Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for ГЧП Пчёлка

Channel

ГЧП Пчёлка

@p3_bee_channel

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

470subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001088965996
TypeChannel
Username@p3_bee_channel
DescriptionНовости об инвестициях в инфраструктуру, не только ГЧП. Канал "Концессии в ЖКХ": t.me/zhkh_concessions Обратная связь: @p3_bee
Created15 October 2017measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (TGDataset)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/p3_bee_channel

Growth

4706 Aug 2026, 11:03 — 470 subscribers6 Aug 2026, 19:03 — 470 subscribers6 Aug 2026, 11:036 Aug 2026, 19:03
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 469–471 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
6 Aug 2026, 19:03470no change
6 Aug 2026, 11:03470first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 17 February 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
10.2%
avg views ÷ 470 subscribers
Avg views / post
48.0
2 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.04%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
2
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 1 of 2 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 31 July 2026
Posts held20 (17 February 202631 July 2026)
Views total96
Reactions total1
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken6 Aug 2026, 19:03 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
349
Videos
10
Links
3,790

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 6 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Reaction mix

19 reactions across 10 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 47.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
947.4%
👍526.3%
🔥315.8%
210.5%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 19reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 17 February 2026 to 31 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

31 Jul 2026, 08:28 UTC49 views1 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @primePPPPhoto

ТОП 3 новости сферы ГЧП Рынок ГЧП продолжает трансформироваться: регуляторные изменения ужесточают правила, а финансовые инструменты открывают новые горизонты. 📢Из подкаста Вы узнаете о 3 ключевых трендах в сфере проектов ГЧП: 🤚Ужесточение контроля за распределением субсидий (143-ФЗ). 🤚Новые правила возмещения НДС по ГЧП-проектам (218-ФЗ). 🤚Цифровые финансовые активы (ЦФА) и модель «60/40» для ГЧП-проектов и инф

1

9 Jul 2026, 06:02 UTC315 views2 reactionsread 6 August 2026

#ГЧП_финансы 🏦🧮 Банки готовятся существенно нарастить кредитование сегмента ГЧП. Дополнительный объем кредитных средств в новые проекты может составить 140–200 млрд руб., сообщили «Эксперту» в Центробанке. Это произойдет благодаря корректировке инструкции регулятора по расчету достаточности капитала банков: для проектов в регионах с высоким рейтингом риск-веса будут понижены. Риск-веса по ГЧП-проектам снизятся с 80

👍2

17 Jun 2026, 14:28 UTC163 views3 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @PPP_Kachkin_and_PartnersPhoto

В ГЧП-проектах одним из ключевых элементов защиты интересов финансирующих организаций становятся прямые платежи от публичной стороны при дефолте проекта. У банков есть довольно понятный и уже привычный арсенал: 🔹прямое соглашение 🔹конструкция договора в пользу третьего лица 🔹залог прав (требований) ❗️ Но в момент реализации такие механизмы упираются не в ГК, а в бюджетное законодательство – и именно там начинается с

🔥21

15 May 2026, 06:04 UTC308 views1 reactionsread 6 August 2026

#legalalert ❗14 мая Государственная дума утвердила во втором и третьем чтениях изменения в Бюджетный кодекс Российской Федерации. Нововведения обязывают получателей государственных субсидий раскрывать в контрактах с третьими лицами источник финансирования и наличие НДС, а также корректируют порядок расчета максимального участия государства в концессионных соглашениях. Действующее законодательство о концессиях и о гос

1

12 May 2026, 13:24 UTC140 views4 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @primePPPPhoto

Недостаточная проработка данных увеличивает время и стоимость подготовки проекта ГЧП 🤚Отсутствие исследования рынка и обоснованности параметров, заложенных в финмодель, может стать основанием для отказа от реализации проекта. Такие риски критичны особенно для крупных и долгосрочных проектов. 🤚Проекты, сопровождающиеся качественными рыночными исследованиями (включая оценку спроса), обладают более высокой конкурентос

2👍2

4 May 2026, 06:00 UTC143 viewsread 6 August 2026

#legalalert 🏥✍ Президент РФ Владимир Путин подписал закон, который запрещает передавать в концессию единственное в муниципальном образовании медучреждение, оказывающее услуги по нескольким профилям. ⛔ Законом запрещается передавать в концессию единственную в муниципальном образовании медорганизацию, которая оказывает помощь населению по профилям онкологии, анестезиологии и реаниматологии, эндокринологии, сердечно-со

3 May 2026, 07:02 UTC133 views1 reactionsread 6 August 2026

#в_мире 🛸 Компания Joby Aviation провела в Нью-Йорке недельную демонстрацию услуг своего электрического аэротакси, начав 27 апреля 2026 года с вылета из JFK и посадки пассажиров у нескольких хелипортов Манхэттена. Этот полёт стал ключевым этапом в рамках программы FAA по интеграции беспилотных летательных аппаратов и нового типа транспорта в воздушное пространство США, в которой Нью-Йорк был выбран одной из шести пи

👍1

28 Apr 2026, 11:03 UTC241 views3 reactionsread 6 August 2026

#ГЧП_финансы 🏦 📢 ЦБ РФ выпустил доклад для общественных консультаций, который меняет подход к оценке кредитных рисков по концессиям и ГЧП-проектам. ❗Главное: при наличии Прямого соглашения с публичной стороной банки смогут применять пониженные риск-веса, привязанные к кредитному рейтингу концедента. Ключевые выводы: 🔹 Риск-веса для качественных проектов (вместо текущих 80–130% / 50–250%): - 20% — РФ, регионы/муни

3

24 Apr 2026, 10:31 UTC125 viewsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @prime1Photo

⚡️ЦБ снизил ключевую ставку до 14,5% с 15,5% годовых Подписывайтесь на ПРАЙМ в Макс

21 Apr 2026, 19:07 UTC156 views2 reactionsread 6 August 2026

#legalalert 🏥⛔ Госдума на пленарном заседании 21 апреля приняла закон о правовом регулировании концессионных соглашений и соглашений о государственно-частном партнерстве (ГПЧ) в сфере здравоохранения. Соответствующий документ одобрили во втором и третьем чтениях. Теперь в отношении единственного государственного медучреждения на территории муниципалитета не могут заключаться концессия и ГЧП. Норма будет касаться орга

2

20 Apr 2026, 04:24 UTC96 views1 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @primePPPPhoto

ЧИТАТЬ СТАТЬЮ 🛑 1️⃣1️⃣1️⃣1️⃣1️⃣ Представляем Вашему вниманию аналитическую статью по важной теме: Эффективность концессий: новые правила оценки изменят рынок концессионных соглашений. 🟢Рынок ГЧП продолжает активно трансформироваться, и ключевым изменением на ближайшую перспективу можно назвать планируемое внедрение обязательной процедуры оценки эффективности и определения сравнительного преимущества в отношении кон

🔥1

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @p3_bee_channel. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,376,066 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“ГЧП Пчёлка” (@p3_bee_channel), 470 subscribers as measured 6 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/p3_bee_channel.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.