Channel
@BadTwittez
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
35,600subscribers
-367 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001493788087 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @BadTwittez |
| Created | Between 1 April 2019 and 30 September 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 3 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 25 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 3 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/BadTwittez |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 3 Sept 2026, 14:41 | 35,600 | -54 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 07:55 | 35,654 | -11 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 07:06 | 35,665 | -13 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 04:12 | 35,678 | -18 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 01:16 | 35,696 | -18 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 22:14 | 35,714 | -23 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 20:06 | 35,737 | -8 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 22:45 | 35,745 | -9 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 20:02 | 35,754 | -12 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 23:28 | 35,766 | -20 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 07:14 | 35,786 | -19 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 16:49 | 35,805 | -8 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 15:52 | 35,813 | -10 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 18:22 | 35,823 | -11 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 15:58 | 35,834 | -12 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 14:18 | 35,846 | -10 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 07:05 | 35,856 | -16 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 16:35 | 35,872 | -21 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 05:56 | 35,893 | -19 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 05:47 | 35,912 | first reading |
157 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 58 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 154 of 157 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 19 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 157 (5 August 2026 – 19 August 2026) |
| Views total | 494,670 |
| Reactions total | 10,641 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 3 Sept 2026, 21:19 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 3 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 8 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
10,641 reactions across 154 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 50.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🤣 | 5,352 | 50.3% | |
| 👍 | 4,562 | 42.9% | |
| 😐 | 727 | 6.83% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 154 of the 157 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 10,641 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 157 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 19 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
اگه با دختری رابطه داری که پدر و مادر سخت گیر داره، اما همچنان راهی پیدا میکنه که بیاد بیرون با تو قدم بزنه،کافه برید و... قدر اون دختر رو بدون؛ چون دار و ندار زندگیو آرامششو به خاطر تو به خطر میندازه... @BadTwittez
👍170😐12
فکر میکنی اصلا شبیه پدرمادرت نیستی تا اینکه مجبور میشی با داداش کوچیکت ریاضی کار کنی. @BadTwittez
🤣174👍23
کلا ۶ تا پسر فالور دارم اکسم میگفت اینا آبنمکاتن که ریموشون نمیکنی احتمالا اون ۲۵۰ تا دختری که اون فالو داره باقی مانده دریاچه ارومیه ان حیفه آنفالو بشن @BadTwittez
🤣154👍5
واستون ترند جدید آوردم، دودول سلطنتی، ترند جدید. در یونان باستان دودول کوچیک، نماد شجاعت و عقلانیت بوده! اگه به مجسمههای اون دوره دقت کنین، قهرمانان، خدایان و ورزشکاران، همگی با آلت تناسلی کوچیک به نمایش کشیده میشدن! در عوض آلت تناسلی بزرگ، نماد قشر پایین، حماقت و توحش بوده! این ادعا کاملا درسته و پسرایی که آلت تناسلی کوچیکی دارن، سلطنتی هستن و اجداد اونا قهرمان و از بزرگان بودن! @BadTwittez
🤣101😐12
📲 اپلیکشن رسمی سایت دربی بت 🌐 DerbyBet.com 💰 امکان شارژ ریالی ، ووچر ، کریپتو در کمترین زمان ممکن 🔥 🆔 @DerbyBet
👍2
✅دربیبت؛ جایی که پیشبینی فقط حدس نیست، شروعِ بردهای واقعیه! ✅با لایسنس بینالمللی معتبر، وارد زمینی شو که حرفهایها بازی میکنن! ✅آفرهای خفن ثبتنام در دربیبت؛ فرصتهایی که تکرار نمیشن: ⬅️ ۱۰۰٪ بونوس اولین واریز؛ شروع انفجاری ⬅️ پشتیبانی کامل از همه ارزهای دیجیتال ⬅️ درگاه ریالی و تومنی امن، سریع ⬅️ برداشتهای آنی و بدون معطلی ⬅️ پشتیبانی حرفهای ۲۴ ساعته _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ✅ دربیبت؛ ب…
👍1
تهش یه صفحه چت خالی میمونه که بالاش زده last seen a long time ago؛خودتو اذیت نکن بچه،زندگی کن. @BadTwittez
👍127🤣12
این که پاشی بری دیت که تازه ببینی از یه نفر خوشت میاد یا نه رو نمیپسندم. باید یجوری رو طرف کراش سگی داشته باشی که دیت اول تو باسنت عروسی باشه داری باهاش میری بیرون. @BadTwittez
👍129🤣20
دیشب تو یکی از محلههای تهران، یکی یادش رفته آیفون خونه رو درست سر جاش بذاره و صدای باز موندن خط، خواب رو از اهالی محل گرفته! مراقب صدای گوشی باشید بهتره @BadTwittez
🤣55😐13
🎲سایت جهانی و معتبر Melbet 🔴 بازی های مهم 27 مرداد 🆗ثبت نام آسان و سریع کلیک کنید🆗 ✅🤩🤩🤩🤩 بونوس اولین واریز ✅پخش زنده ی تمام مسابقات ✅درگاه اختصاصی برای کاربران 👍 پشتیبانی 24 ساعته فارسی 🎟Promo Code: MELBET90 🇩🇪دانلود اپلیکیشن MELBET📱 🔗لینک وبسایت👉 ⭕️جهت استفاده از vpn از IP های آسیایی یا کانادا استفاده کنید.🇨🇦 🇹🇷 🅰r28 ✔ https://t.me/+x60dZGAgXTUxM2U0
👍1
🇩🇪آپ اندروید سایت جهانی Melbet💥 🎁بونوس ورزشی هر چهارشنبه🔥 💸واریز و برداشت متنوع💵 ⭕️بدون نیاز به فیلتر شکن⭕️ 🎁کد هدیه ثبت نام Melbet90 ✌️ ✔https://t.me/+x60dZGAgXTUxM2U0
👍1
مطمعنمدوست پسر خوبی میشدم، ولی خب دخترم. @BadTwittez
👍78🤣32
Showing the 12 most recent of 157 posts we hold for @BadTwittez. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 2 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 3 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“بدتوییت | BadTwittez” (@BadTwittez), 35,600 subscribers as measured 3 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/BadTwittez.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.