Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Mark Changizi

@markchangizichannel

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1,383subscribers

-6 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001378619777
TypeChannel
Username@markchangizichannel
Created14 March 2021measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/markchangizichannel

Growth

1,3831,3891,3866 August 2026 — 1,389 subscribers6 August 2026 — 1,389 subscribers9 August 2026 — 1,387 subscribers12 August 2026 — 1,383 subscribers6 August 202612 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 6 days, net -6. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,382–1,390 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 12:391,383-4
9 Aug 2026, 02:521,387-2
6 Aug 2026, 11:481,389no change
6 Aug 2026, 10:301,389first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 15 September 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 31 January 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

6 reactions across 3 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 66.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍466.7%
116.7%
👏116.7%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 3 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 6reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 15 September 2025 to 31 January 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

31 Jan 2026, 04:22 UTC482 views3 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Even if we accept Hamas’ own claim of roughly 70,000 total deaths in Gaza over the course of the war, and given roughly 25,000 Hamas terrorists, and given roughly 5,000 Gazans killed by Hamas and Palestinian Islamic Jihad, and given roughly 10,000 natural deaths over that time, that leaves about 30,000 civilian deaths attributable to the war. That is 30,000 civilians to 25,000 combatants — roughly a 1.2 : 1 civi

👍3

5 Jan 2026, 20:49 UTC317 viewsread 6 August 2026

— Venezuela, Iran, and the Case for Decentralized Moral Action — We already understand why decentralization works in markets and in the public square. Distributed systems are smarter, more adaptive, and harder to corrupt than centralized ones. Millions of actors with skin in the game will always outperform a single committee with a flowchart. And we also understand the danger of centralized systems: they’re easy to

5 Jan 2026, 20:49 UTC442 viewsread 6 August 2026

These are not abstract test cases — they are real-world laboratories for what happens when tyrannical regimes understand the game. They know the international community will debate, issue statements, and pass symbolic resolutions — and they also know that almost nothing will happen. Centralized moral authority doesn’t restrain them; it reassures them. If we trust decentralization in economics and speech, we should t

6 Dec 2025, 17:36 UTC265 viewsread 6 August 2026

Tenure was meant to create fearless scholars. Instead it created loyalists. The moment something becomes a precious prize, people cling to it—and the more tightly they cling, the more easily they’re controlled. Academics build their entire lives around getting tenure, getting grants, and getting promotions—no one wants to be the assistant professor who never made it. They know their careers evaporate if the funding d

6 Dec 2025, 00:49 UTC218 viewsread 6 August 2026

Why Alien Starships, If They Exist, Will Almost Certainly Be Alive. Moment 559 https://youtu.be/TDuMRaNO2lM

4 Dec 2025, 18:15 UTC198 viewsread 6 August 2026

The Jew-haters infesting social media since 10/7 keep screeching that the Holocaust didn’t happen but also that they wish it had—apparently too dim to grasp that their own deranged enthusiasm for genocide is the strongest evidence that, yes, the Holocaust was not only possible but entirely in character for people like them. If this is how they behave in public, in 2025, imagine what their intellectual ancestors did w

3 Dec 2025, 00:56 UTC201 viewsread 6 August 2026

People often try to force Jews into modern Western racial categories, usually slotting them as “white.” The whole premise is ridiculous — not only because race is a crude and unhelpful lens for understanding an ancient diasporic people, but because even if Jews were a single race, it would be irrelevant to the moral calculus. The idea that a group’s rights, legitimacy, or vulnerability should depend on where they fal

2 Dec 2025, 14:56 UTC131 viewsread 6 August 2026

Lots of democides in the 20th century, and as an adult you should educate yourself about all of them. The Holocaust was, however, different: ~ Industrialized factories built just to kill ~ Transnational, dozens of countries ~ Goal of global extermination ~ Bureaucratic normalization ~ Pseudo-science driving it ~ Victims posed no military / political threat ~ Technology optimized for killing, not war ~ Systematic con

1 Dec 2025, 22:59 UTC128 views1 reactionsread 6 August 2026

— Remember when your bare face was a political membership signal? — Communities often find themselves in the strange position of using banal truths as membership signals. These signals aren’t ideological slogans or esoteric shibboleths—they’re simply statements that, under normal conditions, are too obvious to carry any signaling value at all. But when an opposing group anchors its identity to an absurdity, the onl

1

26 Nov 2025, 15:21 UTC154 viewsread 6 August 2026

In World War II, more than two million German civilians died outside the camps—women, children, and elderly people crushed in bombings, frozen during mass flight, starved during sieges, or killed during expulsions. Most were not Nazis — they were just civilians keeping their heads down. Yet almost no one today blames the Allies for those deaths. We intuitively grasp the causal chain: those civilians died because the

26 Nov 2025, 14:27 UTC134 viewsread 6 August 2026

The people shouting that we must “stop” or heavily restrict AI are naïve in three distinct ways. First is the *Luddite naïveté* — the belief that AI is some simple job-destroying machine rather than a general-purpose technology, and the fantasy that a panel of experts can somehow centrally manage it. This is the old technophobia dressed up in moral righteousness: fear of change, belief in wise overseers, and a blind

25 Nov 2025, 17:22 UTC115 viewsread 6 August 2026

It’s not just Islam that’s susceptible to collectivism and crimes against humanity. Moment 555 https://youtu.be/mb17A2odALY

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @markchangizichannel. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 731,194 of 1,480,688entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Mark Changizi” (@markchangizichannel), 1,383 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/markchangizichannel.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.