectures,” Michał Murawski, a professor at University College London, told The Moscow Times. The intensity of such arguments about how to study Russian culture — as well as with debates about “decolonizing” Russian studie…
👍3🔥2
Год в эмиграции: как складывается жизнь ученых, покинувших Россию после 24 февраля 2022? Одним из характерных трендов 2022 года оказался заметный рост числа российских преподавателей и исследователей, заинтересованных в отъезде из страны. Точное количество ученых, покинувших территорию России за минувший год, остается неизвестным. Однако интенсивное развитие многочисленных русскоязычных интернет-ресурсов, посвященны…
Channel name was changed to «petr’s academic pile»
Academic Stilyagi («Академические стиляги») The recent discussion* on the status of Russian-speaking sociological academia abroad, colonialism and integration strategies of Russian-speaking researchers provides a valuable contribution to Mikhail Sokolov's previous research on the tradition of ignoring others in the Russian academia. In my opininon, it illustrates the impotence of prominent post-Soviet researchers wh…
👍8🔥2
highly recommended ^
Привет, мы с Андреем Герасимовым в следующем месяце запускаем курс “Наблюдая наблюдателей: введения в исследования социальных и гуманитарных наук”. Курс о том, как развивалась и развивается обширная, но все еще разрозненная область исследований социального и гуманитарного знания в разных подходах и дисциплинах. Вы могли встречать это направление исследований под такими наименованиями как “social science of the social…
❤2💊1
-> While I believe that such an approach could have been accurate and fruitful at some point of time, I would say that today it has to be at least complemented by the analysis of the non-institutional centres of knowledge production. Hackers, activists, researchers from the authoritarian countries are commonly marginalised and underrepresented in mainstream science studies. They may not have a PhD, but they have a Gi…
🎄2
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @petrspile. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,153,757 of 1,176,251entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@petrspile named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“petr’s academic pile” (@petrspile), 52 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/petrspile.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.