Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for ЛЕГКО В ДЕКРЕТЕ

Channel

ЛЕГКО В ДЕКРЕТЕ

@legko_v_dekrete

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Advertising · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

31,058subscribers

-44 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001949838594
TypeChannel
Username@legko_v_dekrete
CreatedBetween 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live17 August 2026
Measurements held10
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 17 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/legko_v_dekrete

Growth

31,05831,12131,089.57 August 2026 — 31,102 subscribers8 August 2026 — 31,106 subscribers9 August 2026 — 31,116 subscribers10 August 2026 — 31,121 subscribers11 August 2026 — 31,101 subscribers12 August 2026 — 31,081 subscribers13 August 2026 — 31,076 subscribers14 August 2026 — 31,069 subscribers16 August 2026 — 31,066 subscribers17 August 2026 — 31,058 subscribers7 August 202617 August 2026
10 measurements spanning 10 days, net -44. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 31,049–31,130 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
17 Aug 2026, 14:3731,058-8
16 Aug 2026, 07:5331,066-3
14 Aug 2026, 21:0531,069-7
13 Aug 2026, 09:1331,076-5
12 Aug 2026, 05:5431,081-20
11 Aug 2026, 05:5231,101-20
10 Aug 2026, 05:4031,121+5
9 Aug 2026, 08:1131,116+10
8 Aug 2026, 09:3131,106+4
7 Aug 2026, 09:3131,102first reading

Engagement

17 posts held, back to 4 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 25 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
7.30%
avg views ÷ 31,058 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,270
17 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.44%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
17
of 17 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 17 August 2026
Posts held17 (4 August 202617 August 2026)
Views total38,525
Reactions total939
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken17 Aug 2026, 13:06 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
6m 53s
Average length
38s

Measured directly from 11 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

939 reactions across 17 posts, in 15 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 71.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
66871.1%
🔥12713.5%
😱454.79%
😁434.58%
👍262.77%
💔50.532%
😍50.532%
🤣50.532%
💯30.319%
🤪30.319%
🥰30.319%
❤‍🔥20.213%
🙏20.213%
10.106%
👌10.106%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 939reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 17 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
15
across the posts below
Posts paid on
15
of 17 we hold a reading for · 88%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @legko_v_dekrete. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 17 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 4 August 2026 to 17 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Advertising

Ad load
5.88%
1 of 17 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
1
posts carrying an erid · 1 distinct token
Median views · ads
1,870
over 1 measured post
Median views · rest
2,240
over 16 measured posts

An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.

This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor.A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.

Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.

Advertising tokens recorded on this entry
eridPostsFirst seenLast seen
2VSb5xDPWiN110 August 202610 August 2026

A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.

Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 17 August 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.

Recent posts

17 Aug 2026, 08:55 UTC805 views20 reactionsread 17 August 2026
Photo

Посадили на выходных красоту 😍 Метельчатые гортензии))

20

15 Aug 2026, 13:40 UTC≈1,950 views33 reactions1 Starread 17 August 2026
Photo

Любимые деловые булки 😎😎 Когда практически вся обувь в шкафу теперь это мягкие кроссовки, балетки, шлепки, чтобы можно было за ними угнаться. И железные нервные клетки)) ↗Хорошие шлемы тут

33

15 Aug 2026, 06:00 UTC≈2,100 views57 reactions1 Starread 17 August 2026
Photo

Федин зубной наборчик в 4.9 Паста Elmex 6-12 1450ррm фторида, для четырехлетки, трескающей все лето мороженое ок. Щетка электрическая Oclean - можно использовать для всех детей одну хорошую дорогую щетку, менять насадки и все. Пометить их каплей лака для ногтей. Мануальная Montcarottе стоит тоже своих денег. Покупала первый раз с большими глазами, глядя на цену. Но сколько разных щеток пробовали, всегда возвращаюс

52🤪3🔥2

14 Aug 2026, 12:29 UTC≈2,240 views84 reactionsread 17 August 2026
Photo

Что можно приготовить детям вместо покупного печенья на перекус все рецепты супер быстрые 1⃣Кокосово-творожное печенье Ингредиенты: Творог 180г. Яйцо 1шт. Мука 3ст.л. Кокосовая стружка в тесто 30г. Разрыхлитель 0,5ч.л. Сахар 1ст.л. или банан 1/2 +кокосовая стружка для посыпки Готовить так: 🔸Смешать все ингредиенты. Добавить сахар или половинку размятого банана. 🔸Мокрыми руками сделать небольшие круглые печеньки. 🔸

