Channel
@badTQ
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
39,540subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 4 September 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001433131328 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @badTQ |
| Created | Between 1 April 2019 and 31 October 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 4 September 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 4 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/badTQ |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 4 Sept 2026, 11:22 | 39,540 | no change |
| 4 Sept 2026, 10:47 | 39,540 | first reading |
18 posts held, back to 22 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 5 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 4 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 18 (22 July 2026 – 4 September 2026) |
| Views total | 918 |
| Reactions total | 5 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 6 Sept 2026, 00:54 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 6 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 6 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
400 reactions across 18 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 47.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🤣 | 188 | 47.0% | |
| 👍 | 51 | 12.8% | |
| ❤ | 29 | 7.25% | |
| 😭 | 28 | 7.00% | |
| 👏 | 20 | 5.00% | |
| 💔 | 19 | 4.75% | |
| 👌 | 16 | 4.00% | |
| 👎 | 15 | 3.75% | |
| 🔥 | 13 | 3.25% | |
| 🖕 | 13 | 3.25% | |
| 😁 | 4 | 1.00% | |
| 🤡 | 2 | 0.5% | |
| 🗿 | 1 | 0.25% | |
| 🥴 | 1 | 0.25% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 400 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 22 July 2026 to 4 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
سوال پر تکرار شما در دایرکت دیشب گفتیم کف کانال ۲۱۵ هست و هدف اول محدوده ۲۳۰ تا ۲۳۵ فعلا که تا نزدیک کف کانال اومده به احتمال ۶۰ ۷۰ درصد همین اتفاق میوفته و میره سمت هدف اول اون ۴۰ درصدی که میگیم شاید نشه میتونه در صورت مداخله ارزی بانک مرکزی باشه که بخواد برگردونه به کانال قبلی این صرفا تحلیل ما هست و پیش نهاد خرید یا فروش طلا یا تتر نیست. گفتیم که بازار های جامانده بهتر هست از طلا وتتر در شرایط فعلی.
👍2
تتر در واقع کانال عوض کرده و وارد یه کانال قیمتی جدید شده هدف اول این کانال محدوده ۲۳۰ تا ۲۳۴ هست کف کانالم ۲۱۵ طلا هم همینطور کانال عوض شد توی لایو با رسم شکل کانالارو میذاریم براتون اینجا بهترین و اصولی ترین کار اینه برید سمت جا مونده ها
👍3
سیگنال بنده به شما حتما طلا خرید کنید طلای فردایی ۱۵۶۰۰ و حتما تا ماه اینده ۲۲میلیون رو میبینه
🤣10👍1
ایران گفته مذاکرات جمعه و شنبه با عمانی ها سر مدیریت تنگه هرمز خوب بوده ولی فعلا تنگه هرمز بسته میمونه… نفت ۹۱ دلار …. کسشعر هیچ اتفاقی نمیفته
🤣12👎5
العربیه: ایران آمادگی خود را به پاکستان برای ادامه مذاکرات در ژنو یا دوحه یا اسلام آباد اعلام کرد. تتر ۱۸۶ تا شهریور شما دلار ۲۲۰ ببنید
👍25🤣20👎6❤2
رسمی؛ پوریا لطیفی فر بازیکن فصل گذشته گلگهر سیرجان با عقد قراردادی ۴ ساله به پرسپولیس پیوست. @badTQ
🤣7🔥5
🙃🙃🙃 @badTQ
👏19🤣11👎4😁1
والا @badTQ
👌16🤣9👍1👏1🖕1🗿1
رسمی؛ ووزینا به کولوکولو شیلی پیوست. @badTQ
🤣6❤3
دغدغه ی روزای آخر عمو اکبر برای مردم 😞💔 @badTQ
😭28💔17❤5
از کیت دوم بارسلونا برای فصل ۲۰۲۶/۲۰۲۷ رونمایی شد. @badTQ
❤8👍3🤡2🔥1
چرا صدا به تصویر نمیخوره 😐😂😂😂😂😂 بازیکن جدید تیم بانوان بارسا @badTQ
🤣21😁3🔥2❤1👍1🥴1
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @badTQ. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
@badTQ edited 2 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 4 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 4 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Ali ahmadi | درآمد دلاری” (@badTQ), 39,540 subscribers as measured 4 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/badTQ.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.