Channel
@pashmamOrg
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
37,358subscribers
-459 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001497187997 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @pashmamOrg |
| Description | به رسانه رسمی و سرگرمی اوه پشمام خوش آمدید ✅ دو دقیقه خندیدن حق شماست ❤️ لفت نده، بیصدا کن :) 💯منطبق با قوانین رسمی کشور |
| Created | Between 1 October 2019 and 31 August 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 3 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 26 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 3 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/pashmamOrg |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 3 Sept 2026, 09:58 | 37,358 | -14 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 07:34 | 37,372 | -31 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 07:14 | 37,403 | -15 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 05:57 | 37,418 | -16 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 07:36 | 37,434 | -23 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 04:25 | 37,457 | -14 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 02:08 | 37,471 | -11 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 04:55 | 37,482 | -14 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 07:28 | 37,496 | -16 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 04:02 | 37,512 | -23 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 20:23 | 37,535 | -26 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 01:36 | 37,561 | -18 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 15:42 | 37,579 | -18 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 17:56 | 37,597 | -12 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 17:22 | 37,609 | -11 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 18:52 | 37,620 | -12 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 18:35 | 37,632 | -23 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 07:54 | 37,655 | -20 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 02:15 | 37,675 | -17 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 17:46 | 37,692 | first reading |
198 posts held, back to 3 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 59 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 183 of 190 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 198 (3 August 2026 – 3 September 2026) |
| Views total | 138,488 |
| Reactions total | 1,165 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 3 Sept 2026, 20:53 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 3 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
1,233 reactions across 190 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 73.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 😁 | 906 | 73.5% | |
| ❤ | 119 | 9.65% | |
| 👍 | 107 | 8.68% | |
| 👏 | 37 | 3.00% | |
| 🤔 | 30 | 2.43% | |
| 😢 | 11 | 0.892% | |
| 😱 | 10 | 0.811% | |
| 🥰 | 6 | 0.487% | |
| 🔥 | 5 | 0.406% | |
| 🤩 | 1 | 0.081% | |
| 🤯 | 1 | 0.081% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 191 of the 198 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,233 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 198 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 3 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
از عجایب زندگی در ایران! گرون میشه بیشتر میخرن محل ندی بیشتر میخوانــت بیشتر کار میکنی کمتر در میاری بیشتر درس میخونی کمتر نمره میگیری هر چی خوبی میکنی بیشتر بدی مـیبینی وقتی دنبالشی نیست، وقتی نمیخوای هست _ #اوه_پشمام 🆔 @pashmamOrg
خانمه میره آرايشگاه آرایشگره در حین کوتاه کردن ازش می پرسه حال مادر شوهرت چطوره ؟ خانمه جواب میده: الحمدلله خوب هستند: بعد دو دقیقه دوباره آرایشگره میپرسه حال مادر شوهرت چطوره ؟ خانمه میگه: سلام میرسونن. دوباره آرایشگره میخواد بپرسه خانمه میگه: تو چرا هی احوال مادر شوهر منو میپرسی ؟ آرایشگره میگه آخه وقتی اسمشو میارم موهات سیخ میشه راحت تر میتونم کوتاه کنم 😂😂😂😂 _ #اوه_پشمام 🆔 @pashmamOrg …
😁3❤1
نامه ای به دختر آیندم: "سعی نکن منو بپیچونی همه راهاشو خودم بلدم" _ #اوه_پشمام 🆔 @pashmamOrg
😁1
اگه میخوای اعصاب راحتی داشته باشی، این چند جا رل نزن: > توی محل کارت > توی فامیل > توی محله ی خونتون > ترم یک تا ۴ دانشگاه _ #اوه_پشمام 🆔 @pashmamOrg
😁3
ترسناک ترین قسمت مهاجرت اونجاییه که باید بریم اونجا هم جون بکنیم و تلاش کنیم تا زندگیمون رو بسازیم. تورو خدا ولمون کنین، ما باید چندسال استراحت کنیم که خستگی زندگی کردن تو ایران از تنمون در بیاد. _ #اوه_پشمام 🆔 @pashmamOrg
👍6
شما هنوز تو فکر اینین که انتگرال کجای زندگی به درد میخوره؟ من هنوز نفهمیدم بخش کردن کلمات توی اول دبستان به چه دردی میخورد _ #اوه_پشمام 🆔 @pashmamOrg
😁3👍1
رسما پروفایلم با لباس عروسه بعد اومده دایرکت میگه جسارتا تو رابطه اید؟ نمیدونم ازدواج رابطه محسوب میشه یا نه _ #اوه_پشمام 🆔 @pashmamOrg
😁7
من تا اونجایی كه يارم نامهربون يا آفت جون باشه ميتونم تحمل كنم، ولی اگه بخواد با ديگرون باشه و قدرم ندونه،ميزنم پارش میکنم صدا سگ بده _ #اوه_پشمام 🆔 @pashmamOrg
😁7
خدایا لطفا دیگه پسرا رو واسه درس گرفتن نفرست تو زندگی من، من درسهامو گرفتم الان وقت شوهره. _ #اوه_پشمام 🆔 @pashmamOrg
👏6❤1
طوری تو همه ی تبلیغات صداوسیما از چشم رنگیا و. مو بورا استفاده میکنن که هرکی ندونه فکر میکنه: ایران تو اروپاست نه خاور میانه _ #اوه_پشمام 🆔 @pashmamOrg
😁7
استاد عزیزی که تو این شرایط امتحان سخت میگیری؛ با هر سوال ۲۶ بار ذکر خیرتم _ #اوه_پشمام 🆔 @pashmamOrg
😁6
خروسها چرا انقدر زود بیدار میشن ؟ بگیر بخواب بدبخت انگار داری ده تا خانوار رو نون میدی، این اشرف مخلوقات بازی چیه در میاری اخه _ #اوه_پشمام 🆔 @pashmamOrg
😁2
Showing the 12 most recent of 198 posts we hold for @pashmamOrg. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 1 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 5 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 3 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“اوه پشمام...!!” (@pashmamOrg), 37,358 subscribers as measured 3 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/pashmamOrg.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.