67🔥11👍6

13 Aug 2026, 21:07 UTC≈2,460 views57 reactions1 Starread 17 August 2026
Video

Опция разблокированная после 4 лет - можно вместе с ребенком ходить в зал на фитнес. Пошли сегодня на тренировку и Федя в группе рядом лежал занимался на коврике 😁 Занимались и подсматривали за ним. Если детских тренировок нет по расписанию, работает детская комната. Дима пока дома с бабушкой ❤️

32🔥20😍5

12 Aug 2026, 20:43 UTC≈2,610 views51 reactions1 Starread 17 August 2026
Photo

Как продать своим цветную капусту 1⃣Приготовить в панировочных сухарях - Феде с Димой больше всего понравился этот рецепт 🔸1 небольшая цветная капуста 🔸1ст.л. крахмала 🔸1ч.л. сладкой паприки 🔸1ч.л. сушеного чеснока соль 🔸3ст.л. растительньго масла 🔸50г. панировочных сухарей Готовили так: 1. Разогреть духовку до 220 градусов, противень застелить пергаментом. 2. Разделить капусту на соцветия примерно одинаковой веле

42🔥7❤‍🔥2

12 Aug 2026, 11:43 UTC≈2,510 views55 reactions1 Starread 16 August 2026
Photo

Омлет с сыром в кружке супер простой перекус за 5 минут Взбить 1 яйцо с ложкой молока в кружке, добавить немного тертого сыра и поставить в микроволновку на максимальную мощность на 3 минуты. Яйцо полностью пропекается, в кружке получается нежнее, чем в тарелке. Добавляем рецепт в быстрые перекусы))

36🔥13👍6

11 Aug 2026, 15:33 UTC≈2,240 views57 reactions1 Starread 15 August 2026
Photo

И погуляли, и дела все переделали)) Не хочется, чтобы лето заканчивалось 😢 Зимой такое уже не провернешь.

50💔5🔥2

11 Aug 2026, 05:56 UTC≈2,260 views67 reactions1 Starread 14 August 2026
Photo

Делитесь, что чаще всего добавляете в кашу?

62😱5

10 Aug 2026, 19:34 UTC≈2,220 views58 reactions1 Starread 13 August 2026
Photo

Как вывести пятна от томата - смотрите какая магия, сегодня весь день проводили эксперимент⏫ Промыть пятно холодной водой - в идеале держать под струей с изнаночной стороны, чтобы вымыть его, а не втереть глубже. И не заливать кипятком. А потом положить на солнышко, и оно само исчезнет, останутся если только кусочки мякоти, пятно от сока испарится. Ультрафиолет обесцвечивает томатные пятна, происходит это из-за ра

50🔥8

10 Aug 2026, 11:46 UTC≈1,870 views56 reactions1 Starread 12 August 2026
Advertisementerid 2VSb5xDPWiNPhoto

Хотела похвастаться, какая я молодец - начала регулярно заниматься, 9 тренировок за месяц + 2 раза сходила в зал, а сняла шедевр⏫ С одной стороны, заниматься во дворе на улице под стеной дикого винограда очень клева. Прям от самой обстановки хочется встать на коврик. Но Вольтик воспринимает это явно как вызов и бежит на коврик тоже 😁 Дети вроде уже поняли, что надо маме дать время, но раз на раз не приходится)) Но

24😁20🤣5💯31👌1👍1🔥1

9 Aug 2026, 20:15 UTC≈2,100 views133 reactions1 Starread 12 August 2026
Photo

Воскресенье под лозунгом - она хотела заняться своими делами, они развекались как могли. Пока разбирала стиралку - Дима взял порошок для посудомойки, большущую тяжелую упаковку и ходил посыпал им щедро так дорожки во дворе 🫠 Утром курьер привез, не успела убрать, поставила на крыльцо. Дима нашел, с крышкой разобрался и пошел посыпать. Порошок собрала и дала Диме шланг с распылителем мыть дорожки. Дорожки помыл и за

65😱40😁23🥰3🙏2

Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @legko_v_dekrete. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 290,880 of 1,480,975entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“ЛЕГКО В ДЕКРЕТЕ” (@legko_v_dekrete), 31,058 subscribers as measured 17 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/legko_v_dekrete.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.